By Tony Smith, Editor, Reg HardwarePosted Tuesday 30th October 2007 14:03 GMT
Frankly, you'd be better off buying a Mac. You get a decent machine that will run Leopard better than a version of the OS shoe-horned onto a PC. And since Macs are Intel-based and come with dual-boot software - Boot Camp - you can install and run Windows on it to.
By Proton WranglerPosted Tuesday 30th October 2007 14:47 GMT
Steve Jobs is, in fact the Devil.
Macs use a completely different pre-boot system called EFI, rather than the traditional BIOS which loads a known boot block address from disk and starts executing it. So there'd be a big software effort to write an EFI environment for your chipset.
Then, I believe Apple Intel Macs also have a "Trusted Platform Module" which gives some kind of secure way to verify the the identity of the machine and who manufactured it.
I'e seen photos on the web of someone's machine supposedly booting MacOS in a virtualized EFI environment, but it was supposed to take over an hour to boot.
By Tom ParisPosted Wednesday 31st October 2007 09:48 GMT
Like a hell of a lot of folk out there I installed JAS 10.4.8 on my PC, the biggest problem for most folk is the graphic card but I easily found drivers for my Nvidia 7600 at insanelymac, I played around with OSX for about six months and liked it so much I went and bought a real Mac, as I read on the insanelymac forums – think of the hacked installs as trial versions, you might wanna take note of that Steve Jobs or even release a official trial version for all those Dells out there, like a lot of addicts we just need a free shot at it before we get hooked six months down the line..
At work I use a Windows machine for all my business applications but at home I use a Mac as it's so focused for a home user, iTunes, iPhoto, iDvd and IMovie are just so easy and convenient to use, my wife just loves iPhoto and the “events” ordering layout and skimming over Events is so intuitive..
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 31st October 2007 11:36 GMT
As a long time PC/Windows user who is pretty thoroughly annoyed with Vista I think a trial version - perhaps like Ubuntu's LiveCD - would be really useful. With the new version of Logic coming out, a good time to get those of us who use PCs for music interested in switching, especially as much of our USB outboard and PCI kit will work.
By Dave AronsonPosted Wednesday 31st October 2007 13:44 GMT
Kenny, not everybody wants top of the line HW. Putting OSX on a PC would allow people to put it on a *cheap* PC. If they decide later that they want a faster CPU, better graphics, whatever, then they can go buy a Mac... or a fancier PC. Whatever. It's their choice, which seems to be the point of the exercise.
By JasonPosted Wednesday 31st October 2007 16:16 GMT
OK, as we know Apple makes it's money from hardware. So charge the same as Vista Ultimate for OS X for PC, may not totally offset the hardware profit, but with the number of copies they sell it'd hit the high volume low cost strategy, and their profits would still increase. Hell they could even leave it the same price and just provide no support whatsoever; you run it on a pc, you get it as is.
By Ross FlemingPosted Wednesday 31st October 2007 16:39 GMT
To quote George Mallory "Because it's there!" :o)
Some people see a challenge and just have to do it. Obviously I'm not comparing a Leopard installation to climbing Everest, but techie aficionados like to rise to these sorts of challenges.
I put 10.4.8 on for a bit of a play - it worked perfectly. Granted, all it did was make me want to buy a Mac... If I could get it to work on a Windows version of VMWare or similar I'd be as happy as a pig in the proverbial
Answers to: Leopard on a PC?
Why would you? #
By Tony Smith, Editor, Reg Hardware Posted Tuesday 30th October 2007 14:03 GMT
Not without genius engineering skills #
By Proton Wrangler Posted Tuesday 30th October 2007 14:47 GMT
No, you can #
By Moo Posted Tuesday 30th October 2007 17:01 GMT
@Tony Smith #
By gabor Posted Tuesday 30th October 2007 23:55 GMT
Treat it as a trial version.. #
By Tom Paris Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 09:48 GMT
RE: Why would you? #
By andy rock Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 09:50 GMT
Any Rock you are wrong #
By Kenny Millar Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 11:06 GMT
Good idea for a trial version for PCs #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 11:36 GMT
yes, expensive #
By Dave Aronson Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 13:44 GMT
Hardware Offset #
By Jason Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 16:16 GMT
RE: Why would you? #
By Ross Fleming Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 16:39 GMT
Yes you can, but #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 31st October 2007 19:29 GMT