By Buff FlexingtonPosted Friday 9th May 2008 12:28 GMT
It keeps getting more confusing as time goes on.
It used to be a GTS was faster than a GT.
The 8 series changed that. the GTS came first and the GT was an improvement on the GTS w/ a die shrink & price cut.
They would do well to look at BMW for an idea of how to name their chips.
330i
330is
s is the sports model, so they could add a letter at the end if the card is factory overclocked. Otherwise, if they just stuck to numbers; it would make the cards easier. Everyone knows 9 is higher than 5. Not everyone knows the difference between GTS & GTX
My 7800 isn't a 7800 anyway (they wouldn't allow the name on an agp card) #
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 9th May 2008 14:36 GMT
NVidia needs to give up on numbers I think they have run out anyway!
Time for the next Gen.
And remebmer sequential! or explanatory! not jibber jabber!
That would be a good example, if BMWs weren't already poorly named.
BMW 335i = 3 litre turbo
BMW 325i = 3 litre n/a
Now if BMW can't be expected to number their products according to the amount of oomph you can squeeze out of them, should nvidia have to? Admittedly Nvidia's naming is a helluva lot more vague, and the resultant differences between products not always as obvious as in a beamer.
Paris, because she'd just buy the pretty one with the drop-top.
Comments on: Nvidia exec admits GPU line-up is numerically 'challenged'
Keeps getting more confusing #
By Buff Flexington Posted Friday 9th May 2008 12:28 GMT
My 7800 isn't a 7800 anyway (they wouldn't allow the name on an agp card) #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 9th May 2008 14:36 GMT
@ Buff Flexington #
By alex Posted Monday 12th May 2008 00:01 GMT