I'm surprised they're bothering to willy-wave the startup time as it's not usually a big issue for laptops (sleep / hibernate anyone?). Even the performance kick shouldn't be that much of an attraction.

What's missing is the effect the reduced power consumption of the SSD has on the amount of time you get on battery power. Battery life is always a big deal in the laptop world so this should be the most effective selling tool and I'm extremely surprised there aren't some impressive figures being crowed about here.

Is there something they're trying to hide or have Dell's marketing types missed a trick?

Tim

Nice idea but I think its a bit too early. I bought my system with an 80gb hard drive and do a lot of work on offline files. I don't think 32gb will cut it.

Good advantages to Flash drives, low power consumption high speed, but relativly low capacity (not really a problem after you put your divx/mp3 on an external drive), but the main issue if I remember correctly is the write limits per sector.

A flash drive uses some fancy techniques to implement a wear-levelling system to avoid data being written to the same spot on the drive, as flash can take between 100k et 1000k writes on the same memory zone.

I remember seeing Windows (or resident programs) acessing the disk about once per secondn, generally on loging activities, even when the system was up but idle.

Specific Linux versions are built to run of flash keys (ok, not the same quality as a complete drive), and they are designed to log to ramdrive, leaving the disk alone unless really needed. PuppyOS springs to mind.

Has Windows been tweaked along these lines or is this going to be a buy now-RMA later jobbie?

Cheers,

Daniel

... not with dodgy ones they found in the local car park, I hope. (cf http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/25/usb_malware/)