Comments on “Apple releases Mac OS X 10.4.10” • Register Hardware

Comments on: Apple releases Mac OS X 10.4.10

Back to the article
Comments on this article are now closed

Beware! #

By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 21st June 2007 10:14 GMT

Please be careful, as there are quite a few reports of problems with this particular update.

http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1005263&tstart=0

I certainly won't be applying it for a while, to see how the dust settles.

</cliff>

Its not Palendromic!! #

By Chad H. Posted Thursday 21st June 2007 10:18 GMT

Palindromic would be 10.4.01.... Which would be silly.

No it's not... #

By Matthew Macdonald-Wallace Posted Thursday 21st June 2007 10:24 GMT

A Palindrome reads the same from left to right:

AnnA

HannaH

10.4.01

so nerrr... :o)

You call that a Palindrome? #

By chuckufarley Posted Thursday 21st June 2007 10:38 GMT

Sorry guys,

10.4.10 is not a proper palindrome.

"Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas."

Now that is a proper palindrome.

Palindromic MacOS #

By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 21st June 2007 11:21 GMT

The Wikipedia site shows the release history of MacOS is full of palindromes, what's so exciting about this one, which isn't?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_history

NO! #

By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 22nd June 2007 09:39 GMT

A palindrome it isn't.

It's a bit like saying something is "almost unique". It's either unique or it's not.

No wonder Apple don't invite El Reg to their shows!

yes, it's a palindrome #

By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 23rd June 2007 06:48 GMT

Come on, you're all computer people, you should know this.

It's a palindrome at the token level, not the character level. Or another way to look at it, it's a palindrome if the numbers are taken in hexadecimal: A.4.A.

English palindromes have a very similar problem, which we just blithely ignore. The example given, "Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.", is not a palindrome because of different spacing, punctuation and capitalization. What, you say it is? Then you should accept the token-level version number palindrome.

The poster who cites Wikipedia showing the release history "full of palindromes" is only partly correct. There are a bunch of early versions like "3.3", but these are barely palindromes. "6.0.6" is the only previous 3-element example, and it was never actually released.

It's a lot easier... #

By FerretOfDoom Posted Monday 25th June 2007 17:52 GMT

...than Apple's previous cryptic updates.

For example...

System 7.5.2 got you 7.5.2. But, System 7.5 Update 2.0 got you System 7.5.3. And they weren't cumulative. It was much uglier back then.

This update has seriously shafted my Mac Mini #

By Ritch Ames Posted Wednesday 27th June 2007 09:50 GMT

Always do the Software Updates on my Mac's, never again.. a 5 month old Mac Mini is in a right state after this update - there is no other reason than the latest security update. I've read all the forums on the subject and have yet to find a fix. The thing won't start up, the fan is working hard enough to cool Metallica's drummer mid set, and when I force it to start up, the finder freezes.

Not impressed.