|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments on ‘Intel gives up on super-charged 'Gesher'’Tuesday 17th April 2007 11:52 GMT
How can they be trying to avoid Israeli references...
Robert Grant • Tuesday 17th April 2007 12:26 GMT
...when their developer forum is called the IDF? ...and they thought 'Gesher' was provocative
Joel • Tuesday 17th April 2007 12:53 GMT
The Intel Development Forum might want to look a little closer to home for potential controversy with regards to Middle Eastern politics, as they share their acronym, 'IDF' with the Israeli army - the Israel Defence Force! The reason is...
Anonymous Coward • Tuesday 17th April 2007 13:15 GMT
simply that the name comes from the israeli intel team. After the failure of the indian team to develop the new version of the pentium 4 microarchitecture, intel had to fall back to the team in israel, because they come up with a fast and low power pentium pro derivate, called core. (the ppro, pII, pIII, core, core2 systems share the same microarchitecture) The engineers just choose a name that they felt was right. Does it really matter?
Ian Ferguson • Tuesday 17th April 2007 13:58 GMT
Should I protest the name Bluetooth because he probably chopped off a few enemies' heads in battle? I don't think it really matters if the name is generic enough, pretty much any name has some kind of political ramifications. As long as it isn't too blatant, like the Intel Hitler Supremacy Chip or something, nobody will really care, beyond stoking the fire (not that I'm blaming El Reg or anything) The period for commenting on this story has finished |
Hot Product ReviewsSony Walkman S seriesMost Wanted Bits 'n' Chips
Data from Pricegrabber Review FinderAccessories
Price FinderTop Stories
Channels
On Other Register sites…
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||