By Geraint JonesPosted Monday 4th August 2008 11:20 GMT
...a number of nVidia partners have delayed and then scrapped 790i motheboards that were meant to be flagships of nVidia's sli technology in their chipsets.
The rumours were less "thought up" by some "sad fuck"... Looks more like reasonable conjecture from the facts at hand at the time to me, with nVidia laying out a statement to calm down fears in the marketplace.
NB; And as far as their chipsets being "as strong as [they have] ever been for both AMD and Intel platforms”... Errr... did anyone mention to them anything about overheating in the 680s? Data corruption from early chipsets through to the 790i?
By Tim SpencePosted Monday 4th August 2008 11:30 GMT
I can exclusively reveal that I've just received a leaked report which states that The Register is to be sold to the Greek island of Lesvos. I can't reveal my sources, but it will all be in the news soon enough.
By Flocke KroesPosted Monday 4th August 2008 11:38 GMT
They could put a respectable CPU in one tenth of the area of one of their expensive GPU's. In the long term, they will need a CPU+GPU chip because that is the way the market is going. Just ask Intel, AMD+ATI and Via.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Monday 4th August 2008 11:42 GMT
Does it really make a difference whether they stop the chipset business or not, if the board designers don't want to use their chipsets. In that fashion the Digitimes rumor was spot on. Without customers it's just a drain on resources.
What on earth are you smoking? You want a CPU from people that couldn't get their sound,firewall,network and at one time even SATA disk support working? You know, the simple stuff? At least they could hide the flaws behind drivers (usually by switching to software mode and hoping no-one noticed the missing acceleration) - though I've not seen a properly working gfx driver for more than a year.
How they'd switch a broken CPU into software emulation would be entertaining to see ;)
There may be issues with nVidia chipset boards, but they're not unmanageable issues and the extra complexity of the boards must be expected to produce a few problems. I must say, I wouldn't ever choose an Intel board for anything but a real budget gaming rig right now, and there have been a number of successes with the nVidia chipset in the past, so even if the boards aren't quite up to scratch now there's no reason to think they'd just pack it in and go home.
By Paul HammPosted Monday 4th August 2008 17:34 GMT
The reason for the meeying seems awfully thin. It could very well be other concerns that the OEMs have. I wonder if this meeting has more to do with the current MCP GPU materials packaging failures that many laptop owners are seeing. If they used crap for the laptop chipsets it is unlikely they used anything better for the desktop chipsets.
Comments on: Nvidia denies chipset farewell
What sad f**k #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 4th August 2008 10:59 GMT
Re: What sad f*ck #
By Jon Lamb Posted Monday 4th August 2008 11:06 GMT
ARM-based stuff too. Tegra is important. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 4th August 2008 11:15 GMT
@ AC, to be fair... #
By Geraint Jones Posted Monday 4th August 2008 11:20 GMT
RE: What sad fuck #
By Tim Spence Posted Monday 4th August 2008 11:30 GMT
When are we going to see nVidia CPU's? #
By Flocke Kroes Posted Monday 4th August 2008 11:38 GMT
No customers makes a poor business #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 4th August 2008 11:42 GMT
re: When are we going to see nVidia CPU's? #
By Paul Posted Monday 4th August 2008 12:11 GMT
Not convincing #
By conan Posted Monday 4th August 2008 12:25 GMT
Why the meeting? #
By Paul Hamm Posted Monday 4th August 2008 17:34 GMT