I know there are lots of other "worlds smallest" things that are bigger, but am I the only on who found it cute/strange that the world's version of a piece of consumer electronics measures up to a size bigger than my arm? Or 0.0881657447 Double Decker Buses (5.8lg) to be precise.
Note adherence to Reg Club rule #5 whilst contravening rule #1.
By David HaworthPosted Monday 22nd October 2007 13:58 GMT
it's hardly the words smallest. I remember seeing a Hitachi 32PD5200 in curries years ago (2004ish I think) which was a 32" HD ready plasma TV. 1024x1024 res, DVI (with HDCP) and component connectivity.
not the greatest specs in the world I grant you, but it's the same screen size, it's a plasma and it's 3 years older. I'm not saying that the LG screen isn't alright, but it's hardly the worlds smallest.
I know there are lots of other "worlds smallest" things that are bigger, but am I the only on who found it cute/strange that the world's version of a piece of consumer electronics measures up to a size bigger than my arm? Or 0.0881657447 Double Decker Buses (5.8lg) to be precise.
Note adherence to Reg Club rule #5 whilst contravening rule #1.
By druckPosted Tuesday 23rd October 2007 08:35 GMT
A quick search reveals some sites are quoting a resolution of 852x480 which isn't even SD PAL. There aren't many 1080 LCDs in that size but almost all claiming to be HD are 768p.
Comments on: LG launches 'world's smallest' plasma TV
32 inch plasma is nothing new #
By Hiten Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 11:52 GMT
Not the First... #
By Paul Bennett Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 12:02 GMT
So my 5 year old 32" plasma... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 12:15 GMT
World's smallest. At 32"! #
By W Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 13:40 GMT
the worlds smallest plasma? #
By David Haworth Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 13:58 GMT
World's smallest. At 32"! #
By W Posted Monday 22nd October 2007 15:48 GMT
Not even SD? #
By druck Posted Tuesday 23rd October 2007 08:35 GMT