By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:13 GMT
Um... I commend you for linking to one of only two (AFAIK) currently-available LCD monitors on the planet with WUXGA resolution which *aren't* 24" (although it looks like the CG221 is about to be replaced). Since I like my pixels small and my desk space existing, I'm a fan of the L220x, but it looks like the real monitor is an Eizo S2400W - which looks like a high end panel, but nothing exceptional - which could also be said of the rest of the system.
I hope, at least, that the case is acting as a passive cooling unit, and that it's completely silent? Otherwise, you'd think they'd have thrown in some higher-end components. Otherwise it looks like a £374,000 box with a £1000 middle-end PC (and low end graphics card) thrown in. You'd think it would be worth installing some high-end components just so they don't have to explain to the buyer why it just got its posterior handed to it by the purchaser's previous PC. Where are the kryo-cooling units when you need them?
But then the chances of someone buying this knowing anything about computers seem small.
By Morely DotesPosted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:15 GMT
Only 2GB RAM on a PC that expensive? It's all for show, then. Clearly, it's not intended to be sold to anyone who knows anything about PCs (the Vista OS is another giveaway).
By ChrisPosted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:20 GMT
Here I am clicking, thinking "Wow! Maybe this will have 16 cores and 64gb of RAM with 1gb L2 cache" etc etc.. nope, it's a a crap spec system that is enclosed with diamonds. Big f'ing deal.
By Alan LukaszewiczPosted Wednesday 30th January 2008 18:31 GMT
The first thought that occured to me is related to an earlier posting about Vist'a successor.
In that we considered dumping the "Windows" moniker and looked at "Microsoft Vienna" (Oh Vienna!, Ultravox and all that).
And now the thought occurs to me that MS Vista++ should have two forms. One is the general type open hardware platform that makes on OS run on non-ECC RAM and so forth (it keeps the lo-cost people happy) and the other is a top level, limited hardware variant (MS Vienna Top Class?) running along Apple hardware type model.
By Luiz AbdalaPosted Wednesday 30th January 2008 18:53 GMT
It is the most expensive stupid-wise, not spec-wise. Too bad that wasn´t clear. I thought it was the next Cray supercomputer to go. What a shame. Spending an infimate proportion of that I can buy a Falcon Northwest with everything on it.
It is like having a solid gold Volkswagen Beetle. Pfffttt. Pity.
Gold has worse thermal and electric properties than copper #
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 30th January 2008 20:21 GMT
Contrary to popular perceptions, copper has better thermal conductivity than gold and is only slightly behind first placed silver.The reason gold plating is used in connectors is that it doesn't get dull like copper or silver when in contact with air.
By Andy HardsPosted Wednesday 30th January 2008 21:40 GMT
To be honest I think that what ever numbnuts buys this if they ask for some extra and better bobbins inside to make it go faster or have better graphics then the manufacturers will probably agree to changing a few bits. It's not like you'll have some student doing his saturday job telling them that it's not possible because that's how it comes. If they can find someone stupid enough to buy one they'll be bending over backwards to make sure that they have it exactly as they want it.
Not being Pedantic or anything, but this is 2008, most of us have 2-3Tb storage - 1Tb could be more accurately descibed as "mediocre" or alternatively just "meh".
By Iain PurdiePosted Thursday 31st January 2008 08:59 GMT
...if you want XP installed instead of ****ing Vista. As many people have already said, though, this PC's definitely aimed at the "more money than sense" brigade. Frankly, for the use it probably is, they'd be as well selling the case with no components inside.
Comments on: Is this the world's most expensive desktop PC?
Jeez. #
By David S Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:01 GMT
Nice try #
By Tom Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:06 GMT
1920x1200 monitors #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:13 GMT
Not impressed #
By Morely Dotes Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:15 GMT
It doesn't need an optical drive #
By Simon Greenwood Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:15 GMT
But... #
By J Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:17 GMT
Ugh... #
By Chris Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:20 GMT
Or you could pay 5,000 GBP #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:20 GMT
Only 2GB? #
By Bronek Kozicki Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:22 GMT
2GB #
By Steve VanSlyck Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:24 GMT
overclock potential detected! #
By sam Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:28 GMT
And your homework today is #
By Inspector_Morse Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 17:43 GMT
Hmmm, interesting! #
By Alan Lukaszewicz Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 18:31 GMT
look @@ #
By john doe Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 18:41 GMT
@Sam #
By Steve Evans Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 18:45 GMT
Ahh.... #
By Luiz Abdala Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 18:53 GMT
Gold has worse thermal and electric properties than copper #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 20:21 GMT
PC obsolescence... #
By LaeMi Qian Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 20:52 GMT
Anyone this vain #
By Kris Chaplin Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 21:04 GMT
Spec? #
By Andy Hards Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 21:40 GMT
Dear God... #
By Franklin Posted Wednesday 30th January 2008 21:49 GMT
2GB Ram, Ugly, Vista? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 04:30 GMT
"Whopping" 1Tb? #
By Rob Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 08:14 GMT
Shame about the spec... #
By Dr Patrick J R Harkin Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 08:37 GMT
Bet they charge extra... #
By Iain Purdie Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 08:59 GMT
@ Dr Patrick J R Harkin #
By Ascylto Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 09:23 GMT