Skip to content
By Jeremy Hooks Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 12:58 GMT
>>However, the non-alkaline glass is much more expensive - around ¥6122 ($53/£26/€37) per square metre, according to market watcher DisplaySearch. £26 per 55in (i.e. 1 square meter) screen doesn't sound like a large percentage of the costs of an LCD screen.
>>However, the non-alkaline glass is much more expensive - around ¥6122 ($53/£26/€37) per square metre, according to market watcher DisplaySearch.
£26 per 55in (i.e. 1 square meter) screen doesn't sound like a large percentage of the costs of an LCD screen.
By b shubin Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 16:32 GMT
it IS glass, you know. coat/door/bye.
it IS glass, you know.
coat/door/bye.
By Craig Lawson Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 18:08 GMT
Could this mean that they'll be called Liquid Glass Displays and people who buy them advised that "this product has the ability to move over time."
By Anonymous John Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 19:44 GMT
Prices are dropping far more than that already.
Game changer?
Read More…
More…
from $2449.95
from $379.00
from $1499.95
from $1879.95
from $577.97
Comments on: Samsung glass breakthrough to slash LCD TV prices?
Much More expensive? #
By Jeremy Hooks Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 12:58 GMT
Surely smash or shatter prices? #
By b shubin Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 16:32 GMT
Display #
By Craig Lawson Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 18:08 GMT
You don't slash prices by reducing them by 6%. #
By Anonymous John Posted Thursday 1st November 2007 19:44 GMT