By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 17th September 2008 23:59 GMT
Why do the rest of us have to miss out just because of those who have an fit at some flashing lights? Just stick a label on it saying not suitable for epi sufferers.... I remember at the school disco the old strobe light, no doubt banned now.
By StephenPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 03:56 GMT
Photo-sensitive epilepsy is one of the rarest forms, something like 1 in 5000 (and that's the extreme high end of probability) *may* be triggered by this. These people probably already know to avoid video games...
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 07:20 GMT
"I remember at the school disco the old strobe light, no doubt banned now."
Best bit of the school disco, that.
Mind you, I remember the dancing competition too. In fact, one year they put the strobe on, one kid had a fit and he won the trophy: Teachers thought he was breakdancing.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 07:29 GMT
Why should those of us who do happen to suffer from it, but have enjoyed the Wipeout series (amongst others) for years, be denied the pleasure of playing new installments in the series?
You insensitive prick.
I say fair play to the developers - they should be applauded for this, and not chastised. So the game failed a photosensitivity test- big deal. It's great that they're doing something about it, and apparently being honest as to why the game was delayed.
By Gordon PryraPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:08 GMT
I think the fact that the game can actually bring on an attack would be a selling point.
Imagine "loosing it on the conrer" at high speed!
Its about time that they sort out our gene pool instead of dumming down the lives of the norms.
As a norm, I give up to much of the excitement of my life to those who would have either been raised by wolves and started their own empires or died on the hillside.
Bring back the Hillside side experiance for childrern I say, and also stop giving medical help to people who cause road crashes.
By AlexPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:26 GMT
Probably because there is a high percentage of epilepsy sufferers who do not know that suffer from it... You don't have to be born with it, and you certainly don't know you have it until it is too late (generally).
That'll be the reason why. I do sympathise, but I also know (second hand) what undiagnosed epilepsy can do to you...
By LiamPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:42 GMT
lets ban everything that might cause some distress to a tiny minority of people.
OR how about anyone with this type of problem should be aware of their condition and not make everyone else suffer?
why cant people take some responsibility for themselves rather than try to make everyone else pander to their needs. sheesh. i cite the US' blame culture as the cause behind all this. imagine if 20 years ago you would have seen an advert like:
' i was walking down the street and fell over - ive sued the council for 20 grand'
By Thomas BottrillPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:02 GMT
Isn't there usually a massive warning included in all video games that state that they may cause epileptic fits? Surely that's enough to not really worry too much about it (although, if this has been done fairly easily without compromising the game, there's really no problem in doing it)?
@AC
Clubs which use strobe lights usually have a massive warning at the front door saying that they use strobe lights. Having said that, I was still asked by someone not to use it as they were epileptic.
By IPBPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:20 GMT
So much wrong with your post...
1. You are NOT missing out on anything. The game will have been altered to ensure it does not contain flashing elements that could trigger a seizure. I am certain that you could play the game before and after the change and not notice any difference.
2. Photosensitive Epilepsy symptoms usually first appear during childhood or adolescence, with a peak at the beginning of puberty. So you could put all the stickers you like on a box, the individual playing may not know that they are susceptible to the condition.
3. If not exposed to triggers like flashing elements in games the 'epi sufferer' (what a lovely phrase...) may never have a seizure at all so it is well worth game producers taking the time to eliminate these scenes.
By gromPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:48 GMT
This isn't really any big deal - anything that is sold or broadcast that involves moving images is usually run through the Harding Test - http://www.hardingfpa.tv
If you're in a band and want your video shown on MTV then you have to stump up the £300 or so for the test or you leave yourself liable. AFAIK all video games are usually run through before release and many of them fail, it's not a big deal to fix either, just make sure that the pattern of flashing isn't too repetitive by randomising the flashes and your brain perceives them differently.
Nightclub lighting operators 'should' also know how long you are allowed to run a strobe without varying the speed
By Joe KPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:54 GMT
So they don't even test it, its just some "machine" that says "ooh, flashy, banned!".
Thats shit.
They really dampened down the amazing Zone mode graphics because of this, they could at least have an option so the 99.99999% of people unaffected could enjoy the eye-melting glory.
By debaserPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 11:10 GMT
yeah, f*ck 'em eh, who cares if they have a seizure and die?
No doubt you would advocate these genetically inferior epilepsy sufferers are rounded up into cattle carts and sent to a refurbished Auschwitz.
On a side note...
I don't suffer from epilepsy myself. I do however have a nut allergy (as >1% people do) and in reference to your labelling suggestion it makes me very angry that manufacturers are allowed the legal handwashing of putting 'may contain nuts' on their packaging.
You wouldn't use a label 'may contain arsenic' just to cover your arses would you. It's either got nuts in or it hasn't simple as that! How on earth is this allowed considering the precise nature of EU ingredients listing is beyond me.
By LawPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 12:07 GMT
is alot of shops for kids and adults alike, like toys r us and others will stick this game on their display units and show it in all it's HD glory - fit inducing frequencies included. Are you saying they shouldn't be shopping in the same shops as non-epileptics now too??
I'm neither epileptic or know one, but even I know that if a game can cause a fit in a passer by it should be modified if it's a relatively easy thing to do - all it takes is modifying the frequency of flashing by a few mhz, hardly something you will notice as a gamer.
I used to work in an office where I had to use an experimental imaging setup, using strobes running for hours at a time, the risk assessment decided I should blackout my office windows, and also run the strobe outside of the 10-25mhz range as that is apparently the common fit inducing frequency. Not sure if that's a 100% fact as I've never been bothered to check it myself, but I was happy to follow their recomendations as it really made no difference to me, but could mean a massive difference to co-workers.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 12:41 GMT
I can't believe I have to say this but...
This is because many foodstuffs are produced in the same factory and a trace of nuts from one item may contaminate even a foodstuff that is not intended to have any. Thus killing you. So you may or may not wish to be informed of this risk, but most people will (and the supermarket lawyers certainly don't want the liability). If you want to know if nuts are *intended* to be in there, read the ingredients which as you say will identify all substances and are extremely precise. You are a tool.
By TimMPosted Thursday 18th September 2008 22:18 GMT
"So they don't even test it, its just some "machine" that says "ooh, flashy, banned!".
Thats shit."
The "machine" is a well established and widely accepted test for epileptic triggers. Pretty accurate as I understand it. Thus they do indeed test it. No they don't need to sit someone with epilepsy in front of the game to find out.
Anyway, the few that it can affect may be unaware they are sensitive or even epileptic, and it is potentially life threatening.
Trust me, if you have seen someone suffer from a photosensitive epileptic trigger you wouldn't be such an insensitive "shit". It's a scary thing to witness and I'm sure is far worse for the sufferer.
The adjustment they have to make to the game is minor and is unlikely going to make difference to the experience. Likely if you hadn't heard about this you wouldn't even notice.
Of course if it goes ahead unaltered, you could be the one who finds out you are actually affected and never knew it, and collapse having a fit and choking on the floor with no one to help as you slowly suffocate and die. But hey, who cares so long as the majority have great fun playing it.
Comments on: Epilepsy tests delay PS3 videogame launch
Why? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 17th September 2008 23:59 GMT
Bah! #
By Chris Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 02:49 GMT
@Why? #
By kain preacher Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 03:54 GMT
Agreed, Why?! #
By Stephen Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 03:56 GMT
Aaaah.... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 07:20 GMT
@Why? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 07:29 GMT
Because people may not know #
By Steve Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 07:47 GMT
Screw the weak ones!! #
By Gordon Pryra Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:08 GMT
let's ban peanuts #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:17 GMT
@ac #
By Matt Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:24 GMT
@Why? #
By Alex Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:26 GMT
nanny state!!! #
By Liam Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:42 GMT
@Why #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 08:50 GMT
Warnings #
By Thomas Bottrill Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:02 GMT
RE: Why? #
By IPB Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:20 GMT
??? Timewarp. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:21 GMT
Harding Test #
By grom Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:48 GMT
Toss #
By Joe K Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 09:54 GMT
what's blue and doesn't fit anymore?? #
By Anony mouse Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 10:54 GMT
looking forwards to it #
By paul Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 11:00 GMT
@ AC #
By debaser Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 11:10 GMT
another reason @ why #
By Law Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 12:07 GMT
@debaser #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 12:41 GMT
@debaser #
By Mark Rendle Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 21:49 GMT
@Joe K #
By TimM Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 22:18 GMT