|
|||||||||||
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 mobile 'Penryn' processor14th April 2008 11:02 GMT In a straight head-to-head in PCMark05 there was nothing to choose between the two processors, which is much as you'd expect. The Penryn processor has only a tiny advantage in this benchmark as it is a couple of years old and doesn’t use SSE 4. It was a similar story in 3DMark06 which is, of course, a graphics test. The overall score was the same for both processors, although the CPU element was very slightly better for the Penryn. PCMark05 Results
Longer bars are better 3DMark06 Results
Longer bars are better The POV-Ray graphics rendering test showed Penryn in a better light as the new core is more efficient than Merom, but it’s unlikely that many people will use their Rock laptop to render pro graphics. POV-Ray 3.7 Beta 25 Results
Time in Seconds
These three tests show the highest increase in performance you're going to get in games, which are typically limited more by the GPU than the CPU. So, yes, you'll get a higher framerate with the T9500 than the T7800, but not a significantly higher one. |
Review of the WeekSony Ericsson Cyber-shot C902Most Wanted Laptops
Data from Pricegrabber Review FinderLaptops
Price FinderTop Stories
Channels |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||