|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments on ‘Acer backs Blu-ray’Friday 31st August 2007 09:00 GMT Oooh, pretty!Greg • Saturday 1st September 2007 18:05 GMT
Wait...HOW MUCH??? </yorkshireman> In all seriousness, with regards to the first comment posted, I don't think the PS3 was ever really bad value, simply down to the Blu-Ray player. It's a stinking amount for a console, but when you can buy a really powerful console and Blu-Ray player for less than the price of, I dunno, a Blu-Ray player, who's going to go for the second option? It's exactly what they did with the PS2 and its DVD capabilities, and it's exactly where Microsoft continue to miss a trick with the 360. That said, it hasn't worked as well this time, because their new console costs twice as much as the old one. A PS3 being "good value for a Blu-Ray player" doesn't stop it being really expensive. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
Review of the WeekSony Ericsson Z770iMost Wanted PCs
Data from Pricegrabber Review FinderAccessories
Price FinderTop Stories
Channels
On Other Register sites…
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||