By HorridblokePosted Tuesday 17th June 2008 14:58 GMT
If you're a sufficiently casual user to be happy with something of this spec (and millions are) you'd probably prefer an Eee for its portability (no computer desk taking up space in the spare bedroom)...
... unless the "cloud" element is really really special. Which it probably isn't.
By Rik HemsleyPosted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:05 GMT
When I moved from a 266Mhz PII to a 600Mhz PIII with 512MB KDE ran smoothly and I was perfectly happy with the speed of the desktop. A 400Mhz Freescale should be decent enough to use as a desktop machine, so there's no need for the sneering in the article.
I hate their website so much I want to incinerate an orphange with fiery puppies #
By Mr FuryPosted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:07 GMT
I sat through a tedious flash animation to be given diddly squat information, that always gives me a sunny disposition to a company.
And their logo resembles a freshly whipped pair of testicles.
Paris - because she's flashy, devoid of useful information and has doubtlessly seen reddened testicles.
Is it just me or is that cherry logo just begging for a little tippex modification to resemble certain body parts. Assuming kids still use tippex, not as much fun since they changed the thinners into something less mind-expanding. When I were a lad etc, etc....
By FluffykinsPosted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:20 GMT
Can we please not have preferential marketing here, please?
We need a picture incorporating a suitably decorative totty draped over a Cherry box on a beach somewhere.
OK, if the Cherry guys can't oblige, then the Cherry box isn't a mandatory requirement, just so long as the caption makes it clear the aforementioned totty is not draped over a Cherry box.
There, that should do it.
And I also want to be the first to get a cheap laugh out of mentioning "Totty" and "Showing a cherry" in the same sentence.
By AlastairPosted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:57 GMT
Is it just my childhood-like innocence, or isn't it just some cherries?! Sure you could say they look like balls if you want but I think you're grasping for something that's not there. So to speak.
As for the box, colour me sceptical- especially of the graphics performance. If it can do what jobby says it can it could even work as my new media playing box. Bet it won't, though.
It gives a pretty good overview of the experience you can expect from this sort of device. Another one with similar performance is the BeagleBoard (http://beagleboard.org/).
BUT: so far I haven't seen any non-x86 devices of this sort that support respectable screen resolutions; like most of the ARM-based systems, the Freescale chip in this box manages only 1024x768. How many of the potential users will be satisfied with that on a desktop? If you want 1600x1200 the VIA x86-based chipsets, or similar things from AMD and Intel, remain the only options.
I mean the addition of "addled" to imply (or allow the inference of) something rotten or confused and vague about Mac OS X ... which seems odd considering your normal Apple neutral alignment and good custom of Apple Inc.
Has something caused a new cut (bias 8-) to the fabric of your Apple world?
Most low end pdas or gps devices on the market now have a 400mhz arm risc processor and a sd card slot for gbs of memory. Sounds identical to this with less ports. Boots in seconds running windows ce. So unless this is extremIy cheap I can't really see the originality.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 17th June 2008 20:14 GMT
I've got a VGA port on the back of my LCD TV, and a wireless keyboard that I don't use much. I might consider springing for one of these to get a web browser in the living room. (Though maybe I'd be better off putting the cash towards one of those "media extenders" instead).
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 17th June 2008 20:59 GMT
"Of course, you'll probably have to factor in the standard US > UK conversion so you may as well change the $ for a £"
At least one vendor - Apple, seems to have understood it annoys anyone outside the USA, particularly those in the UK, that we were being ripped off when converting US prices. Hence Steve Jobs' commitment to fix prices of the basic iPhone at $199 (if he keeps his keynote speech promise). Oh, I don't own a single Apple product - not yet.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 17th June 2008 23:24 GMT
people need to start installing monitors and keyboards into coffee houses.
I cannot help thinking this device is a little ahead of its time. Most who want a small computer buy mini or nano-itx and just build one. But, without the peripherals this is going to be a hard sell to the average consumer.
Clock speeds have never been that accurate, I would prefer to see MIPs or bogomips even, so what if the chip oscillates at a certain frequency, I want to know how many instructions it can pump through in a second.
Could be useful for clustering though, if it is cheap enough, but I do feel visual technology needs to make the leap (laser keyboards are about, so input has done its bit, it is output's turn now). Where is our holographic display or cheap small projectors.
sorry but cheap, green and completely unremarkable won't move boxes... Anybody else remember the hype of "Network Computers" back in the early to mid 90's? They were interesting for about 30 seconds and then reality set in.
If they want this thing to run iTunes, the lack of storage space is one issue. The fact it's running linux is going to be another blocker. Or have Apple decided to hug the penguin of late, and I've missed it?
Still, good luck to them. It should be perfect for some situations (as with the new range of laptots out there). If this thing does take off, it'll be interesting to watch MS give XP a further reprieve in the hope of staying relevant.
By Ashlee VancePosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 00:37 GMT
Yeah, that's exactly what I asked Seybold, regarding the local storage and apparently missing iTunes for Linux. I dunno. He had some weird smile when he answered the question. The only thing I can guess is some cloud like thing where you're storing the songs somewhere else, but I can't imagine why Apple would agree to that or why anyone would want it.
By Mathew WhitePosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 02:32 GMT
While the unit may consume 2 watts of power, I'm guessing that the power adaptor that runs it uses about 20, most of which going off as heat.
Why not just get an iBookG4 off ebay (ignoring the ones with the gpu-o-death) and mod it yourself? you get more ports, and you have the fun of ripping an iBook apart - with a LCD, CD-R/DVD, WiFi, Microphone, Trackpad, keyboard, (and modem if your being really over zealous) - left over.
I've seen boxes like this for ages now, and they have never taken off.
By Craig RingerPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 03:13 GMT
This has "great thin client" (be it LTSP with remote X11, RDP/ICA, or RFB/VNC) written all over it - except for one little problem.
DVI.
Without a digital display option it's really not attractive for much except use as a firewall in some limited situations, as a low-power home server, or with some crappy cast-off screen as a workstation for someone you don't like very much.
As for firewalls, it turns out that the eee PC is an awfully good choice, at least if you have a VLAN switch or only care about wifi. I'm using mine as a great little ubuntu firewall/router/server and wifi access point. Once connected up to a 1TB USB HDD it does an impressive job as a file server. It runs silently with very low power consumption once you enable CPU power management, and it has plenty of grunt to spare when it's required. The built-in battery backup, keyboard, and display is just a bonus.
By Charles ManningPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 03:16 GMT
2W is one thing, but you need to look at the system power. Add a monitor and you're using more power than most laptops.
Still, good to see another company that is not wed to Windows. The only reason EeePC uses x86 is for windows. Going with ARM, even a PPC gives far better power figures and pricing than any x86 - even the Atom.
Break from x86 and low power/cost is much easier. For instance, the Atmel AT91SAM9G20 (400MHz ARM) only uses 80mW and costs $7. Add more power and cost for the RAM, flash etc.
By ShinkuPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 03:17 GMT
The name reminds me of that CherryOS, the ripoff PearPC PPC emulator clone. I guess they share nothing in common other than the apparent ability to run iTunes but it just seemed interesting.
Me? I'll just keep my ol' dual-floppied Apricot with the glowing green monochrome monitor for when I'm feeling fruity.
Dead birdy 'cos it looks like he's just dribbling cherry hooch.
By Oliver JonesPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 08:16 GMT
Back in the day when the Amiga was wowing everyone with a multitasking desktop, it had only 1MB of RAM (if you were lucky) and a 7MHz 68000. Worse, the graphics chipset only had a bandwidth of around 10MB/sec - most hard disc controllers today could trounce that! The cheapest of graphics chipsets today would make the Amiga's abilities back then seem laughable now.
If you were clever, and wrote an operating system to the hardware (just without going off on a tangent like Apple has done), you could quite easily make a machine fly on a 400MHz processor - and still have power to spare. Face it, most of the reasons we've needed multi-GHz PCs in the last 10 years have been done to one thing: Microsoft Windows.
We've come so far, so quickly - yet everyone seems to have such short memories...
Who cares about graphics! Use a proper PC / games console / pack of cards for that. However, I've started to hate the fan noise and heat that computers and other electrical stuff chucks out, and if I'm going to leave a computer on, I want all that to go away.. If this thing uses 2W, it's probably fanless, and I could leave it on happily to handle my backups - hang a couple of disks off it, install Subversion and you're done :) Add a screen and the kids could use it for web access as well.
More manufacturers should at least try to keep power usage and software bloat down. I bought a laptop last year that shuts off every now and then when it overheats, because the fan's not efficient enough, and can barely run Vista, which it shipped with. Rubbish!
Skull and crossbones because Windows will be a thing of the past in 10 years.
By Richard HendersonPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 08:56 GMT
He mentioned IP, which means venture capitalists, which means it is a dead duck. I'm guessing some awful lock-in to some net-based service. It's a goner....<quack>
By Gavin NottagePosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 09:05 GMT
Just to say it needs a DVI output, and the specs of the Ethernet aren't clear, but it really should be gigabit. Then it starts to make sense as a little box for a non-power user who lives with a power user. Or it could go in a kitchen etc where 1024x768 is OK.
I cant fathom how storage on the Cherry affects the storage capacity of my MP3 Player?? If I can get tunes from web2pod by using the cherry then why do i need PC storage? (yeah backup yadda yadda but not critical!)
@John Robson - USB-NIC not good enough for your internet connection? please tell me who your ISP is! there may be a driver issue though.
My reason for posting...
anyway if this thing will stream video from my NAS then I'll velcro it to the back of the TV in a jiffy! sold.
(wot no dvi/video port - well my tv has a vga connector so who cares!)
By Anon KowardPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 10:10 GMT
The one major drawback for this device compare to a normal PC or even that new low-powered PC that was being bandied about ASUS EEUC (or whatever the acronym is), is that this device is not flexible.
Lets not forget the fundamental reason PC's took off so quickly over Mac's in the old days was due to flexibility of use, by the details that i read in this article it would appear that this device is only ever going to cover a niche market.
I can't see any mainstream business opening up their firewalls to allow this device to run those necessary apps like Outlook etc, (forget iTunes!), which means it has already limited itself and isn't flexible.
What about future upgrades of HW, but a new CherryPal every few years?
It just doesn't appear to be that that flexible, I think this CEO missed a trick, the market isn't crying out just for a green low wattage device, they are crying out for a green low wattage PC that still has flexibility...
By Frank BoughPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 10:29 GMT
...but this little fella needs a nice, modern HDMI port instead. And by 'cloud', I rather assume that the idea is to buy 5, 10 or more of these things, put them on the same LAN and have them share the CPU load - it really could be quite cool in the right application.
'and other laptots'?? dare I ask what laptots are? sounds a bit wrong if you ask me.
honestly, the amount of typos in El Reg is comparable to The Grauniad. Do you guys not have spellcheckers? You'll need to change your name to 'The Regsiter' soon. Or 'El Rge'?
Anybody who finds these interesting should have a look at a Soekris box.
The fastest runs at 500Mhz and half a gig of RAM, and costs a little over €300 (more like €400, about £300, when you get through all the charges).
They are amazing little boxes for running as home servers / firewalls etc. They are upgradable, having hard drive connectors, PCI / mini PCI and USB connectors built in, plus they have 4 ethernet cards.
The only thing they lack compared to these cherries is a VGA connector (you can add a PCI card) and they use more like 10W, but that shouldn't matter compared to a normal 400W or so PC.
Mine runs OpenBSD a hell of a lot faster than any Windows PC I've ever seen and it won't randomly delete your backups like Windows Home Server...
If you want a PC substitute I think you can forget about these types of devices, but for a little data server, firewall, router etc I haven't seen anything better.
Plus, for Jamie Kephalas, the website doesn't play any stupid audio...
By Steven RaithPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 14:23 GMT
Matt, laptots was one of the phrases bandied around a few weeks ago when the whole small, cheap computers thing kicked off with the Atom EeePCs, Acer One, etc - as opposed to a peados portable PC, or something.
I like the idea of something like this that I can hook my half terabyte drive [and any future storage] up to over USB, and map into over NFS or SAMBA from my crappy old lappy without having to worry about my main PC drawing a couple of hundred watts 24/7. I dare say it would make a perfectly usable DHCP/DNS server too. Which would save my d-link router from needing restarted after heavy torrenting sessions when the onboard DNS passthrough thingy seems to shit itself.
Not to mention the tinkering options, and the non-x86 architecture which makes me go 'ooh' for no thoroughly explained reason.
By storng.bare.duridPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 14:38 GMT
End the x86 domination. Now.
:)
( Now if only someone would continue to develop desktop ppc64 type chip and build some machines and sell em. Don't worry about the OS, we'll linuxify it or something! )
By Christos GeorgiouPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 15:22 GMT
I own a Fit PC ( www.fit-pc.com ). A bought another for a friend. A company I know bought several units, because they are selling haematological analysers, and since they have to sell PCs too to run the analyser SW, they prefer to *fully include* the PC inside the analyser enclosure; yes, it also runs Windows. Mine runs Gentoo, heavily customised for my needs, and 198MiB of its 256 MiB RAM are still left for disk caching.
By Snert LeePosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 17:52 GMT
I'd think the major reason for iTunes compatibility is that they plan to market to the same style driven, form over function segment of the market that iPods and iPhones are pitched at.
Perhaps they're working on some sort of hosted iTunes back end with a Firefox extension for the front end. ( http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/eng/700182570.html )
By Snert LeePosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 18:04 GMT
A little grassroots marketing?
Writers/Bloggers/Students wanted for tech startup marketing (free computer and appealing compensation model)We are a new vendor of ultra-low cost (price of an iPod), highly energy efficient (very green), super fast (same performance characteristics as a $3,000 Mac or PC), new generation of desktop/laptop computers.We are going to build the brand based on our core values, inexpensive, green, user-friendly and last but not least open. Open in our world means open source software applications as well as open communication; a consumer brand that encourages users to share ideas and influence the roadmap of future product releases.The products will be launched in July ... with a really big bang!!!We are looking for "Brand Angels" who can spread the word through social networks like Facebook, MySpace, and others.Last but not least - we have very interesting compensation models (including stock option plans) in place. You will receive our product for FREE, and we rely on you to share your experiences through social networking sites/blogs. We will compensate you for promoting our product.Want to be a part of this "cheap/green/easy" consumer desktop/laptop success story by promoting a company that believes in sustainable living?We look forward to hearing from you.
By Nexox EnigmaPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 18:29 GMT
I've actually convinced some people short on real computers to set up a single port firewall by combining their residential gateway with a Linux box. The Linux firewall runs dhcpd, tells clients to use it as their main gateway, then has it's own gateway set as the linksys/dlink/netgear/whichever. Not elegant, but functional, and you can still use the wifi ap built in.
If you're looking for low power firewalls though, MSI makes a mini itx w/ a 500mhz geode cpu. The cpu itself consumes so little power that it doesn't even need a heatsink, and obviously no fan. The board has dual gbit ports, mini pci slot for a high power wifi adaptor, bootable cf card slot, and takes some form of cheapish ram. power consumption would probably mostly depend on how beefy of a wifi card you loaded in there, but I do imagine it'd be low, plus with the cf card you could go with absolutely no moving parts. Obviously I dearly want one of these boards... but my ancient donated 500MHz PIII HP desktop seems to still be working alright.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 18th June 2008 19:10 GMT
Grow up, kids. The Reg is getting better about limiting the stupid sophomorics in article titles, how about some corresponding improvement in the Comments section?
Just how bored do you have to be to point out phallic symbols in computer logos? (At least references to the AT&T "Death Star" logo were entertaining.)
And this Paris Hilton thing? Yeah, I could drop her name jokingly as if I were in some way personally familiar with her, but who would I be fooling?
Yours curmudgeonly,
Anonymous Codger
P.S. I hope nobody ever illustrates a Reg article with a Georgia O'Keefe painting.
These people are fn brilliant. They sell these things in the developing world. Out of the box it only does one thing: surfs porn (err.. the "web"). Everyone buys them just for that. And then CherryPal can sell to this install base Terminal Services. Besides porn, you can have Office, Photoshop. HELL you can even have Crysis (with StreamMyGame). Without going out to the internet cafe, that is.
(On top of that there's an ulterior factor: telcos like China Telecom need to move away from piss-poor voice by offering other services, and are looking to jump into thin clients hooked to their DSL lines.)
Only problem is that these app subscriptions will have to compete with free. The free you'll get by forking for real hardware and pirating all the apps from your friends.
But it's not about apps. Not yet. Now they just want you to to buy the machine and keep it in your bedroom.
By Henry WertzPosted Thursday 19th June 2008 04:23 GMT
I think CherryPal's greatly exaggerating the performance, and they really shouldn't.. they'll have people benchmark it and simply tear them a new one. But, as long as the CPU and chipset are reasonably modern, a dual-core 400mhz PowerPC-based setup should be quite pleasant as a desktop. And it's hard to argue with 2 watts.
By Ben BurchPosted Friday 20th June 2008 17:41 GMT
I have a number of things that HAVE to run all day and which are just not CPU-intensive and for which this is a great solution. These things currently run in an ancient 600 MHz iMac and are all running in the command-line layer. They will port just fine to Linux!
Comments on: CherryPal out sweetens Apple with 2W, ultra-cheap PC
Cherries are sweeter than apples - I like it. #
By John Robson Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 14:40 GMT
It's 17th June ... #
By Jez Caudle Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 14:46 GMT
It is a joke because #
By Jez Caudle Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 14:47 GMT
@John Robson #
By Steve Evans Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 14:57 GMT
What about the other bits #
By Horridbloke Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 14:58 GMT
Paperweight #
By Robert Moore Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 14:59 GMT
Nice machine, nice idea but.. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:02 GMT
400Mhz #
By Rik Hemsley Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:05 GMT
I hate their website so much I want to incinerate an orphange with fiery puppies #
By Mr Fury Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:07 GMT
Logo fun #
By Marky W Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:11 GMT
Neat #
By James Pickett Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:13 GMT
hot jobbies...? #
By Chris Cooke Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:14 GMT
Pricing #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:15 GMT
Green? #
By Aaron Harris Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:16 GMT
Point of order Mr Editor #
By Fluffykins Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:20 GMT
"Mac OS X-addled machine." #
By Richard Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:42 GMT
Re: "Mac OS X-addled machine." #
By Ashlee Vance Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:47 GMT
Phallic logo? #
By Alastair Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 15:57 GMT
Compare this with... #
By Phil Endecott Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 16:07 GMT
No audio... #
By Peter Kay Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 16:21 GMT
Another 'Apple-Killer'... #
By Philip Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 16:31 GMT
re: re: "Mac OS X-addled machine." #
By Richard Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 18:24 GMT
re: re: "Mac OS X-addled machine." #
By Ashlee Vance Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 18:44 GMT
VGA? #
By Matt Bucknall Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 19:28 GMT
Ah, the great smell of vapourware #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 19:32 GMT
Sounds like a lot of things #
By zxcvbnm Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 20:01 GMT
@Ashleeeee #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 20:10 GMT
I might plug one of these into my TV. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 20:14 GMT
Price Comparison #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 20:59 GMT
@zxcvbnm - a little better than that. #
By solid gold suleyman Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 22:01 GMT
To compete with UMCs #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 17th June 2008 23:24 GMT
you guys see balls ... #
By Erik Aamot Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 00:06 GMT
oh, how 'cute' #
By bws Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 00:09 GMT
iTunes? #
By James Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 00:14 GMT
Re: iTunes? #
By Ashlee Vance Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 00:37 GMT
Stipped down iBook #
By Mathew White Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 02:32 GMT
Thin client - if only it had DVI #
By Craig Ringer Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 03:13 GMT
2W + monitor > laptop power #
By Charles Manning Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 03:16 GMT
PearPC #
By Shinku Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 03:17 GMT
Trademark? #
By David Haworth Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 06:16 GMT
@Nice machine, nice idea but.. #
By Ron Eve Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 06:45 GMT
Could be big... #
By Oliver Jones Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 08:16 GMT
I'd have one #
By Mick Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 08:17 GMT
"intellectual property...." = death knell #
By Richard Henderson Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 08:56 GMT
DVI++ #
By Gavin Nottage Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 09:05 GMT
Re:Re: iTunes? #
By Parax Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 09:32 GMT
thin client #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 09:39 GMT
Flexibility #
By Anon Koward Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 10:10 GMT
Not VGA nor DVI #
By Frank Bough Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 10:29 GMT
Help !! #
By Andy G Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 10:33 GMT
Web Audio #
By Jamie Kephalas Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 10:43 GMT
Firewall Device #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 10:49 GMT
lol #
By Mike Whitehurst Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 11:01 GMT
Looks like fun to tinker with... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 11:12 GMT
Power over Ethernet #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 11:13 GMT
@ Craig Ringer #
By andy Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 11:32 GMT
Where's the wifi? #
By Anne van der Bom Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 11:42 GMT
laptots?? #
By Matt Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 11:53 GMT
Soekris sounds much better #
By Bob Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 12:13 GMT
Memory Failure #
By Sven-ErikOlsson Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 13:03 GMT
@matt - Laptots #
By Steven Raith Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 14:23 GMT
Go Power! #
By storng.bare.durid Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 14:38 GMT
Fit PC #
By Christos Georgiou Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 15:22 GMT
was that a ZX81 #
By Michael Tripper Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 15:54 GMT
Why iTunes? #
By Snert Lee Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 17:52 GMT
Seeding the Blogoschmeer #
By Snert Lee Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 18:04 GMT
Fugly Box #
By Philip Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 18:17 GMT
Firewall #
By Nexox Enigma Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 18:29 GMT
Once again into the breach... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 18th June 2008 19:10 GMT
@Anonymous Codger #
By Erik Aamot Posted Thursday 19th June 2008 00:51 GMT
IT'S FOR PORN! #
By alex d Posted Thursday 19th June 2008 03:25 GMT
Exaggerated, but should be usable #
By Henry Wertz Posted Thursday 19th June 2008 04:23 GMT
Is It A Bird? Is It A Plane? No, It’s LimePC! #
By Vladimir Misev Posted Thursday 19th June 2008 08:42 GMT
sophomorics into the breach #
By Snert Lee Posted Thursday 19th June 2008 18:06 GMT
@ Snert Lee #
By storng.bare.durid Posted Friday 20th June 2008 02:21 GMT
I'll buy one... #
By Ben Burch Posted Friday 20th June 2008 17:41 GMT
Great box #
By Christian Berger Posted Sunday 22nd June 2008 09:14 GMT
Is CherryPal actually a LimePC? #
By Lodestone Posted Monday 30th June 2008 04:05 GMT