By Colin MillerPosted Wednesday 24th October 2007 16:30 GMT
Does the Obscene Publications Act cover digital media?
If so this can be used to restrict its ownership in England and Wales; it's the Civic Government (Scotland) Act (1982), for those who live north of the border.
By ShaunPosted Wednesday 24th October 2007 17:15 GMT
"he claimed the company may choose not to exploit the opportunity because the likes of Sony and Nintendo are likely only to allow onto their consoles games that carry a BBFC rating."
Well, that and the fact that there's no way of downloading games and playing them on the PS2 or Wii without using mod chips etc
By PeterPosted Wednesday 24th October 2007 18:18 GMT
Seems like a perfect opportunity to sell it on Valve's game delivery system, aka Steam.
I don't see why the BBFC is saying that selling games physically is more profitable. Valve went down the Steam online game delivery route because they were so pissed about losing all their money by using a publisher to sell it physically.
Get it on Steam, surely that's more profitable than not selling it at all.
By Morely DotesPosted Wednesday 24th October 2007 18:30 GMT
I doubt that I'll ever play the game, but if the Nanny State wants to keep me from having it, I damn well *WILL* go buy it now.
I didn't spend 23 years in the Army (11 of them in the Mech Infantry) to be told that I am not permitted to view gore and violence.
Bugger the censors (preferably with a hedgehog on a stick)!
and if it has scenes of Paris Hilton nude, I definitely won't play it. But I will DAMN sure own a copy!
Stick in some naked cartoons and it'd be banned in the US too #
By Andy BrightPosted Wednesday 24th October 2007 19:02 GMT
Funny really. In England it's fisticuffs and in the US it's nekkidness.
And yet in each country, the opposite bugbear is celebrated.
For the US readers, imagine the Superbowl with a full frontal streaker running onto the pitch during a live broadcast. Now consider the scandal if the TV cameras actually zoomed in and made sure you got every detail permanently burnt into your retinas, ignoring the game completely for a good 10-15 minutes. That's British tv for you - with a healthy sprinkling of sarcasm and anti-political correctness. But should even the title of the show include a violent word, say Ninja, then it would have to be renamed forthwith.
For the UK imagine a world where no matter what the violent content, nobody raised an eyebrow until a naked toon having sex entered the equation. Then the matter would be elevated to Parliament, a debate in the House of Lords and the Prime Minister promising something would be done to make sure our children were protected from cartoons having sex. The best way forward would probably be a campaign that advocates celibacy targeted at everyone under the age of 33.
What truly puzzles me is everyone is fully aware that hyping the violence or nudity of a product will escalate sales a million fold, so why would they be so stupid as to do it?
If you were a game publisher, sunk millions into a mediocre piece of shite, and desperately needed a winner to boost stock prices - what would this sort of reaction teach you? I would cheerfully expect all future releases from these guys to include unadulterated violence, and if they're wise enough to want to cash in on the US market - a liberal sprinking of toon sex whereever possible.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 25th October 2007 07:18 GMT
I remember when they tried to ban Grand Theft Auto thinking that people will start highkjacking cars, drive-by shootings, running people over and hiring prostitutes then killing them to get your money back.
GTA is still going strong and where are the bleeding hearts now? Picking on another computer game.
By A J StilesPosted Thursday 25th October 2007 08:37 GMT
Violence in video games make people violent in real life. We know this to be a fact because there was absolutely no record of any violence at all anywhere in the world before the first video game was invented.
By Bobby GPosted Thursday 25th October 2007 09:02 GMT
I just wanted to add my comment on this matter.
I feel that this country is too soft and left wing...
If a company make a game that is for 18+, then what is the problem? 99% of 18 year old + members of society wouldn't even think twice about it and certainly wouldn't go around mindlessly killing people because they saw it on a game or even a film.
If the BBFC are concerned about teenagers being infulenced by such games, then why aren't they actually prosecuting the parents of those teenagers for allowing their child to play such a game (and most likely would have bought it for them). the same should go for alcohol and other things. (but it doesn't)
And seriously - if a teenager is going around with a gun, why wouldn't the parents be responsible??? Oh no - surely the developers are to blame for their out-of-control kid and should be punished. How dare they push the boundaries....on a game!!! It's just a game dudes!!
Also - I wasn't intereted in this game until all this cafuffal (however it's spelt) but now I seriously want it - I bet it's fantastic "Fantasy" game play!
By Andy SPosted Thursday 25th October 2007 09:43 GMT
is that we actually have a legally enforced ratings system here in the UK. That means if its rated 18 shops can't legally sell it to anyone under that age. So why not just give it an 18 rating and be done with it? Every safeguard is already in place to prevents kids getting hold of it.
Although the game looks pretty crappy and i wouldn't bother with it. i still don't think the BBFC should be dictating what sort of games can and can't be played by adults. They should stick to dictating what games can and can't be played by children without their parents consent. (if a parent buys an 18 game for a child it should be assumed by the law that they have fully reviewed it and decided it is suitable for their child - one well publicised slap down of an outraged parent using this would stop them all calling for 'murder simulators' to be banned)
By Steve BarnesPosted Thursday 25th October 2007 11:21 GMT
I know the PS2 wouldn't be able to download it, but I thought the Wii had the capability to download games through Wii's online network thingemy? If not, could be a shift to an upscaled PS2 version for 360 / PS3 at a budget price through the PSN & Xbox-Live. Plus, the PSP version could be downloaded through the PSN on your PS3 too.
Comments on: Legal loophole allows Manhunt 2 to be sold in UK
man this so makes me feel.... #
By stalker Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 15:37 GMT
But.. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 15:38 GMT
It's not a loophole... #
By Graham Dresch Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 15:59 GMT
I wouldn't download that if I were you... #
By Cameron Colley Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 16:17 GMT
Obscene publications act? #
By Colin Miller Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 16:30 GMT
Download #
By Shaun Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 17:15 GMT
Let us hope... #
By Garth Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 17:16 GMT
Steam it! #
By Peter Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 18:18 GMT
Well, that's done it. #
By Morely Dotes Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 18:30 GMT
Stick in some naked cartoons and it'd be banned in the US too #
By Andy Bright Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 19:02 GMT
Not in the army... #
By Michael Posted Wednesday 24th October 2007 22:30 GMT
GTA #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 07:18 GMT
Violent video games make people violent #
By A J Stiles Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 08:37 GMT
Two bird, one stone... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 08:46 GMT
Blame the Parents, Not the Developers #
By Bobby G Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 09:02 GMT
the thing i don't understand #
By Andy S Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 09:43 GMT
@Cameron #
By Ian Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 11:20 GMT
Downloadable #
By Steve Barnes Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 11:21 GMT
We're in the army now... #
By Sy Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 11:22 GMT
GTA.. #
By Neil Spellings Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 12:14 GMT
RE: GTA.. #
By Daniel Bennett Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 13:16 GMT
Re: Well, that's done it. #
By Marco Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 14:07 GMT
re: @Neil #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 14:41 GMT