By Paul SmithPosted Friday 14th December 2007 15:25 GMT
Pah! Fool had left it in 'baby safe' mode! Any competent sys-op would have up-rated the spring to full-on 'mean and nasty' mode. Along with replaceing the soft plastic tips on the darts with sharp metal points - purely in the name of improved aerodynamics you understand.
I bought the wired version, its a great little launcher, but it has a tendency to fire off loads of missiles when you ask it to only fire one. Some launchers fire off two, some more, and some just go round in a devastating four Patriot barrage (and the mech is still whirring away trying to fire more) - I pity the iraqis.
Have they solved it in this version El-Reg?
It works off a mechanical thing that doesn't always stop when it's fired one missile.
The other thing is it would be great if they'd release a dev-kit, at the mo we have to make do with poor under developed hack API kits - but wouldn't it be kewwwl if you could do it via a web browser?
By Ian Michael GumbyPosted Friday 14th December 2007 17:03 GMT
Just need to know some details about the launcher.
Or you could just make a more industrial model yourself, add a camera and make it available via the web.
And decent undergrad or grad student with access to a machine shop to build the platform and house the mechanical pieces should be able to cobble something up....
Skip the laser since that means line of sight. What you need is some sort of in office "gps" system.
By jamesPosted Friday 14th December 2007 18:13 GMT
Ive never done anything like this b4, but i have the old canon one, and one to know how i can make it go further! :) if u wna email me, lazy-sod@hotmail.co.uk
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 14th December 2007 19:17 GMT
Unlike the wired version, this weapon appears to present an alluring target for enemy hackers wishing to remotely redirect its destructive power against its masters.
Military boffins advise the use of one-time pads.
As for Ms. Hilton, we must redouble our efforts to protect her from these new threats. It appears that she has been outfitted with a protective metal coating, which is a step in the right direction.
By Rick BraschePosted Friday 14th December 2007 22:38 GMT
the newer one (wired) uses a spring to fire an air plunger. I get 15-20 feet consistently with mine. Problem is, the software hates Windows 2000-doesn't render right so to click the buttons to steer, you gotta click off them a bit.
Now I know there's linux and windows support for batteries of these, but you've gotta use up USB ports for each. I wonder if one wireless transmitter can control multiple launchers. If they're fixed to one channel, no one else in line of sight can have one of these. If they're different channels, you'd have to have multiple transmitters.
With a multi channel option, I wonder if one of those widgets that amplify or increase the range on IR based television remotes would work as a range extender? Could I hack the IR output of my PDA to drive this as well? Hmmm.
By Eddie JohnsonPosted Saturday 15th December 2007 00:21 GMT
But if NSA's monitoring all my communications through their secret ATT wiretap I expect I'll have a brigade of incompetent Feebs crawling up me arse a few days after placing my order. Anyone know a good Paypal proxy?
For those who prefer holding governments to ransom in their lunch hour... #
By Richard GriffithPosted Monday 17th December 2007 09:48 GMT
...when are they going to release the Wireless USB Orbital 1,000,000,000,000,000 watt death laser with sub-atomic space zoom and six port USB 2.0 hub? (Drivers only available for the Linux crowd.)
Comments on: Yes! It's the the wireless USB Missile Launcher
Too low tech for now #
By Vladimir Plouzhnikov Posted Friday 14th December 2007 14:07 GMT
Targeting #
By David Gosnell Posted Friday 14th December 2007 14:11 GMT
Linux support? #
By Mark Posted Friday 14th December 2007 14:25 GMT
One more thing #
By Fluffykins Posted Friday 14th December 2007 14:25 GMT
I spy a hack coming on... #
By Matthew Macdonald-Wallace Posted Friday 14th December 2007 14:29 GMT
Battery #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th December 2007 14:42 GMT
Weak #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th December 2007 14:49 GMT
Battery Response :) #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th December 2007 14:52 GMT
@Anonymous Coward re Weak #
By Paul Smith Posted Friday 14th December 2007 15:25 GMT
Ye Olde' version #
By Stu Posted Friday 14th December 2007 15:32 GMT
Not a too terrible thing to hack... #
By Ian Michael Gumby Posted Friday 14th December 2007 17:03 GMT
hack the interface! #
By P. Lee Posted Friday 14th December 2007 17:49 GMT
How do i hack the old one?! #
By james Posted Friday 14th December 2007 18:13 GMT
Armageddon (on a small scale) #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th December 2007 18:15 GMT
Size? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th December 2007 18:54 GMT
security?! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 14th December 2007 19:17 GMT
distance an issue, get the newer model #
By Rick Brasche Posted Friday 14th December 2007 22:38 GMT
I want one. I rilly RILLY want one #
By Eddie Johnson Posted Saturday 15th December 2007 00:21 GMT
I have one! #
By Dex Posted Saturday 15th December 2007 00:42 GMT
When you mentioned Batteries... #
By Graham Marsden Posted Saturday 15th December 2007 01:15 GMT
Needs a motion sensor... #
By Ben Mathews Posted Sunday 16th December 2007 18:06 GMT
For those who prefer holding governments to ransom in their lunch hour... #
By Richard Griffith Posted Monday 17th December 2007 09:48 GMT