By Giles JonesPosted Monday 7th January 2008 09:28 GMT
But the Amiga is long dead. People are just using the brand and following it had as a brand to attach to all sorts of rubbish technology.
Look back at the technology the Amiga had at its launch and to be called an Amiga now you'll need a computer that could render hollywood quality graphics in real time and have a truly amazing OS.
By Brett SaundersPosted Monday 7th January 2008 09:35 GMT
I got my careear started on an Amiga, and still boot the old Ami up everytime I go home for Christmas.
This "amiga anywhere" nonsense shouldn't even use the name Amiga - it has nothing in common with the Amiga computer.
I can't see how running AmigaOS inside a virtual machine on a cell phone would appeal to developers. After all, the first thing anyone did in running their games on a real Amiga was ditch the OS, gain control of the hardware, and recover AmigaOS's memory.
Sure - this may not be possible on a cell phone - but to call a glorified java replacement an "amiga" is a cheat.
By James Le CuirotPosted Monday 7th January 2008 11:02 GMT
I agree that the Amiga name should never have been used for this (AmigaAnywhere was bad, AmigaOS 5 is just heresy) but from what I've read about AmigaAnywhere, it's really amazing stuff. Apparently it can utilise CPUs of entirely different architectures in parallel. Unfortunately, there aren't many machines like that in existence. In fact, the Amiga PPC/m68k hybrids are the only example I can think of!
By Matt BryantPosted Monday 7th January 2008 13:57 GMT
Do you give the VM software away free to each OS vendor then charge the app makers a licence fee? It does have value if it can provide a stable and performant base across multiple OSs, just think of the developer savings is they only need to tune the app for one virtual OS yet can offer the product to many users on different platforms.
PS: To the Amiga fanbois whining about this being called Amiga - grow up! It's a trademarked name, the name has value so they will use it.
By Peter GordonPosted Monday 7th January 2008 14:17 GMT
What a load of crap. AmigaAnywhere never had anything to do with AmigaOS, and AA2 won't either. No part of AmigaOS boots up inside AmigaAnywhere. The two things are completely unrelated other than the fact that Amiga, Inc. have slapped the Amiga name on AmigaAnywhere.
To be honest this is a bit like having the headline "Talbot to restart production". The Amiga was BIG in the 1980s, yes, as was a great Machine in it's day. But a lack of investment coupled with a emergence of cheap(ish) PC clones and games consoles killed it stone dead. Now the "computer hobbyist" market is served very well by Intel boxes (running Windows or Linux) and the "Casual Gamer" market is served by the XBOX and PS consoles.
Interestingly the fact is that the proprietory Amiga was never going to work up against the open standard of the PC!
By Anonymous CowardPosted Monday 7th January 2008 16:58 GMT
Amiga having nothing to do with "personal computers"? Who are we kidding. That's where Amiga OS should be--it should not be focused on this. Amiga Inc. should be delivering Amiga OS on x86-64 architecture, with a 64-Bit-centric worldview (i.e., Desktops and Servers at its core!)
Many want Amiga OS to be revamped, updated, brought up to standards (like with SATA I & II, USB. 2/3, PCI-E support, etc.); and for it to be able to utilize regular PC motherboards.
The path for Amiga OS is just that--with all these tiny devices like PDAs, phones, and so forth, satelliting around the main PERSONAL COMPUTER.
I have to condemn Amiga until they announce they are putting the OS on x86-64 (and by that I mean a desktop/server OS utilizing CPUs from the likes of Intel and AMD). I want to see Amiga OS exactly where Microsoft Windows exists, utilizing exactly what Microsoft Windows and Apple utilizes, and providing an alternative to those very OSes--because this, I recognize, is what many, many, many people desire out of Amiga Inc. Not some follow-the-leader exercise.
I do not support their AmigaAnywhere 2 vision whatsoever. I condemn their lack of resolve in providing what the end-user (Amigans) really wants. I really wish they would get rid of Bill McEwen and do the right thing with the OS, and not ruin the good reputation and brand it had in the past.
They could easily partner with Commodore and pick up the "Commodore-Amiga" line of computers, providing a "Commodore-Amiga 5000", for example, which could be designed to take either PPC or x86-64 motherboards, and be made to support all the latest industry standards. Doesn't have to be Commodore as parent company, either, to do that.
They should write/release "Amiga Phoenix" (i.e., OS5) that can auto-sense the hardware, and install appropriate libraries (for PPC or x86-64), and that has full backward compatibility with all previous Amiga OSes and Amiga software (quite possible by rewriting Amiga's Exec kernel in the exokernel structure, separating resource management from resource protection). They could then have this 32-Bit AmigaAnywhere (or AmigaDE as it was once called) merged with the 32-Bit Amiga OS classic as a deployable module that both resides on the larger, better, more advanced 64-Bit OS...as well as hosted on Windows, Linux, MAC, and so on.
By StephenPosted Monday 7th January 2008 16:58 GMT
Amiga having nothing to do with "personal computers"? Who are we kidding. That's where Amiga OS should be--it should not be focused on this. Amiga Inc. should be delivering Amiga OS on x86-64 architecture, with a 64-Bit-centric worldview (i.e., Desktops and Servers at its core!)
Many want Amiga OS to be revamped, updated, brought up to standards (like with SATA I & II, USB. 2/3, PCI-E support, etc.); and for it to be able to utilize regular PC motherboards.
The path for Amiga OS is just that--with all these tiny devices like PDAs, phones, and so forth, satelliting around the main PERSONAL COMPUTER.
I have to condemn Amiga until they announce they are putting the OS on x86-64 (and by that I mean a desktop/server OS utilizing CPUs from the likes of Intel and AMD). I want to see Amiga OS exactly where Microsoft Windows exists, utilizing exactly what Microsoft Windows and Apple utilizes, and providing an alternative to those very OSes--because this, I recognize, is what many, many, many people desire out of Amiga Inc. Not some follow-the-leader exercise.
I do not support their AmigaAnywhere 2 vision whatsoever. I condemn their lack of resolve in providing what the end-user (Amigans) really wants. I really wish they would get rid of Bill McEwen and do the right thing with the OS, and not ruin the good reputation and brand it had in the past.
They could easily partner with Commodore and pick up the "Commodore-Amiga" line of computers, providing a "Commodore-Amiga 5000", for example, which could be designed to take either PPC or x86-64 motherboards, and be made to support all the latest industry standards. Doesn't have to be Commodore as parent company, either, to do that.
They should write/release "Amiga Phoenix" (i.e., OS5) that can auto-sense the hardware, and install appropriate libraries (for PPC or x86-64), and that has full backward compatibility with all previous Amiga OSes and Amiga software (quite possible by rewriting Amiga's Exec kernel in the exokernel structure, separating resource management from resource protection). They could then have this 32-Bit AmigaAnywhere (or AmigaDE as it was once called) merged with the 32-Bit Amiga OS classic as a deployable module that both resides on the larger, better, more advanced 64-Bit OS...as well as hosted on Windows, Linux, MAC, and so on.
By RaffaelePosted Monday 7th January 2008 17:21 GMT
Who cares of Amiga Anywhere?
I mean it is good technology and I knew it does tricks that are not common with Java...
As AmigaAnywhere runs the same programs by changing screen resolution on the fly on different devices, and if you run any program from SD memory cards and then you extract it hotplug (plug-in plug-out) from a device, then it suspends the running program and continue running it on another device, just after the hotplugging...
But it is not Open Source, while Java it is...
And AmigaAnywhere is not aimed at desktop usage...
While us Amigans want to spread how beauty and usable it is AmigaOS...
It is no resource consuming... It runs with a minimum of 128 MB (MEGA) of RAM, and common installation may vary from 17 Megabytes (MorphOS) or 40 Megabyte (AmigaOS 4.0)...
It is very low footprint... It is real multitasking and aimed at multimedia...
The OS needs a very limited number of files to run, it has an easy system to deal with Hardware Devices, and its system of directories, commands, preferences and common rules sure needs very few time and effort to be learnt and then mastered by any user...
To install a program usually you have just to copy only 2 or 3 files in a directory with the same name of the software you purchased, and a library with the same name of the software, in the obliged path "Libs:"...
To upgrade the system usually needs only one single file to be placed in obliged places...
EAAAASY!
There are lots of programs
(See here for example a range of its software running on MorphOS:
There are centralized systems for dealing with files (Ddatatype and Mimetype system), recognizing and extracting achives and compressed (XAD Library), and with FTP (Amiga trade Center), and so on...
By RaffaelePosted Monday 7th January 2008 17:41 GMT
Eyeam wrote:
[quote]
Many want Amiga OS to be revamped, updated, brought up to standards (like with SATA I & II, USB. 2/3, PCI-E support, etc.); and for it to be able to utilize regular PC motherboards.
[/quote]
But Amiga has already USB 2.0 support... Use Poseidon stack with a compatible USB 2.0 PCI card...
Regarding SATA and PCI-Express, the italian made SAM440EP moherboard, born o became the new Amiga it is ready for that technology and just awaits for a license of AmigaOS 4.0
[quote]
I have to condemn Amiga until they announce they are putting the OS on x86-64 (and by that I mean a desktop/server OS utilizing CPUs from the likes of Intel and AMD). I want to see Amiga OS exactly where Microsoft Windows exists
[/quote]
Then all you must to do it is to get an old PC Intel machine and download and install the 64bit full version of AROS on it!
By Liam ProvenPosted Monday 7th January 2008 18:00 GMT
AmigaAnywhere was just a licensed version of Tao's stunning Taos OS, a technical tour-de-force. It's a brilliant bit of code; binaries were completely cross-platform compatible. The same single executable ran on x86, ARM, MIPS, PowerPC, whatever, without any cumbersome bytecode interpreter or just-in-time compiler; Tao's VP code was converted on the fly into native machine code as it was loaded from disk.
However, with the world converging on X86, I'm not sure there's much need for it any more. SPARC and POWER and ARM are going their own ways; the desktop is now X86-only. Perhaps Taos' deep multithreading and very SMP-aware code might benefit it, but it didn't do BeOS much good.
Tao is dead and gone now. Amiga can't be far behind.
By Graham LockleyPosted Monday 7th January 2008 23:51 GMT
Who opened the door marked 'fringe lunatics' ?
If it wasnt bad enough with the usual MS/Linux/OSX nutters having a sniping war every now and then, we now have to watch out for this lot ! Any minute now and the Atarians will wade in closely followed by the Archimedeans....
Comments on: AmigaOS 5 surfaces... sort of
Hate to say it #
By Giles Jones Posted Monday 7th January 2008 09:28 GMT
Rubbish #
By Brett Saunders Posted Monday 7th January 2008 09:35 GMT
Another VM for portable devices #
By Matt Bucknall Posted Monday 7th January 2008 09:45 GMT
Clever stuff #
By James Le Cuirot Posted Monday 7th January 2008 11:02 GMT
Nothing to see... Move along. #
By Outcast Posted Monday 7th January 2008 11:41 GMT
More bullsh*t then #
By Lordlorddef Posted Monday 7th January 2008 13:26 GMT
How do you make money out of this? #
By Matt Bryant Posted Monday 7th January 2008 13:57 GMT
Yeah, right. #
By Peter Gordon Posted Monday 7th January 2008 14:17 GMT
Who cares??? #
By Gordon Posted Monday 7th January 2008 15:19 GMT
EyeAm condemns AmigaAnywhere2 as "Amiga OS" #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 7th January 2008 16:58 GMT
EyeAm condemns AmigaAnywhere2 as "Amiga OS" #
By Stephen Posted Monday 7th January 2008 16:58 GMT
Amiga is alive and kicking... #
By Raffaele Posted Monday 7th January 2008 17:21 GMT
@ Eyeam #
By Raffaele Posted Monday 7th January 2008 17:41 GMT
Taos lives on #
By Liam Proven Posted Monday 7th January 2008 18:00 GMT
Eyeam Escaped ? #
By Outcast Posted Monday 7th January 2008 18:10 GMT
Oh No ! #
By Graham Lockley Posted Monday 7th January 2008 23:51 GMT
Dream on #
By Andy Bright Posted Tuesday 8th January 2008 00:27 GMT
Minimig rulez #
By Graham Lerant Posted Tuesday 8th January 2008 00:29 GMT
@Graham #
By Peter Gordon Posted Tuesday 8th January 2008 07:54 GMT
Amiga OS4 in action. #
By Simon Preston Posted Tuesday 8th January 2008 20:44 GMT