Comments on ‘RIM BlackBerry 8820 smartphone’

Build Quality 

The 8820 is an interesting addition to the Blackberry line-up but we have been disappointed with the battery life and the overall build quality of the device.

The Pearl feels solid, while the 8820 feels a bit cheap to the touch. RIM may want to consider an aluminium product or something like the stainless steel Nokia 8800 (if they can keep the weight down) for the top end of the product line.

The review is correct about the "nuances" of the wifi settings and the applications' ability to exploit the high speed access - that's if you can get the device connected in the first place.

It is a good first try and is likely that it could improve with software updates.

No messages unless using GSM? 

Windows Mobile devices also fail to be able to use WiFi connections for their Direct Push syncronization. I suspect it's nothing that can be fixed with a software update unfortunately.

It's a bit average 

Having given out 4 or 5 of these things to users I wouldn't rate them at 90%; like nearly all RIM handhelds the PIM features are frankly average and all you're really paying for is the wireless functionality itself. Most of my users have no interest in anything other than the email and calendar functions. The calendar interface is particularly feeble and no better than what comes with my Palm TX. As handheld devices many Windows Mobile units are flashier and better designed, certainly a lot more glam. For what it's worth Blackberry handsets are very good at what they do and the wireless sync is without equal, but other than the physical formats getting glossier the basic functionality and refinement of the software hasn't changed in years. Mind, the 8820 is much better than the Pearl which is a horrible little troll of a handheld that sits unloved and unwanted on my desk.

No messages unless using GSM? 

Really, that's quite a revelation, as I can send and recieve email with the mobile network turned off, whilst just using the wifi connection.

@Nik: 

No, you misunderstand. Only the direct push and (I presume) the "instant" portion of RIMs solution fail to work without a cellular connection. You can still do manual syncronization with any other type of connection.

Q & A

 

Editors’ Blog

What do you think of Apple's Time Capsule?

I'm after for a network-connected HD, and this seems the best option - good router, integrated drive, only one power cable, suitable for PCs as well as Macs.

Terry Farrell

Click here to add your answer

 

Mac OS X Tiger out, Leopard back in

I couldn't resist. I went back to Leopard. I've been running Apple's latest operating system for well over a month now, originally 10.5.1 and now 10.5.2, with no untoward effects...

Continued...