800FSB what a joke, Intel's FSB is a big bottleneck #
By Doug LynnPosted Monday 16th June 2008 14:26 GMT
I wouldn't own a Intel Chip and refuse to advertise Intel due to their alleged antitrust behavior, which as a computer reseller, I have seen evidence of. AMD is still more innovative than Intel with a discrete quad core desktop and server CPU. The new Puma laptop is better than Intel. Its time for Intel to play fair.
Apple iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB DDR2, 1TB, DVD+-RW DL, Mac OS X v10.5 Snow Leopard, 27" LCD)
HP (Hewlett-Packard) Compaq Presario CQ5210F Mini-Tower Desktop (2.7GHz Athlon 64 X2 215, 3GB DDR2, 500GB, DVD±RW DL, Windows 7 Home Premium)
Velocity Micro Edge Z30 Midsize Desktop (2.66GHz Intel Core i5 750, 4GB DDR3, 500GB HDD, DVD±RW DL, Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit)
HP (Hewlett-Packard) Pavilion p6240f Mini-Tower Desktop (2.5GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300, 8GB DDR3, 750GB HDD, DVD±RW DL, Windows 7 Home Premium)
MSI Wind Top AE2010-02SUS All-In-One Desktop (1.5GHz Athlon 64 X2 3250e, 4GB DDR2, 320GB, DVD±RW DL, Windows Vista Home Premium, 20" LCD)
Comments on: Intel preps low-cost two-, four-core challenge to AMD's Phenom X3
800FSB what a joke, Intel's FSB is a big bottleneck #
By Doug Lynn Posted Monday 16th June 2008 14:26 GMT