By Rob DavisPosted Friday 14th September 2007 12:25 GMT
I would expect a Mark II of this 'phone to include WiFi, based on one of the newer programmable radio chipsets that would support Bluetooth and wireless USB with on-the-go.
By Anton IvanovPosted Friday 14th September 2007 12:37 GMT
For the reference - 3.6 is the real performance you get out of HSDPA after correcting for brainwash by whalesong.
While the total bandwidth is 7.2 the bandwidth you can get is a power of 2 fraction of the maximum. If there is at least one voice channel in use on the node-B (or any other node-B which sharing a soft handover with the current one) it will be 3.6. If there is any information transmitted between the mobile and the Node-B it will require a channel for itself and will immediately split the code tree in half. Again - 3.6. If the Node-B needs to tell the mobile to adjust its power - it will once again require a channel and will split the code tree in half. This may happen up to multiple times a second. 3.6 one more time. Paging - down to 3.6 again. And so on.
Nice seeing Samsung finally being honest. Now, it will be interesting to see what does it actually take to make the other usual suspects including the operators to start giving real numbers and not whalesong induced brainwash. This is especially valid for numbers for "multiple mobiles using data on the same Node-B at the same time". These are quite entertaining actually.
By Glenn GilbertPosted Friday 14th September 2007 12:53 GMT
To me it doesn't have the 'wow' factor of the iPhone. OK, it'll be available on Vodaphone and will probably be a lot cheaper, but it still isn't an iPhone. It'll probably be bigger due to the slide out keyboard.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 14th September 2007 12:54 GMT
The touch screen is not nearly as responsive as the iPhone. The icon for the main menu is tiny. It's not clear where everything is. There are too many options everywhere.
However, dragging up or down to make the volume louder or softer works pretty well - shame they had to make it complicated again by having it FF/Rew if you drag right or left - something that's all too easy to do when all you're trying to do is change the volume.
The keyboard is fine, but it's a lot bulkier than the iPhone. 6 out of 10.
By Steve J. RapaportPosted Friday 14th September 2007 13:12 GMT
...is that it's not destined for the same market as the iPhone.
It's ugly, has a user interface that's strictly 2002, lacks wifi, and has a keyboard that seems to be too small and clunky for two-hand touchtype, yet too large for thumbs.
It may compete with the TREO or the Windows Mobile or Symbian smartphone market, but it doesn't have the cool of an iPhone. Not even 20% of that cool. It's warm and clammy by comparison.
By lesliePosted Friday 14th September 2007 13:39 GMT
what an omission............
No wonder the likes of the XDA still sell.
The people that buy ipods are the apple lovers, the people that buy the xda's are the 'older executives' and taxi drivers wanting tomtom - the people that buy something not mainstream like this phone, are people who can take a decision and wont buy it if its castrated from the beginning by poor connectivity!
By Kenny MillarPosted Friday 14th September 2007 13:49 GMT
Oh yeah, it does what it says on the tin. But when oh when will Samsung, Sony, Motorola et al catch on to the fact that it's a decent look and feel and simple controls we want?
We want to do things naturally. Where in the real life would I use a menu to look through a photo book, or flick through pages to listen to music? We don't! And that's why the Apple iPhone is always going to rule the roost - until the other manufacturers start to give the user what he wants, not try to fit the user into what they've made.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Monday 17th September 2007 01:25 GMT
You say it isn't cool compared with the ipod phone but the ipod (and related products) haven't been cool for a long time, when nearly everyone has something it quickly loses it's coolness...
Comments on: Samsung iPhone rival to hit UK in November
Why is something always missing? (WiFi) #
By Rob Davis Posted Friday 14th September 2007 12:25 GMT
3.6 is the correct number #
By Anton Ivanov Posted Friday 14th September 2007 12:37 GMT
OS? #
By Tom Peach Posted Friday 14th September 2007 12:48 GMT
Doesn't look as nice as the iPhone #
By Glenn Gilbert Posted Friday 14th September 2007 12:53 GMT
What's missing is simplicity. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th September 2007 12:54 GMT
The kindest comment I could make #
By Steve J. Rapaport Posted Friday 14th September 2007 13:12 GMT
More importantly...... #
By Adam Potts Posted Friday 14th September 2007 13:15 GMT
They imitate, but they don't improve #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th September 2007 13:27 GMT
no wifi - no sale #
By leslie Posted Friday 14th September 2007 13:39 GMT
When oh when #
By Kenny Millar Posted Friday 14th September 2007 13:49 GMT
No wi-fi??!! #
By Neil Posted Friday 14th September 2007 13:51 GMT
Danger... #
By Richard Posted Friday 14th September 2007 14:25 GMT
Has someone wiped their arse on the screen? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th September 2007 17:28 GMT
Re: The kindest comment I could make #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 17th September 2007 01:25 GMT