By Nano nanoPosted Thursday 28th August 2008 12:39 GMT
It's a pity the old-style Grundig is no longer a player (just being a stick-on brand these days) - they would have had a robustly engineered and highly performing box.
By James BassettPosted Thursday 28th August 2008 12:43 GMT
£150 buys you a radio that;
"feels a little lightweight and on the ‘plasticky’ side"
"The carry handle also feels a little flimsy"
"The control array...also looks a little fussy"
" The aerial...also feels a little on the vulnerable side"
"Only 15 station presets are available"
"has a power consumption level - which damages the Stream's portability credentials"
"The user experience isn't an altogether a happy one"
"just feels a little more complex than it could have been"
"the text is quite block-like"
"once text starts to scroll...it becomes very difficult to read"
"reception isn't the best we have seen"
"sound quality is also a little disappointing"
"there's a lag time between turning the dial and the screen reacting"
"the price is a little on the heavy side"
So how in the name of Gates does it get a score of 75%?
Seriously, this is getting rediculous. Does a product actually have to decapitate the operator in order to score less than 60% or are you guys just worried that you won't get sent lots of free stuff if you give a product a bad score?
By Tom SmithPosted Thursday 28th August 2008 13:17 GMT
Um, my Bilk Radiostation can do all of that, it does need a mains cable though, I assume this one has batteries? It's hard to tell from the review, it's called a portable but there's no mention of batteries.
By Nano nanoPosted Thursday 28th August 2008 16:32 GMT
I believe "portable wirelesses" of an earlier generation also required a briefcase-sized set of lead-acid accumulators and cells with which to power the triode heaters and 120V anode supply ...
By Christian BergerPosted Friday 29th August 2008 05:52 GMT
We always watch with envy when we see one of your DAB recievers. They are essentially non-existent here. I slowly think it would be better to just drop DAB and move to DVB-T for radio.
Comments on: Roberts Stream 202 DAB/FM/net radio
Back to future #
By Nano nano Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 12:39 GMT
Let me get this straight #
By James Bassett Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 12:43 GMT
One of a kind? #
By Tom Smith Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 13:17 GMT
@Tom Smith #
By TeeCee Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 13:55 GMT
London calling ... #
By Nano nano Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 16:32 GMT
Buy this instead: Revo Pico Wifi #
By Rob Davis Posted Thursday 28th August 2008 18:20 GMT
Hey it's DAB! #
By Christian Berger Posted Friday 29th August 2008 05:52 GMT
Magicbox #
By Chris Parsons Posted Friday 29th August 2008 10:58 GMT