Reg Hardware

Comments on: B&O reveals self-calibrating robo TV

Slight problem... 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:14 GMT

Coat

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

I note that, not only is your spell-checker using US English, but it doesn't even know any Latin!

Aren't I the smug b*st*rd.

I'll get my toga.

4000 €, strange 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:34 GMT

Hmm - Listprice of the BeoVision 4 in Germany is 8423 Euros, plus VAT...

The camera calibrates the TV so... 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:34 GMT

...what calibrates the camera?

Calibrating the camera 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:38 GMT

Coat

Every 500 hours does a message come up on screen asking you to stick a well lit test card on the screen so the camera can calibibrate itself?

Of course... 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 15:44 GMT

...it seems to me that having a self-calibrating TV is a bit stupid if you're going to watch the thing in a huge white room with a wall of windows. In that environment you'd be lucky to tell the difference between the B&O and the Wal-Mart store brand. Assuming they're not using the same panel anyway...

B&O - typical 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 16:35 GMT

Sounds about right for B&O, purveyors of overpriced tat to male yuppies with too much cash for their trouser pockets. If they want to rip off Tarquin Tax-Lawyer and Simon Stockbroker with yet another pointless willy-waving gadget, it's no skin off my nose.

I thought the headline said B & Q... 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 16:53 GMT

Coat

...I'll get me coat

Imagine my surprise 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 17:16 GMT

You were talking about Bang & Olafsen. Here I was thinking the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad was branching out into etertainment electronics.

Re: 4000 €, strange and B&O - typical 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 17:39 GMT

Marc, it's quite possible that the model you look at is the big model (which is listed at €8000 RRP).

And Graham, stop being a sour grape... B&O sound quality is top grade. Their headphones for example have the most fantastic sound (better than many others, including some Sennheiser models). I'm not the richest man on the planet, but I will pay for B&O quality stuff.

@graham Bartlett 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:02 GMT

Alert

I remember the B&O video recorders, a bog standard Hitachi machine with some fancy brushed aluminium and shiny black plastic bits stuck on. Oh, and a price tag that was three times the one on the equivalent Hitachi machine for sale in the shop a few doors away.. Still, someone has to separate yuppies and stupid people from their money.

RE: Slight problem... 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:20 GMT

Erm, you are kidding about the spell check, right?

Anon: Try Shure if you like quality earphones.

Really? 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:31 GMT

Thumb Up

So can it save different values for each input? Does it make you go through all the inputs? Because the settings good for DVD are mostly useless for videogames or regular TV, and if you have vintage devices such as Laserdisc players or - gasp - a VCR you will definitely want separate picture values for those. I think this is pretty much a waste, as most people don't give a damn about properly setting up their TV, but out of the three people who do AND still buy B&O, one might be happy with this. So thumbs up for that guy, while the other two just set stuff by hand, spinning a copy of Video Essentials.

Camera shy 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 18:33 GMT

Happy

Wonder if the TV automatically switches channels if the camera sees that you're watching a cheap reality TV show?

@Anonymous Coward 

Posted Thursday 31st January 2008 20:24 GMT

B & O never used Hitachi VCRs (which were pretty decent quality anyway) they used Philips & Panasonic.

Nope, Anonymous Coward 

Posted Friday 1st February 2008 08:45 GMT

The 65 Inch model is 15828 € without the Control Unit.

http://www.radio-ring.de/Preisliste_B_O_.pdf

re: B&O using others components 

Posted Friday 1st February 2008 10:21 GMT

The B&O plasmas are (at least were, last time I looked) Panasonic panels, but they have their own, higher quality, electronics hanging off the back. So while the improvement over the Panny model is incremental, it's pretty clear if you look, particularly with standard-def sources.

Their hifi equipment is excellent, and if you're spending that kind of money on something that looks flash, kicks that horrible Bose stuff all around the park for sound and build quality.

@Cameron & anon 

Posted Friday 1st February 2008 11:58 GMT

Shure, like B&O. are off-the-shelf standard stuff. Try custom made Ultimate Ears, Sensaphonics or ACS if you want earphones ultimate in sound quality. Actually, B&O are kind of a joke in this context.

@Bronek 

Posted Friday 1st February 2008 16:05 GMT

A quick Google puts a pair of their bottom-of-the-range custom earphones (UE 5 Pros) at a touch over £500. B&O Earphones are around £90.

Yes, your professional monitors cost more money. There's ALWAYS a way to get better quality if you can afford it. That doesn't make the B&Os a joke in their own right, any more than their home audio range is just because a decent Meridian pre/pro setup is even better.

Daleks? 

Posted Friday 1st February 2008 21:57 GMT

Alien

Those are some type of new model Dalek's in the corner of the room, aren't they.