By Jacob ReidPosted Monday 26th November 2007 16:52 GMT
One problem - intel graphics suck, you can get a better card for about £10. The only gaming you can do on intel graphics is solitaire, and even then, not on vista.
By Daniel B.Posted Monday 26th November 2007 19:51 GMT
Based on my experience with the i830M, no thanks, I'll keep my geForce 7600GT.
I think the whole *point* of 3dfx cards was to offload all that stuff from the main CPU and run it more efficiently on dedicated hardware. Hell, the Amiga did it decades ago and it was bleeding-edge tech back then!
By Tony Smith, Editor, Reg HardwarePosted Monday 26th November 2007 22:34 GMT
Daniel, the CPU doesn't replace the GPU - it contains a GPU, just as AMD processors already contain a memory controller. The CPU will become a system-on-a-chip.
By Gordon JahnPosted Tuesday 27th November 2007 11:55 GMT
Didn't the PC platform become the powerhouse it is by not sticking everything on one single-vendor controller board? This will undoubtedly be useful for lower-end laptop manufacturers and those trying to build small devices, but it goes against the things I like about the PC platform - choice and flexibility.
It reeks of Microsoft too... one day you have a business selling compression software, the next it's in the OS (and a bunch of other features like firewalls and CD writing). The same may go for graphics vendors...
Comments on: Intel to debut GPU-in-CPU chips in 2009
Nice to see... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 26th November 2007 13:05 GMT
'Gaming'? #
By Jacob Reid Posted Monday 26th November 2007 16:52 GMT
Intel GPU's ? #
By Daniel B. Posted Monday 26th November 2007 19:51 GMT
@:Daniel #
By Tony Smith, Editor, Reg Hardware Posted Monday 26th November 2007 22:34 GMT
GPU switching #
By b166er Posted Tuesday 27th November 2007 01:04 GMT
Strengths of the PC #
By Gordon Jahn Posted Tuesday 27th November 2007 11:55 GMT