Reg Hardware

Comments on: Boffins' breakthrough boosts fuel cell output by 50%

Boffins 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 09:56 GMT

Do you need to constantly refer to scientists as "boffins"?

Re: Boffins 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 10:01 GMT

(Written by Reg staff.)

Yes we do. It's standard procedure. What's your point?

Step by step 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 10:03 GMT

We are coming closer to the Star Wars energy pack. One small cigarette box that can power anything from a blaster to a pair of Radon-Ulzer 620c turbines, or even a lightsaber.

It's the wait that's killing me.

@ Paul 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 10:05 GMT

Standard procedure; and accurate to boot!

bof·fin also Bof·fin

n. Chiefly British Slang

A scientist, especially one engaged in research.

Mad scientists? 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 10:07 GMT

Beardies?

Boffins 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 10:17 GMT

Seems perfectly reasonable to me;

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boffin

And *don't* bother quoting the Wikipedia reference back at me. I lend it no credence.

Boffin 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 10:24 GMT

Dead Vulture

theres an island off ireland called inish"bofin". i dont think its full of scientists though.

http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=53.617968,-10.199175&spn=0.038846,0.098448&z=14

maybe cos its missing an F

@ Jon 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 11:03 GMT

Beardies are Unix admin surely...

Boffin, a term devalued. 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 11:25 GMT

I wouldn't mind if the word Boffin was actually used as slang for research scientists, but these days, your average tabloid journalist uses it for any body who does any kind of research or might vaguely be called a scientist.

In fact the red tops seem to think anyone more intelligent that their readership is a Boffin, which makes my cat Einstein.

Weed? 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 11:40 GMT

Happy

First thing I though when I saw the pic - Some fed holding a small bag of weed.

A second longer looking I saw it wasnt a baggy at all! Now it just looks like a sweet wrapper.

I dunno, maybe better showing us a sciency diagram pic instead of that ambiguous thing.

BTW Interesting article.

@Tom 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 11:48 GMT

You're thinking of "Weirdy Beardies".

There's a Baffin island, maybe that's where they come from?

@Anonymous Coward 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 11:59 GMT

They don't have any doctors there either. I once had to be ferried off with concussion.

@ which makes my cat Einstein. 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 12:28 GMT

ahh I knew a cat is called Einstien too!

Small point... 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 15:34 GMT

Alert

"sulfonated tetrafluorethylene copolymer"

Shouldn't that be sulphonated or is that battle lost?

I for one welcome our aluminum over-lords.

@ Small Point... 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 16:09 GMT

No sulfonated is correct, it is the sulfur contain group in the polymer....

More Boffiness.... KC

why not distilled water hydrogen PEM fuel cell tech ? to take advantage of this 50% increase 

Posted Tuesday 20th May 2008 21:48 GMT

this 50% increase in fuel cell tech is great but why are they looking to use flamable methanol fuel cell tech for laptops and other small portable kit, when theres already distilled water hydrogen PEM fuel cell tech ?

http://www.h-tec.com/education/english/technologie_brennstoff.asp?id=314

http://www.h-tec.com/education/english/sub_produkte/demonstration_exhibition.asp?id=221-

sure hydrogen is more flamable in bulk ,BUT, these units only convert and use tiny amounts at a time compared to the far higher amouts required in carrying Methanol canisters...

and at a pinch you can make your own distilled water for use in these water PEM very easlly.

perhaps it comes down to no margins in it for the distributers, as per petrol there needs to be a profit in it perhaps.

OC in this single PEM case, your average users might not mind paying a premium in less expensive distilled water, as apposed more expensive methanol fuel cell tech running costs.

Re: @ Small Point… 

Posted Wednesday 21st May 2008 01:05 GMT

Stop

It's spelled "sulphur".

While we're being pedantic 

Posted Wednesday 21st May 2008 06:25 GMT

Stop

...about the spelling of sulphur, what's with this "more intelligent that their readership". The comparative conjunction is THAN not THAT. I see this mistake more and more these days and can't figure out why.

Sulphur - A battle lost. 

Posted Wednesday 21st May 2008 10:42 GMT

Unhappy

The RSC have picked sulfur and I guess they should know.

http://www.rsc.org/delivery/_ArticleLinking/DisplayArticleForFree.cfm?doi=JM99101FP055&JournalCode=JM

A sad day indeed, I'll be on the aluminium ramparts if you need me.