What's the point of that? Are people's heads getting smaller? Is this distance from ear to mouth reducing through evolution, or is it targetted at kids?
By Christian Digby-FirthPosted Tuesday 15th May 2007 08:18 GMT
"Smallest" seems to refer to frontal area only. My Nokia measures some 10.5 x 4.3 x 1.1cm (thick) for a volume of 49.6 cu cm. That means even less pocket-strain than the Elegance at 57.3 cu cm. OK, my Nokia is nearly half as heavy again, but the "size" claim here looks somewhat dubious I'd say.
Nah, it ain't...the Xun Chi 138 is still far smaller #
By gezPosted Tuesday 15th May 2007 11:47 GMT
Old, old news, this...got MP3, camera etc., too...
Though i did see a bluetooth headset-sized one a while back...(sorry, dont know name, or have link) I don't know if it was real or not; or available in the UK.
Still, can anyone better this...? Brain implant, maybe...?
"Remotely controlled humans, here we come...!" (Courtesy of ROTM (TM), a division of BOFH, Inc.)
How many situations can you get with the following:
A very small camera phone
Some hungry, mockney Koreans.
A nocturnal, semi-deserted car park, much like that infamous one near Hampstead Heath, but for this challenge a much more appropriate location between Plaistow & Dagenham (or at least, on the District Line).
Comments on: World's smallest mobile phone spotted in UK
Head shrinkers #
By ian Posted Monday 14th May 2007 13:26 GMT
Title Is "smallest mobile" too big a claim? #
By Christian Digby-Firth Posted Tuesday 15th May 2007 08:18 GMT
Nah, it ain't...the Xun Chi 138 is still far smaller #
By gez Posted Tuesday 15th May 2007 11:47 GMT
Infinitely dodgy dogy comedy Reg headline conumdrum #
By gez Posted Tuesday 15th May 2007 12:09 GMT