By Tim CookPosted Friday 22nd August 2008 11:20 GMT
A very nice hardware design, rendered completely pointless - and, I'd guess, customerless - by being built around boring old WM Standard.
Fit it with WM Professional and a bigger internal screen (with or without touch) and you'd have a very capable smartphone complete with full Office suite. If they couldn't achieve that at this price/form factor, I don't know why they bothered.
By /\/\j17Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 11:28 GMT
Impressive that el Reg manage to get through 4 pages of review without noticing that it look like a knock-off of the Nokia E90 - just with a smaller, lower res. internal screen (400x240x65k colours vs 800x352x16m colours).
By Nick PalmerPosted Friday 22nd August 2008 12:18 GMT
Fair point - one wonders why you'd spend the extra on this, over, say an HTC S730, which has Office Mobile. Mind you, I thought Office Mobile was standard on WM6 devices, Standard AND Pro.
By Nick PalmerPosted Friday 22nd August 2008 22:24 GMT
Only the version supplied w/WM Standard; the version w/WM Pro lets you create new docs (indeed, I've used it for that on my Touch Dual). You can get around it in Standard, though, by copying blank docs to the device, modifying them and then saving under different names.
By Keith LangmeadPosted Monday 25th August 2008 09:02 GMT
I would think the only people who'd want this are those who want an E90 on the cheap! It looks like they've taken the basic form factor, and then removed all the good points from it.
Smaller screen and lower res as already mentioned aside, having the phone only able to open to an angle is going to be annoying for anyone wanting to use when it is in their hands rather than on a desk, and seems like they've gone back to the old communicator style! One of the best things with the E90 is being able to use it at an angle on a desk, but also to open it completely when in your hands which makes it so much easier to see the screening while typing.
This is a phone without a market. At the top end people will pay the extra for the quality of an actual E90, and at the low end, there are better, cheaper and more functional smart phones already out there which do the same things better.
Comments on: Asus M930 Windows Mobile smartphone
Shame #
By Tim Cook Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 11:20 GMT
Oh look, another Nokia E90 clone #
By /\/\j17 Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 11:28 GMT
Its a Nokia #
By AlTheITBloke Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 11:55 GMT
Hmmmm.... #
By AlTheITBloke Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 12:08 GMT
@Tim Cook #
By Nick Palmer Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 12:18 GMT
Toshiba Portege G910 is a better bet #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 12:43 GMT
Office Mobile #
By AlTheITBloke Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 12:45 GMT
Internal Screen #
By Steve Foster Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 12:49 GMT
Such a shame... #
By Paul Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 20:43 GMT
@AlTheITBloke #
By Nick Palmer Posted Friday 22nd August 2008 22:24 GMT
E90 competitor that doesn't compete #
By Keith Langmead Posted Monday 25th August 2008 09:02 GMT