Asus Maximus Formula Intel X38-based mobo
Maximus or minimus?
18th October 2007 11:48 GMT
Using first a quad core Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 processor and then a Core 2 Duo E6700 we found that the Asus out-performed the Gigabyte by a small margin despite the apparent handicap of slower DDR 2 memory. Overclocking the Gigabyte is a simple matter of jacking up the FSB and setting a memory multiplier, but Asus tries to make life even easier. Although the BIOS contains all the usual overclocking features, under the Extreme Tweaker menu it includes a feature called CPU Level Up, which can be set to Auto or Crazy.
PCMark05 Results

Longer bars are better
A. Gigabyte X38T-DQ6, QX6850 at 3.42GHz, OCZ PC3-1600 at 1520MHz, Single HD 2900XT
B. Gigabyte X38T-DQ6, QX6850 at 3.0GHz, OCZ PC3-1600 at 1333MHz, Single HD 2900XT
C. Asus Maximus Formula, QX6850 at 3.41GHz,OCZ Reaper at 1137MHz, Single HD 2900XT
D. Asus Maximus Formula, QX6850 at 3.50GHz,OCZ Reaper at 933MHz, Single HD 2900XT
E. Asus Maximus Formula, QX6850 at 3.0GHz,OCZ Reaper at 1200MHz, Single HD 2900XT

Longer bars are better
F. Gigabyte X38T-DQ6, E6700 at 3.20GHz, OCZ PC3-1600 at 1280MHz, Single HD 2900XT
G. Gigabyte X38T-DQ6, E6700 at 2.67GHz, OCZ PC3-1600 at 1066MHz, Single HD 2900XT
H. Asus Maximus Formula, E6700 at 3.20GHz, OCZ Reaper at 1066MHz, Single HD 2900XT
I. Asus Maximus Formula, E6700 at 2.67GHz, OCZ Reaper at 1200MHz, Dual HD 2900XT in CrossFire
J. Asus Maximus Formula, E6700 at 2.67GHz, OCZ Reaper at 1200MHz, Single HD 2900XT
In this context Crazy means ‘preset profile for your CPU’. However, it was a touch too ambitious for the QX6850, which it tried to run at 3.5GHz causing the system to restart during PCMark05. We manually clocked to 3.41GHz and once again got marginally higher performance with the Asus than we did with the Gigabyte.
3DMark06 Results

Longer bars are better
A. Gigabyte X38T-DQ6, QX6850 at 3.42GHz, OCZ PC3-1600 at 1520MHz, Single HD 2900XT
B. Gigabyte X38T-DQ6, QX6850 at 3.0GHz, OCZ PC3-1600 at 1333MHz, Single HD 2900XT
C. Asus Maximus Formula, QX6850 at 3.41GHz,OCZ Reaper at 1137MHz, Single HD 2900XT
D. Asus Maximus Formula, QX6850 at 3.50GHz,OCZ Reaper at 933MHz, Single HD 2900XT
E. Asus Maximus Formula, QX6850 at 3.0GHz,OCZ Reaper at 1200MHz, Single HD 2900XT

Longer bars are better
F. Gigabyte X38T-DQ6, E6700 at 3.20GHz, OCZ PC3-1600 at 1280MHz, Single HD 2900XT
G. Gigabyte X38T-DQ6, E6700 at 2.67GHz, OCZ PC3-1600 at 1066MHz, Single HD 2900XT
H. Asus Maximus Formula, E6700 at 3.20GHz, OCZ Reaper at 1066MHz, Single HD 2900XT
I. Asus Maximus Formula, E6700 at 2.67GHz, OCZ Reaper at 1200MHz, Dual HD 2900XT in CrossFire
J. Asus Maximus Formula, E6700 at 2.67GHz, OCZ Reaper at 1200MHz, Single HD 2900XT
3DMark06 responds enthusiastically to CrossFire and returned some enormous scores, but PCMark05 threw up an oddity as it shows performance with two HD 2900XT graphics cards is substantially lower than a single HD 2900XT, which is clearly nonsense. We’ve included one set of CrossFire figures to illustrate this point.
Verdict
Asus has used Intel's X38 chipset in a superb Core 2 Duo motherboard that delivers the goods, albeit at a relatively steep price. We suggest that you ignore CrossFire and instead dwell on the extensive list of features, the use of affordable DDR 2 memory, and support for Penryn and a 1600MHz FSB.
Asus Maximus Formula Special Edition
With its enormous potential for cooling and overclocking, this X38 motherboard is definitely more Maximus than Minimus...
- Suggested Price:
- £188/€269
- More info:
- The Maximus Formula Special Edition page on the Asus website


Intel Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor (2.66GHz, 4x256kB, 4.8GT/s QPI, LGA 1336 Socket B)
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad Core Processor (3.4GHz, 6MB L3 Cache, 4x512KB L2 Cache, 2000 MHz Bus, Socket AM3)
Intel Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor (2.66GHz, 8MB L3 Cache, 2.5 GT/s Bus, Socket H LGA1156)
Asus P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H LGA1156, P55 Express, ATX, 16GB DDR3)
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AMD 785G/SB710 Socket AM3 ATX Motherboard