By David WiernickiPosted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:44 GMT
...it seems to me that having a self-calibrating TV is a bit stupid if you're going to watch the thing in a huge white room with a wall of windows. In that environment you'd be lucky to tell the difference between the B&O and the Wal-Mart store brand. Assuming they're not using the same panel anyway...
By Graham BartlettPosted Thursday 31st January 2008 16:35 GMT
Sounds about right for B&O, purveyors of overpriced tat to male yuppies with too much cash for their trouser pockets. If they want to rip off Tarquin Tax-Lawyer and Simon Stockbroker with yet another pointless willy-waving gadget, it's no skin off my nose.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 31st January 2008 17:39 GMT
Marc, it's quite possible that the model you look at is the big model (which is listed at €8000 RRP).
And Graham, stop being a sour grape... B&O sound quality is top grade. Their headphones for example have the most fantastic sound (better than many others, including some Sennheiser models). I'm not the richest man on the planet, but I will pay for B&O quality stuff.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:02 GMT
I remember the B&O video recorders, a bog standard Hitachi machine with some fancy brushed aluminium and shiny black plastic bits stuck on. Oh, and a price tag that was three times the one on the equivalent Hitachi machine for sale in the shop a few doors away.. Still, someone has to separate yuppies and stupid people from their money.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:31 GMT
So can it save different values for each input? Does it make you go through all the inputs? Because the settings good for DVD are mostly useless for videogames or regular TV, and if you have vintage devices such as Laserdisc players or - gasp - a VCR you will definitely want separate picture values for those. I think this is pretty much a waste, as most people don't give a damn about properly setting up their TV, but out of the three people who do AND still buy B&O, one might be happy with this. So thumbs up for that guy, while the other two just set stuff by hand, spinning a copy of Video Essentials.
The B&O plasmas are (at least were, last time I looked) Panasonic panels, but they have their own, higher quality, electronics hanging off the back. So while the improvement over the Panny model is incremental, it's pretty clear if you look, particularly with standard-def sources.
Their hifi equipment is excellent, and if you're spending that kind of money on something that looks flash, kicks that horrible Bose stuff all around the park for sound and build quality.
By Bronek KozickiPosted Friday 1st February 2008 11:58 GMT
Shure, like B&O. are off-the-shelf standard stuff. Try custom made Ultimate Ears, Sensaphonics or ACS if you want earphones ultimate in sound quality. Actually, B&O are kind of a joke in this context.
A quick Google puts a pair of their bottom-of-the-range custom earphones (UE 5 Pros) at a touch over £500. B&O Earphones are around £90.
Yes, your professional monitors cost more money. There's ALWAYS a way to get better quality if you can afford it. That doesn't make the B&Os a joke in their own right, any more than their home audio range is just because a decent Meridian pre/pro setup is even better.
Comments on: B&O reveals self-calibrating robo TV
Slight problem... #
By Bert Ragnarok Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:14 GMT
4000 €, strange #
By Marc Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:34 GMT
The camera calibrates the TV so... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:34 GMT
Calibrating the camera #
By Phil Driscoll Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:38 GMT
Of course... #
By David Wiernicki Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:44 GMT
B&O - typical #
By Graham Bartlett Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 16:35 GMT
I thought the headline said B & Q... #
By xyz Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 16:53 GMT
Imagine my surprise #
By Morely Dotes Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 17:16 GMT
Re: 4000 €, strange and B&O - typical #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 17:39 GMT
@graham Bartlett #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:02 GMT
RE: Slight problem... #
By Cameron Colley Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:20 GMT
Really? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:31 GMT
Camera shy #
By David H Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:33 GMT
@Anonymous Coward #
By Alan Gregson Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 20:24 GMT
Nope, Anonymous Coward #
By Marc Posted Friday 1st February 2008 08:45 GMT
re: B&O using others components #
By Iain Posted Friday 1st February 2008 10:21 GMT
@Cameron & anon #
By Bronek Kozicki Posted Friday 1st February 2008 11:58 GMT
@Bronek #
By Iain Posted Friday 1st February 2008 16:05 GMT
Daleks? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 1st February 2008 21:57 GMT