By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:06 GMT
Trademarks are held on a type of product, since no-one can confuse a piece of hardware - the SSD with CAD software there is no conflict unless Bentley have registered multiple trademarks in different categories including computer hardware.
By PetePosted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:09 GMT
RIP OFF!! The only benefit of this is the ability to run without A/C power. And 100GB is peanuts these days. I'll be impressed when they bring out the 1TB version instead.
By Simon WardPosted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:12 GMT
"You can pickup a freecom 320GB portable pocket HD, USB powered, for about 65 quid from Amazon!"
Think you can get the 500Gb versions for under a ton if you shop around, and if you're not fussed about bus-power and enclosure size then the 1Tb externals are getting cheaper too (got an Iomega drive for £99 inc.VAT)
Other than that, it's just a glorified flash-drive.
By Matt DaveyPosted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:35 GMT
IANAL, but I do remember that 'Pilot' pens managed to force Palm to drop its use of 'Palm Pilot' as a product name. Now, maybe Palm needed a better legal team, but I guess the courts have a fair degree of latitude in deciding how easily consumers are misled!
By alistair millingtonPosted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:49 GMT
Pen drive....
When it is under £100 and has over 500MB I would consider it, The upgrade in speeds, reliability and performance are easily blown away by the fact you can get pen drives dirt cheap these days.
By JimPosted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 16:30 GMT
USB 2.0? If they seriously wanted to market this as an external SSD then it should have an eSATA (or at a push Firewire) interface. Something that would give better performance than your average pen/thumb/flash drive anyway.
Its not a SSD its USB flash drive - they can't sell flash drives in USA #
By Doug LynnPosted Thursday 4th September 2008 15:13 GMT
Buffalo Technology will no longer be selling USB Flash Drives, MMC memory cards or CompactFlash ®, or any products containing those components in the United States. This decision is based upon SanDisk Corporation's multiple patent infringement proceedings against, among others, Buffalo's component suppliers of these products. Although Buffalo is confident its suppliers will ultimately be successful in rebutting SanDisk Corporation's assertions of infringement, until this issue is resolved Buffalo has decided to avoid any further litigation and refrain from supplying these products in the United States. Click here for additional information.
Hmm sounds like a mislabel, an SSD replaces a HD and has to be SATA not USB interface.
By sambob223Posted Monday 8th September 2008 06:07 GMT
As said earlier, pen,thumb Its already been done.
What I want to know Is can you remove It from the external case and use It In your desktop via a sata connection when you upgrade to a larger capacity one, so you don't end up with a bunch of these shoved In your closet doing nothing.
Comments on: Buffalo touts 'first' external SSD
two points #
By Bronek Kozicki Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 10:16 GMT
Stuff that! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 10:56 GMT
@ Trademarks #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:06 GMT
Pah! #
By Pete Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:09 GMT
Re: Stuff that! #
By Simon Ward Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:12 GMT
@AC 11:06 GMT #
By Bronek Kozicki Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:16 GMT
@Trademarks (AC 11:06 GMT) #
By Matt Davey Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:35 GMT
Savings #
By Iain Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:42 GMT
It's still just a big #
By alistair millington Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 11:49 GMT
I agree, a big pen drive #
By Jim Posted Wednesday 3rd September 2008 16:30 GMT
Its not a SSD its USB flash drive - they can't sell flash drives in USA #
By Doug Lynn Posted Thursday 4th September 2008 15:13 GMT
Been there, done that #
By sambob223 Posted Monday 8th September 2008 06:07 GMT