By Simon WardPosted Thursday 3rd January 2008 15:02 GMT
It's 12.5mm deep, meaning that my dreams of having a half-terabyte drive in my laptop have been well and truly shafted :-( Ah well, looks like I'll have to settle for 320Gb, unless someone has a 9.5mm, 500Gb drive in the pipeline (can't see it, somehow)
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 3rd January 2008 17:08 GMT
HD manufacturers are unlikely to change their base 10 approach unless legally obliged - think about it, they'd all have to do it at the same time and even then it would look bad compared to "older" drives.
So this one's likely to be about 453Gb after formatting. The problem's just going to get worse as the numbers get bigger
By LaeMi QianPosted Thursday 3rd January 2008 19:29 GMT
Since they list 'Gigabytes' (GB), it is safe to assume it is base-10 Gigas.
'Gibibytes' (GiB) are the base-2 version, I recently learned.
Though as with clothes sizes, where getting one manufacturer to agree with another exactly how big a centimeter/inch is, reality might be more of a challenge!
By FraserPosted Thursday 3rd January 2008 22:38 GMT
Just think how many unencrypted personal financial details you could get on a drive like that if you work for some sort of government agency/accountancy firm.
By David PerryPosted Thursday 3rd January 2008 22:58 GMT
Slam it in a USB2 enclosure and you could probably plug into into an unmanned PC at HRMC - or ask a junior to do it for you, and blag that you could get him sacked for refusing to co-operate..
All these HD will eventually obsolete replace with the nano technology chips hold terabytes as small as a stamp with only .05 mm thickness. I couldn't remember the company name mentioned in a technology business magazine with millionaires sportsmen and billionaires heavily invested into the new starter-up specialist company. Apple iPhone and IPod should be the company to deploy such technology if not mistaken.
Comments on: Hitachi hypes 'world's most capacious' laptop hard drive
Pah! #
By Stu Reeves Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 11:47 GMT
Re: Pah! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 13:13 GMT
its like... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 13:24 GMT
Bugger bugger bugger bugger .... #
By Simon Ward Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 15:02 GMT
500GB or 500,000MB #
By Steve Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 16:11 GMT
Not even 500,000Mb #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 17:08 GMT
GigaMegaKiloWanna #
By LaeMi Qian Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 19:29 GMT
Wow #
By Fraser Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 22:38 GMT
@ Wow #
By David Perry Posted Thursday 3rd January 2008 22:58 GMT
nano tech HD #
By jeanl Posted Sunday 6th January 2008 00:55 GMT