By Trevor WattPosted Friday 13th July 2007 16:28 GMT
You have everything you need to make a super in-car PC there! Touch screen, laptop components etc. all you have to do is lose the hideous thing holding the screen up and mount the screen somewhere remote to the case.
By Leo WaldockPosted Friday 13th July 2007 19:35 GMT
Tim
In the review I mentioned the screen mount but didn't spell out the fact that it's a pivoted joint so you can have the screen at almost any viewing or writing angle that you fancy.
I didn't much like the IQ770 but the angle of the screen is absolutely fine.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Saturday 14th July 2007 13:15 GMT
I was at a MicroCenter in the US and played with one of these. I'm 55. I thought it was great for several reasons.
1. It was the first PC that was a stunning to look at as a iMac.
2. The touch screen was great, and very responsive
I don't think that I would ever need to move it around the house, so I don't think that your downgrading of the weight is a valid point. Do you carry your TVs around the house? If it's a TV or media center, it stays where you put it, doesn't it? You don't say, today you are a desktop and take it to the office! And if the screen is glass that could be contributing to the weight. Though, I'm glad the the screen support is 'battleship' like, but as someone with several movable mounts for LCDs on desktops, again, once it's set up, you don't really move it around a lot.
It's a shame about the performance ratings, it would be nice if it was higher, and perhaps they could have made it quieter and lighter if the power supply was a brick.
By Leo WaldockPosted Saturday 14th July 2007 17:27 GMT
I reckon it's deliberate that the IQ770 weighs so much as it avoids any hint of screen shake if you're prodding at the touch screen. I can see that in some homes where you might have three or four IQ770s scattered here and there that the weight might be an irrelevance. If you don't intend to move it around then I am sure you could select a machine that is better suited to a specific purpose and which costs less.
My view is that the IQ770 is multipurpose and therefore can fulfil a number of functions in a number of locations.
Kids got their friends round? park it in their room so they can watch a movie
Cooking? put it in the kitchen to look up recipes
Email? On the coffee table
My problem is that the IQ770 is effectively a laptop with a 19 inch touch screen but it doesn't have the portable nature of a laptop.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Saturday 14th July 2007 18:39 GMT
...go back to rebadging iPods? It looks... *hideous*, and unless you wanted to go for the printer thing, it wastes a lot of space too. The total absence of elegance of any kind is nothing short of stunning, it's like a car accident. Even if this was the 80s this thing would be considered an ugly bloated abomination that you'd be ashamed to have in your house unless you felt a dire and urgent need to convince every visitor of your total utter straightness by displaying absolute absence of taste.
Nevertheless, the idea itself is swell. An undersized (screenwise), underpowered machine like this would make for a very nice digital pictureframe, plus it could be a touch-controlled-mediacenter-dumb-terminal of some sort, as long as you don't want to watch a movie on it. Too pricy for that though. So maybe HP can make it look more like an iMac - heck, an iMac G4 even - reduce the power even more, and sell it at half the price.
Comments on: HP TouchSmart IQ770 PC
The TouchSmart is a genius... #
By Doc Farmer Posted Friday 13th July 2007 14:08 GMT
Marvelous! #
By Trevor Watt Posted Friday 13th July 2007 16:28 GMT
Dual touch?? #
By Tim Posted Friday 13th July 2007 16:50 GMT
Screen angle #
By Leo Waldock Posted Friday 13th July 2007 19:35 GMT
I played a bit with this one #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 14th July 2007 13:15 GMT
Weighty matters #
By Leo Waldock Posted Saturday 14th July 2007 17:27 GMT
Can HP please #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 14th July 2007 18:39 GMT
Bet it won't play Hunt the Wumpus... #
By Matthew Macdonald-Wallace Posted Thursday 19th July 2007 10:02 GMT