By Paul TalbotPosted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:22 GMT
I wish these kinds of surveys would stop now. Nobody's ever said that the Wii was a good substitute for proper exercise. All that's been said is that's it's much better than the traditional sitting-in-one-place-on-the-sofa style of gaming.
That's it. Anyone who thinks differently is pretty dumb and we don't need regular studies and surveys to prove the point. Want to lose weight or keep fit? Try real sports or the gym. Want a fun game that's better for you than sitting around watching TV? That's where the Wii comes in.
By GettinSaddaPosted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:28 GMT
The issue here is not which form exercise is the best per session, but which is likely to succeed.
Sure, a few people may happily "work out to a boxing video for 30 minutes" for a couple of days, but unless you are the sort of person that naturally finds exercise fun (so you probably don't need to lose weight) that's about as far as you could be bothered to go.
If the alternative is an addictive game that only gives, say 75% of the exercise, but keeps you doing it week after week, which is better?
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 24th January 2008 13:49 GMT
It's not like this was a sponsored study or anything. I could probably put money on the fact that, since it came out of a university, it was a student's project or group project with a report at the end. One of my projects was about how to design a robot that could explore Mars - made out of Lego. It didn't change the world but was aimed at developing the students ability to a) work as a team, b) learn generic skills at how to run a study.
Besides - a study like this allows us to use it in arguments with people who think the opposite as it's now been scientifically proven! And Paul, you do need studies to prove "the point" or any established fact. It's how we *know* that it's fact.
By Graham JordanPosted Thursday 24th January 2008 13:58 GMT
"Nova Scotia each played the console’s Wii Sports boxing game for 30 minutes. They also walked around a park AND worked out to a boxing video for 30 minutes each, as a comparison exercise"
And being the operative word there. No shit sherlock, if you're going to walk on top of a like minded exercise your bound to loose more weight?!
Who pays these people?! This isn't even GCSE material...
By Keith WilliamsPosted Thursday 24th January 2008 15:07 GMT
Yes, you are missing the point that the 3 exercises, Wii boxing, VS. Walking in the Park VS Boxing Video, were compared, not Wii boxing vs Walking in the park and the boxing video.
The article text is never to be taken as a trustworthy indication of whatever was done in any study, or even "study", so I guess applying truth table thinking to this is not of much value...
"your bound to loose more weight?!
Who pays these people?!"
I'd suspect nobody does -- students they were. But I'd be totally for not paying anybody who writes "loose" when they mean "lose" or, even worse, "your" instead of "you're".
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 25th January 2008 10:42 GMT
The boxing title certainly *can* get your heart rate up into decent CV rates. Like any form of exercise, it's about the effort you put into it. You can use an ergometer for half an hour and not break a sweat, or you can push it and get some benefit.
By Rob GemmellPosted Friday 25th January 2008 15:03 GMT
It doesn't give you hairy palms; I've done the study. And it was official because I had my lab coat on at the time.
With losing weight in general, it comes to your intensity while doing the activity. If you're playing the Wii and moving around and using your entire body, its more likely that you are getting slightly fit then someone who sits on the couch waving their arm around.
Note: I accept the captain obvious nominee in advance.
Comments on: Wii not the way to lose weight
Again? #
By Paul Talbot Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:22 GMT
You're missing the point... #
By GettinSadda Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:28 GMT
Lose Pounds instantly with Wii!!!! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:49 GMT
boxercise #
By Daren Cutland Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:54 GMT
Stop it! #
By Matt Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 13:29 GMT
Calm down, calm down #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 13:49 GMT
Am I missing something? #
By Graham Jordan Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 13:58 GMT
boxercise #
By Doug Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 14:41 GMT
Yes! #
By Tim Fischer Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 14:48 GMT
@Am I missing something? #
By Keith Williams Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 15:07 GMT
Personal research #
By Bunglebear Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 17:09 GMT
Do people read the article before commenting? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 19:27 GMT
Er... #
By J Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 21:40 GMT
What the hell? #
By Ed Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 21:52 GMT
No, you're missing the point... #
By Scott Posted Friday 25th January 2008 02:44 GMT
Re:What the hell? #
By Andy Worth Posted Friday 25th January 2008 08:44 GMT
Wii sports #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 25th January 2008 10:42 GMT
Further Research Required #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 25th January 2008 11:15 GMT
Re:Andy #
By Rob Gemmell Posted Friday 25th January 2008 15:03 GMT