Reg Hardware

Comments on: Dell bundles free fresh air with PC

I would PAY not to have that crap on my machine. 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 10:16 GMT

Linux

So not having it for free (as in beer) is a bargain !

Tux, cos he's free (as in beer), too.

Follow up. 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 10:22 GMT

Happy

I look forward to the follow up article documenting the exchange of fire with Dell when he sends the 1 cent's worth of sod-all he receives back for a refund.

Good! 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 10:25 GMT

Thumb Up

Norton Internet Security is a festering pile of turd. It slows computers down and isn't even that effective at stopping nasties getting in.

Norton!=Safe 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 10:28 GMT

Paris Hilton

Surely the machine's better off without Norton anyway? (Although I'm willing to bet that it's still installed, just with the 30 day trial instead of full licence)

Paris, as she knows how to get most viruses (virii?)

Sounds good value 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 10:47 GMT

Paris Hilton

Dell are the ones who sell Ubuntu pre-installed on PCs, aren't they? Which is fairly well immune to viruses by design, as it requires the user's explicit consent to run executables rather than merely assuming that (a) everything should be executable and (b) if no program is listed as an editor / player / interpreter for that kind of file (judging by the extension) then the file itself is the program.

@Ozbon 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 11:06 GMT

Boffin

the plural of virus is in fact viruses... a simple wikipedia lookup will tell you that if you really want to know (although I can't be bothered to do so at the moment).

Something to do with the origins of the word determining the plurality I think.

Which reminds me. 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 11:37 GMT

Happy

I got an email from www.amazon.co.uk last week to say that they had overcharged me by 1p, which was being refunded.

So it's basically a case of... 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 11:49 GMT

...give us money or the computer gets it???

As of last year 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 11:56 GMT

Dell included a cheapo few month version of McAffee at no extra cost. The antispam works well enough it seems, but I'm not impressed overall. This was when I chose no antivirus.

Nod 32 all the way.

as said on the last dell sotry 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 12:47 GMT

amoung the non bugged options are

First Boot Device

Boot to Hard Drive [add £3.00]

Boot to USB [add £3.00]

Boot to Optical Device [add £3.00]

Boot to NIC [add £3.00]

Custom Partition - 50/50 Split [add £11.00]

Outlook Express Remove [£3.00]

Games Remove [£3.00]

Legacy Communications Remove (Chat, Dialer, Hyperterminal, Sound Recorder and Windows Messenger) [£3.00]

Dell Wallpaper Remove (black)

Disable Wireless Access [£3.00]

Disable Modem [£3.00]

Disable USB Ports [£3.00]

@A J Stiles 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 12:48 GMT

I remember when Macs were considered "immune" to viruses. Not any more. That's dangerous thinking, assuming anything is immune to viruses. The majority of malware exploits bugs in the software, and nothing is immune to a software developer making a mistake.

troll 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 13:19 GMT

This story is a complete troll post.

The price the troll moans about is shown for a system without norton. Of course it costs nothing EXTRA.

The 0.01 euro price he moans about is not for "fresh air", it is for a 30 day trial of McAfee.

And I don't even speak Spanish.

@Alan 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 13:28 GMT

Flame

Zero troll content, sorry. Translation of the first two options on the screenshot for you:

( ) Without antivirus protection [included in the price]

( ) Without antivirus protection - Spanish [add €0.01]

...

( ) MacAfee - 30 day trial - Spanish [add €0.01]

You're right about one thing though, "And I don't even speak Spanish."

@ A.C at 11.06 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 14:13 GMT

Ozbon

I'm with you it is definitely virii....... a simple wikipedia lookup will tell A.C what irony or humour is if he/she really wants to know (although I can't be bothered to do so at the moment).

Something to do with word play I think.

Oops there goes another rib!

I feel like I'm in good company here 

Posted Tuesday 23rd September 2008 22:13 GMT

Go

"I would PAY not to have that [anti-virus] crap on my machine."

"Norton Internet Security is a festering pile of turd. It slows computers down and isn't even that effective at stopping nasties getting in."

"Surely the machine's better off without Norton anyway?"

"I remember when Macs were considered "immune" to viruses. Not any more."

When did El Reg commentators get clues handed out to 'em? I must've missed that offer. Or is it another option you can buy from Dell for 0.01 euros?

@ A.C at 11.06 

Posted Wednesday 24th September 2008 02:57 GMT

> I'm with you it is definitely virii

well I dont know what it is but if you follow singular and plural rules then it should be

viri

for example

cactus -> cacti and not cactii

Broken link 

Posted Wednesday 24th September 2008 13:17 GMT

Unhappy

your link to a 'really big box' is broken :(

virii's 

Posted Wednesday 24th September 2008 14:39 GMT

Paris Hilton

If we keep on using virii eventually the OED will admit defeat and include it in the dictionary. Then we will have won and you can no longer cite 'neuter nouns' and greek non plurals and masculine forms and all that crap bwaa ha haa.

I am l33t give me warez. Mouses of the world unite and kill all da Catz

I wonder where my tongue is. Oh! here it is firmly stuck in cheek!!

Virii 

Posted Wednesday 24th September 2008 21:50 GMT

Stop

There is no Latin plural for 'virus'(therefore, using native English pluralization(ie 'viruses') is correct). In Latin, the word means "poison", which is uncountable(and therefore unpluralizable). 'Viri' is the plural form of the Latin for "man"(vir), while 'virii' is a complete misunderstanding of Latin.