By Richard LargePosted Monday 14th January 2008 18:22 GMT
I was hopeing something more like:
"Greetings lady and gentlemen. Welcome to MacWorld 2008! Now, we've realised that we sppare to have made a community that is one of the most annoying on earth. Therefore, could you please reach under your seats, pull out your brand new iKnife, and commit ritual Hari Kari."
Well, I can hope. (Can you tell I've had a bad- no, wose than usual day with the mac fans at work?)
By Webster PhreakyPosted Monday 14th January 2008 18:25 GMT
It's the ONLY thing that Apple Does well (their hardware / softrware is for $hit) and that's pimping the Media with crap to hype their Vaporous meeting of Kool Aid Drinkers at the Fruits - Nuts -n-Flakes Bowl that is MWSF.
By Pooper ScooperPosted Monday 14th January 2008 18:38 GMT
All you have to do is look at this section:
iPhone
- Sales beyond our wildest dreams
- Much more than the 1% market share we asked for in January
Total horseshit. Everyone knows that it's been selling like crap, there's no way they're at 10 million devices. Unless they're counting devices "sold" to Carphone Warehouse and the like, who are totally unable to move them to end-users.
By Mikael EimanPosted Monday 14th January 2008 18:40 GMT
I'd assume that a fifth version of the draft wouldn't have rather obvious problems like pushing the same point twice, like this one does with the app pricing för the Phone and Touch...
By Ben SchofieldPosted Monday 14th January 2008 18:43 GMT
...put that information on any web server, local or internet facing? Surely he'd have it on his computer and his little speech helpers would have it on theirs too; but there is no need for it to be anywhere else yet. If this is the real thing, then he wanted it to be 'leaked' - perhaps he thought it would be a publicity spinner for the expo. Who knows.
Personally, I think it's made up by that site to attract attention, which it seems to have done quite well.
By Marcus BointonPosted Monday 14th January 2008 18:43 GMT
The Mac Pro specs are those for the previous update. Neither 7300GT nor Quadro 4500 are available as an option. I'm surprised about the Mac Mini stuff, but the 320Gb drive option can't be real. Very suspicious, but interesting otherwise. I doubt that a consumer keynote would spend so much time on the iPhone SDK.
By Kevin SmithPosted Monday 14th January 2008 18:52 GMT
For starters the Mac Pro has already been put out there, the MacBook is very unlikely to get a refresh before the MacBook Pro, the magsafe adaptors are even more unlikely to have aluminium ends as this is likely to be a safety issue.
If this were real, it would probably have the sales figures, etc. in it rather than just say "Sales Figures". Besides, the real thing's probably kept locked up almost as secure as the gold in Ft. Knox.
By tranquilPosted Monday 14th January 2008 19:13 GMT
I'd actually be pretty happy with that list; mostly because my only Apple product is an iPod Touch, which appears to be a major fucus, and I adore last.fm. Ability to submit plays, and receive radio streams would finally start to make use of the device's capacity.
Getting The Orb on the device would be a pretty awesome too, and I imagine someone will design an app (although I understand this is possible already with a hacked software).
By William ThackreyPosted Monday 14th January 2008 19:24 GMT
This has all the earmarks of a hoax... and a rather poorly researched one at that. Most telling is that all existing models of MacBook and MacBook Pro are shipping "within 24 hours" from Apple and BTO configurations are shipping in the normal 1-3 days. If Apple replaces products in their product line, you almost always see them lean out the channel in advance.
A change to the MagSafe power adapter is highly unlikely unless there's a major design change or a safety issue. Changing the cable end to aluminum just doesn't make sense.
As others have pointed out, the Mac Pro was just refreshed and the "specs" here are incorrect. This is obvious rubbish.
By SpleenPosted Tuesday 15th January 2008 09:22 GMT
The content is irrelevant. Here is the post to Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Macworld_Conference_%26_Expo&diff=183215796&oldid=64332664. It's an anonymous post to a talk page with no attempt to claim authenticity. It's total rubbish, obviously completely made up. If it hadn't attracted a bunch of comments it would probably have been immediately removed, instead it took a couple of days (though it's still in the history - if it had been real, it would probably have been deleted).
Void Inside's reprinting it is a great example of the journalistic standards of the blogosphere. Shame that El Reg seems to think it has to follow suit.
Look out for next week's story: "Apparently, someone's friend Johnny is dumb and smells of pee. Source: Shiteforbrains.blogspot.com who cleverly spotted an edit to Talk:Sonic The Hedgehog on Wikipedia."
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 15th January 2008 09:24 GMT
It's fake as there's no mention of the 'Macs for all' scheme where if you go to an 11 hour seminar on why you should pay through your nose for Apple merchendise you get a free Mac.
Comments on: Steve Jobs' Macworld Expo spiel spied on web?
Ifs its real #
By Gareth Irwin Posted Monday 14th January 2008 17:42 GMT
Well... #
By Ed Posted Monday 14th January 2008 17:53 GMT
Mr Jobs does not do "Rough Drafts" #
By Neil Woolford Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:20 GMT
Bugger #
By Richard Large Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:22 GMT
Just More Pre-Macworld PR Pimping #
By Webster Phreaky Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:25 GMT
Of course it's fake #
By Pooper Scooper Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:38 GMT
Not likely, is it? #
By Mikael Eiman Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:40 GMT
Real Mac Pro specs #
By Christopher Cowan Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:41 GMT
Why would Jobs... #
By Ben Schofield Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:43 GMT
Mac Pro specs are wrong #
By Marcus Bointon Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:43 GMT
It's not real #
By Jasmine Strong Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:49 GMT
Lame #
By martin burns Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:51 GMT
A good effort but definitely fake. #
By Kevin Smith Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:52 GMT
I'm betting it's fake #
By Scott Posted Monday 14th January 2008 18:53 GMT
Depends what you were looking for #
By tranquil Posted Monday 14th January 2008 19:13 GMT
Sorry - not buying it #
By William Thackrey Posted Monday 14th January 2008 19:24 GMT
Faaaaaake! #
By Brad Posted Monday 14th January 2008 20:21 GMT
@Scott #
By Martin Posted Monday 14th January 2008 21:30 GMT
I know for a fact this is fake #
By Melissa Ter Posted Monday 14th January 2008 22:10 GMT
Very Funny #
By heystoopid Posted Monday 14th January 2008 23:10 GMT
Very poor #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 15th January 2008 02:45 GMT
Frankly obvious #
By Pascal Monett Posted Tuesday 15th January 2008 07:18 GMT
Fake #
By Klaus Cartesius Posted Tuesday 15th January 2008 07:37 GMT
Who the hell is taking this seriously? #
By Spleen Posted Tuesday 15th January 2008 09:22 GMT
Macs for all #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 15th January 2008 09:24 GMT
Very poor #
By Paul M. Posted Tuesday 15th January 2008 09:48 GMT