|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments on ‘Time marches on to Nokia's latest handset’Tuesday 21st August 2007 13:45 GMT
should fall foul of advertising law
pctechxp • Tuesday 21st August 2007 18:34 GMT
If its twice as many colours as the human eye can see: 1) How did they design it? 2) there is no way of ever testing this so it should fall foul of trade descriptions 3) what happens if it selects a colour or hue that the eye cannot perceive, this would be perceived as a dead-pixel and prompt a warranty return surely? @pctechxp
Anonymous Coward • Wednesday 22nd August 2007 09:05 GMT
1 & 2) There are plenty of instruments available which are capable of measuring light with a higher resolution than the human eye. By way of analogy, just because you can't see radio waves doesn't mean they don't exist. 3) It doesn't produce light that the eye cannot perceive - it is simply capable of producing finer graduations in colour, brightness and/or saturation than the eye can perceive. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
Review of the WeekAsus Eee Box
Most Wanted PhonesReview FinderAccessories
Price FinderTop Stories
Channels
On Other Register sites…
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||