|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments on ‘B&O reveals self-calibrating robo TV’Thursday 31st January 2008 15:05 GMT
Slight problem...
Bert Ragnarok • Thursday 31st January 2008 15:14 GMT
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? I note that, not only is your spell-checker using US English, but it doesn't even know any Latin! Aren't I the smug b*st*rd. I'll get my toga. 4000 €, strange
Marc • Thursday 31st January 2008 15:34 GMT
Hmm - Listprice of the BeoVision 4 in Germany is 8423 Euros, plus VAT... The camera calibrates the TV so...
Anonymous Coward • Thursday 31st January 2008 15:34 GMT
...what calibrates the camera? Calibrating the camera
Phil Driscoll • Thursday 31st January 2008 15:38 GMT
Every 500 hours does a message come up on screen asking you to stick a well lit test card on the screen so the camera can calibibrate itself? Of course...
David Wiernicki • Thursday 31st January 2008 15:44 GMT
...it seems to me that having a self-calibrating TV is a bit stupid if you're going to watch the thing in a huge white room with a wall of windows. In that environment you'd be lucky to tell the difference between the B&O and the Wal-Mart store brand. Assuming they're not using the same panel anyway... B&O - typical
Graham Bartlett • Thursday 31st January 2008 16:35 GMT
Sounds about right for B&O, purveyors of overpriced tat to male yuppies with too much cash for their trouser pockets. If they want to rip off Tarquin Tax-Lawyer and Simon Stockbroker with yet another pointless willy-waving gadget, it's no skin off my nose. Imagine my surprise
Morely Dotes • Thursday 31st January 2008 17:16 GMT
You were talking about Bang & Olafsen. Here I was thinking the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad was branching out into etertainment electronics. Re: 4000 €, strange and B&O - typical
Anonymous Coward • Thursday 31st January 2008 17:39 GMT
Marc, it's quite possible that the model you look at is the big model (which is listed at €8000 RRP). And Graham, stop being a sour grape... B&O sound quality is top grade. Their headphones for example have the most fantastic sound (better than many others, including some Sennheiser models). I'm not the richest man on the planet, but I will pay for B&O quality stuff. @graham Bartlett
Anonymous Coward • Thursday 31st January 2008 18:02 GMT
I remember the B&O video recorders, a bog standard Hitachi machine with some fancy brushed aluminium and shiny black plastic bits stuck on. Oh, and a price tag that was three times the one on the equivalent Hitachi machine for sale in the shop a few doors away.. Still, someone has to separate yuppies and stupid people from their money. RE: Slight problem...
Cameron Colley • Thursday 31st January 2008 18:20 GMT
Erm, you are kidding about the spell check, right? Anon: Try Shure if you like quality earphones. Really?
Anonymous Coward • Thursday 31st January 2008 18:31 GMT
So can it save different values for each input? Does it make you go through all the inputs? Because the settings good for DVD are mostly useless for videogames or regular TV, and if you have vintage devices such as Laserdisc players or - gasp - a VCR you will definitely want separate picture values for those. I think this is pretty much a waste, as most people don't give a damn about properly setting up their TV, but out of the three people who do AND still buy B&O, one might be happy with this. So thumbs up for that guy, while the other two just set stuff by hand, spinning a copy of Video Essentials. Camera shy
David H • Thursday 31st January 2008 18:33 GMT
Wonder if the TV automatically switches channels if the camera sees that you're watching a cheap reality TV show? @Anonymous Coward
Alan Gregson • Thursday 31st January 2008 20:24 GMT
B & O never used Hitachi VCRs (which were pretty decent quality anyway) they used Philips & Panasonic. Nope, Anonymous Coward
Marc • Friday 1st February 2008 08:45 GMT
The 65 Inch model is 15828 € without the Control Unit. http://www.radio-ring.de/Preisliste_B_O_.pdf re: B&O using others components
Iain • Friday 1st February 2008 10:21 GMT
The B&O plasmas are (at least were, last time I looked) Panasonic panels, but they have their own, higher quality, electronics hanging off the back. So while the improvement over the Panny model is incremental, it's pretty clear if you look, particularly with standard-def sources. Their hifi equipment is excellent, and if you're spending that kind of money on something that looks flash, kicks that horrible Bose stuff all around the park for sound and build quality. @Cameron & anon
Bronek Kozicki • Friday 1st February 2008 11:58 GMT
Shure, like B&O. are off-the-shelf standard stuff. Try custom made Ultimate Ears, Sensaphonics or ACS if you want earphones ultimate in sound quality. Actually, B&O are kind of a joke in this context. @Bronek
Iain • Friday 1st February 2008 16:05 GMT
A quick Google puts a pair of their bottom-of-the-range custom earphones (UE 5 Pros) at a touch over £500. B&O Earphones are around £90. Yes, your professional monitors cost more money. There's ALWAYS a way to get better quality if you can afford it. That doesn't make the B&Os a joke in their own right, any more than their home audio range is just because a decent Meridian pre/pro setup is even better. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
Hot Product ReviewsSony Walkman S seriesMost Wanted TV
Data from Pricegrabber Review FinderAccessories
Price FinderTop Stories
Channels
On Other Register sites…
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||