Elder Scrolls: Oblivion benchmark results

Frame rates - longer bars are better

This leaves DirectX 10 gaming as a great unknown and we simply won't be able to answer that question for a few months to come - or just as soon as a rather more stable version of Call of Juarez appears.

We also can't investigate the new features of HD 2900 XT such as Custom Filter Anti-Aliasing (CFAA). Modes run from 4x CFAA - which is 2x anti-aliasing run through a Narrow Tent filter - to 24x CFAA, which is 8x anti-aliasing with Edge Detection, which sounds superb but until we see them in action it's not much more than techno-babble.

Related reviews

• AMD ATI Radeon HD 3870 graphics chip
• PowerColor ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT graphics card
• Intel power PC platforms: Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and V8
• Asus EN8800 Nvidia GeForce 8800 Ultra-based graphics card
• Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 hard drive
• MSI NX8600GTS graphics card
• Sapphire Radeon X1950 GT-based graphics card
• Sapphire Radeon X1550 graphics card
• Intel vs AMD - integrated graphics shoot-out
• Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS graphics card
• Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX graphics card
• PowerColor ATI Radeon X1950 Pro
• PowerColor ATI Radeon X1950 XTX

Looking back at our DirectX 9 testing figures, we can extrapolate that the HD 2900 XT will indeed match an 8800 GTS, so AMD is delivering fair value for money. On the down side, it's clear to us that AMD has been unable to extract the performance that it wanted from R600 despite the employment of enormous core and memory speeds.

Verdict

Nvidia grabbed the high end with 8800 GTX and Ultra, while AMD struggled to get the HD 2900 XT out of the factory door. Now it's here, and with boards priced at around £249, the Radeon HD 2900 XT take the fight to the GeForce 8800 GTS, and it's a very even battle. Hopefully, we'll have a clearer idea of their respective abilities when DirectX 10 games are published.

More comments…