By Tony Smith, Editor, Reg HardwarePosted Thursday 5th June 2008 14:12 GMT
I did try it with VHS, but the results were no better than those achieved with other sources: interlacing artefacts on videotape material, heavy compression effects etc. Again, though, it's watchable when scaled down on a portable device.
However, it did reliably reproduce all the tape drop-outs. :-)
By Vladimir PlouzhnikovPosted Thursday 5th June 2008 14:27 GMT
The "worst-case interlacing" in 720x576 is actually the best case, as it preserves both fields without trying to deinterlace the frame. This video can then be encoded to MPEG2 and burned on a DVD with minimal loss of quality. The anamorphic flag can also be set during the MPEG2 encoding or even after, with Restream, so that's not a big deal. As can be seen from the 640x480 sample, the internal deinterlacer is a total write-off though...
The quality of compression is difficult to gauge without seeing the original uncompressed source. The quality of TV broadcast can be awful these days.
For £80, I am tempted. I doubt we will see a RGB input version, as I would definately pick one of those puppies up, I need something to "suck" stuff out my rapidly filling SkyHD box at hald decent quality, so I can stick it onto DVD.
By Christian BergerPosted Friday 6th June 2008 05:51 GMT
Of course 640x480 will give you problems. It needs to be scaled and who in their right minds would want to scale video to such odd resolutions.
The review misses some _very_ important points. How does the device react to slightly off standard video? This is, in fact the most important point as every video stream is slightly off standard.
Many solutions have the problem of not getting video and audio in sync if the framerate is not precisely 25fps. Others have problems with dropouts.
By Jan-Erik FinnbergPosted Friday 6th June 2008 06:08 GMT
Did you try to convert the captured video to MPEG2, burning it on a DVD and watching it on a TV? That's what I was planning on using it, archiving 15-year-old home videos to a digital format. I doubt that even the device's compression and the subsequent recompression to MPEG2 significantly degrades the quality when compard to the VHS original.
And I agree with Vladimir Plouzhnikov about the interlacing. Capture the video faithfully as interlaced and deinterlace it afterwards, if you want progressive video.
I think I'll wait for the hauppauge hd pvr thanks #
By rentagasPosted Friday 6th June 2008 11:11 GMT
Not terribly inspiring really the HD PVR wiill do all this AND compress 1080i for $250 (OK it sends H264 down USB to a computer) but that's what I'm waiting for.
Comments on: Pinnacle Video Transfer
Did you try it with VHS? #
By Natalie Gritpants Posted Thursday 5th June 2008 13:05 GMT
I'm hardcore #
By Funky Dennis Posted Thursday 5th June 2008 13:48 GMT
@Natalie #
By Tony Smith, Editor, Reg Hardware Posted Thursday 5th June 2008 14:12 GMT
Judgement's reserved... #
By Vladimir Plouzhnikov Posted Thursday 5th June 2008 14:27 GMT
Almost temped. #
By Mark Posted Thursday 5th June 2008 16:20 GMT
Not a good review #
By Christian Berger Posted Friday 6th June 2008 05:51 GMT
Re: "VHS" and "Judgement's reserved" #
By Jan-Erik Finnberg Posted Friday 6th June 2008 06:08 GMT
I think I'll wait for the hauppauge hd pvr thanks #
By rentagas Posted Friday 6th June 2008 11:11 GMT