By Phil IrwinPosted Friday 4th April 2008 08:51 GMT
Price....the single biggest thing that will stall Blu-Ray's adoption into the mainstream.
Not everyone can see the difference between normal DVD and Blu-Ray, so why would that group spend up to 50% more for the same movie on Blu-Ray over DVD?
Especially when upscaling is taken into account.
When the price of discs start dropping, I think we'll see more uptake.
That stat of 3.8m units includes all the set top boxes for existing standard-def tellies, though, so Camp Blu can't really take it as an indication of HDTV sales.
I'd like a Blu-ray player, because sooner or later I'm going to run out of films to watch on my HD-DVD box. But most people I know who aren't fellow film geeks, including several with HDTVs already, can't see the point in anything better than DVD.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 4th April 2008 10:44 GMT
So far I've got over 300 DVDs and am still buying my old faves. I'm certinaly not going to ditch that and start replacing them with DRM'd bluray. Also I've got a near £1000 cinema syatem and I'm not going to be ditching that anytime soon either.
I think i'll skip bluray and wait for the next format or wati until my current system dies, whichever comes sooner. Which i guess is waht many people are goign to be doing.
I find this a strange statement that keeps being made.
Nobody is being asked to ditch their DVDs (well maybe implied) as all HD players will play DVD and most will do a mighty fine job of upscaling them to HD.
Also, just plug the Blu Ray player in to your home cinema system. Nothing is replaced, jusy enhanced.
My personal position is. I don't have a HD TV, so no need for HD player. Will be buying a HD TV within the next 6 months and will probably get a PS3 as a HD movie player, media server/client and game system. No urgent need, probably like everybody else.
By Tony PaulazzoPosted Monday 7th April 2008 08:38 GMT
<"Not everyone can see the difference between normal DVD and Blu-Ray,..."
Why do people keep spouting this nonsense?>
Well, my HDTV is only 720p 1080i, and I won't be upgrading for a long time (my last telly (28in widescreen) lasted me some 6 years (gave it to my brother as it's still good but I have to keep my geek alive).
Yeah, HD is better, 'Serenity' looks glorious, 'The Thing' reminds me of watching it in the cinema all those years ago, but in all honesty, 'Lord of the Rings' and 'King Kong' DVD look fan-bloody-tastic on my new TV. The difference between the two isn't THAT staggering.
Now if it had been HD3D (high definition in 3 dimensions and 7.1 Dolby surround sound), that would probably have rocked the marketplace...
"Not everyone can see the difference between normal DVD and Blu-Ray,..."
You must have a REALLY crappy television if you cannot see the difference. Did you buy your television from Morrisons, Asda, Lidl or Aldi by any chance?
By Scott MckenziePosted Monday 7th April 2008 09:23 GMT
Sadly a lot of people *did* buy their TV for £200 from somewhere crappy... though generally they still display a pretty good HD picture.
BR will get popular when it's cheaper on the street... at the moment you can buy online for 30-40% less than the high street, that will come in time i'm sure, but mass adoption is a while away. I'm personally happy buying up HD DVD's for £5 a time!
Where are you finding the £5 HD DVDs? The best I've found so far is Play.com's 3 for £20 offer. Although, having just found Pan's Labyrinth in HMV for £10, I've got most of the UK discs I'm particularly after, apart from the really recent releases that aren't reduced at all yet.
Comments on: Blu-ray awareness rising
I wish I had enough spare money... #
By Dr Patrick J R Harkin Posted Friday 4th April 2008 08:31 GMT
Price #
By Phil Irwin Posted Friday 4th April 2008 08:51 GMT
"Freeview branded hardware" #
By Iain Posted Friday 4th April 2008 10:24 GMT
of course we're not buying!! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 4th April 2008 10:44 GMT
@AC - ditch DVD #
By Albert Posted Friday 4th April 2008 11:34 GMT
@Phil Irwin #
By PIB Posted Friday 4th April 2008 17:52 GMT
Here in the UK #
By Tony Paulazzo Posted Monday 7th April 2008 08:38 GMT
@Phil Irwin #
By Mark Posted Monday 7th April 2008 08:58 GMT
@MArk #
By Scott Mckenzie Posted Monday 7th April 2008 09:23 GMT
@Scott #
By Iain Posted Monday 7th April 2008 13:27 GMT