By Michael SheilsPosted Friday 5th October 2007 11:56 GMT
I hate these tiny phone designs, and I have to give O2 some credit for this phone as it certainly has caught my attention, if they bring it out in a dark colour I would have considered it.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 5th October 2007 15:22 GMT
If you're asking £295 for this as a PAYG shows O2 have either big balls or they've totally lost touch with reality if they think this phone is worth nearly £300. At that money they're saying it's got more to offer than nearly anything coming from Sony-Ericsson, Nokia, LG or Motorola. They're clearly a bit mad.
The phone lacks one thing and the review lacks another.. #
By Owen CarterPosted Friday 5th October 2007 15:45 GMT
Why don't manufacturers put a standard 3.5m jack in music phones? My SPV is the same as this, uses some crappy proprietary plug and they charge you a fortune for a new set of headphones. It was cheaper to buy a new MP3 player than it was to replace the orange (nothing special except the price) headphones.
- I know they also need to add a mic. and other control lines too.. but there are ways of dealing with that.
- And yes, it comes with a 'adapter', but I'll bet the adapter has crummy strain relief, breaks after reasonable use, and costs a fortune to replace (if you can even buy it separately).
As for the review, yet again we are not told about how the phone synchronises.. Just mac and windows info and no discussion aboutr wether it mounts as a USB drive (and is therefore compatible with pretty much everything.)
- Simon; this is, unfortunately, in the finest tradition of el-reg reviews.. Please, please give a overview of the sync method (USB filesystem, vs. proprietary/activesync/telepathy) and then note any handy apps they supply for specific OS's. Ta.
By Simon WardPosted Monday 8th October 2007 11:43 GMT
"If you're asking £295 for this as a PAYG shows O2 have either big balls or they've totally lost touch with reality"
If my recent dealings with them are any indication[*], it's definitely the latter and one of the main reasons I've booted them into touch and gone over to T-Mobile instead (I've also 'downgraded' from an XDA Mini to a Nokia 6300 - never been happier)
Having seen a Cocoon in the York O2 shop, the first thing I thought was 'Eeeewwww!' - looks like the bastard offspring of an iPod and a bedside alarm clock and, given the quality of O2s reception round here, is probably more useful as one of these than as an actual phone.
[*] - eg. ringing their customer support to request my PAC code and having to sit through an advert for the bloody iPhone.
Comments on: O2 Cocoon mobile phone
Slim is king, I don't think so #
By Michael Sheils Posted Friday 5th October 2007 11:56 GMT
O2 have balls #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 5th October 2007 15:22 GMT
The phone lacks one thing and the review lacks another.. #
By Owen Carter Posted Friday 5th October 2007 15:45 GMT
Bonus..? #
By Gareth Posted Friday 5th October 2007 15:58 GMT
not bad ... but the price is high #
By Richard Posted Friday 5th October 2007 16:43 GMT
Own worst enemy #
By Brian Posted Saturday 6th October 2007 14:20 GMT
Re: O2 have balls #
By Simon Ward Posted Monday 8th October 2007 11:43 GMT