By philPosted Tuesday 20th November 2007 23:04 GMT
>the Atari name has mostly stood for doom and gloom since the video game crash of 1983.
now come on, the ST series was pretty popular in Europe and had a pretty big market share of home computers in the late eighties. Admittedly, their marketing devision were permanently on holiday during the release of the Lynx, Jag and Falcon - all decent machines that sank without trace.
By JamesPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 10:54 GMT
Infinium Labs should buy the name and rebrand the Phantom. That way Atari devotees can get a nice warm feeling every six months when Infinium put out a new press release promising incredible things, but their lack of ability to bring the console to market both safeguards the Atari name indefinitely and also prevents the inevitable disappointment when people living in 1989 discover it doesn't have GEM as a window manager. Win-win.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 11:23 GMT
The Infogrames balloon who changed the company direction on a daily basis.
Spend 3 years making a "simulation" and Bruno complains it's not "arcadey" enough, so spend another 3 years re-writing, at which point he re-appears and says "This would have been really good as a propper simulation". I shit you not!
How to double developement times and confuse your staff in one easy lesson.
It's sad, but no surprise Atari is going down the shitter, it stopped being a quality brand the day Infogrames got their hands on it.
By AndyPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 12:20 GMT
sound chip as a spectrum 128k.. says it all really, all they had over the amiga as mentioned was a midi interferace, and really how many people actually used that for playing games??!! just admit the amiga WAS the far superior machine.
still a shame to see such an important player in computer world is going...
By Simon BPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 13:00 GMT
My Dad had the Atari ST and then the Amiga. They seemed to be identical in spec but there was deffinately a noticable difference when I used them. The graphics were both on a par, the midi on the ST was used by people wanting to hook up there electronic keyboard and suchlike to it. But the biggest difference I found was the sound. The Amiga had far superior sound, and that came from the sound chip which was a top piece of kit from something else if I recall right, either way overall I rated the Amiga a better piece of kit as it delivered decent graphics AND sound.
By JamesPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 14:04 GMT
$ten-years-dead_platform is FAR superior to $other_ten-yeards-dead_platform, you $insult_that_only_someone_who_lived_in_his_parents_basement_since_1996_could_come_up_with!
By DanPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 15:22 GMT
I work at Atari for 8 years in the 80s-90s until they went under then. It was sad to see it happen then and even more sad now. I wish they could have pulled through somehow. I'd probably still be there today if they had really kept going.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 15:30 GMT
Both were amazing for the day, certainly far better than the equivalent macintosh. Very sad that Atari have bit the dust, but we can all hope that Apple only take a few more years to go the same way
By stuPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 16:26 GMT
even more amazing that a tongue-in-cheek comment can kick off the rivalry again after 20 years!
Anon: get a SOH...have a read of the register.. it's 'joke alerts' will have you spotting them in no time. In practice you might be able to detect them without an alert....
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 21st November 2007 23:34 GMT
The only personal computer that there has ever been is the Commodore C-64. I am writing this on one as we speak, and I run all modern software on it, such as Blitz-64, Centipede, and Race. I have seen these new Atari machines and the Amiga - and I just cannot see the world of 16 bit catching on. It simply provides no useful extra capability. As for those green screen XTs - what a joke.
Comments on: Atari may hit reset button again
doom timeline #
By phil Posted Tuesday 20th November 2007 23:04 GMT
I will remember them with fondness... #
By Andrew Moore Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 00:02 GMT
The ST series... #
By John Stag Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 04:04 GMT
STs..... #
By stu Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 08:46 GMT
I wonder what other games they still hold the rights for... #
By Alex Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 08:46 GMT
Marble Madness owned by Midway Games #
By Alexander Holland Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 10:12 GMT
Re: The ST series #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 10:12 GMT
A proposal to end all this pain #
By James Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 10:54 GMT
Blame Bruno Bonnel.... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 11:23 GMT
Atari's greatest ever move, Commodores greatest failure #
By Stuza Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 11:23 GMT
atari ST same... #
By Andy Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 12:20 GMT
Amiga vs ST #
By Simon B Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 13:00 GMT
Title #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 13:24 GMT
No YOU'RE wrong #
By James Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 14:04 GMT
Sad #
By Dan Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 15:22 GMT
ST and Amiga #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 15:30 GMT
atari vs amiga #
By stu Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 16:26 GMT
All crap #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 21st November 2007 23:34 GMT
C64 paris hilton simulator #
By stu Posted Thursday 22nd November 2007 14:03 GMT