|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments on ‘Intel to revamp Core 2 Duo processors on 22 July?’Tuesday 15th May 2007 09:24 GMT Here we go againAnonymous Coward • Tuesday 15th May 2007 14:47 GMT
Another round of increasingly confusing Intel product numbers - is anyone else getting sick of it or is it just me? NamesJoe Cooper • Wednesday 16th May 2007 00:35 GMT
I hate all the naming schemes they have. I understand the motivation to stop using clock speed in marketing because there are multiple major brands now and equivalant chips won't usually have equivalent clock speeds - and of course the fact that Core2's clock speeds are much lower than the Pentium IVs they succeed - but at least it was simple for telling the damn things apart. Oh, so the 700mhz is faster than the 600mhz? And two cores are better than one? Great! That makes sense! Now it's all E5923QSL and F05050 and MJ420. The whole AthlonXP 4000, 4200, 4500, etc. routine at least made some sense without throwing around the somewhat misleading clock number routine. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
Review of the WeekSony Ericsson Cyber-shot C902Most Wanted Bits 'n' Chips
Data from Pricegrabber Review FinderAccessories
Price FinderTop Stories
Channels
On Other Register sites…
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||