Reg Hardware

Comments on: Super Talent delivers SSDs for poor people

Superior battery life? 

Posted Tuesday 30th September 2008 23:15 GMT

Stop

*cough* http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hdd-battery,1955.html *cough*

Oliver.

superior size? 

Posted Tuesday 30th September 2008 23:26 GMT

> Strike one benefit of using SSDs, but it still leaves superior size, durability, and battery life

OK, can someone please explain to me how a 2.5 inch SSD has "superior size" to a 2.5 inch SATA drive?

Longer lasting? 

Posted Wednesday 1st October 2008 02:27 GMT

They wear out :)

Read / Write cycles.

@Oliver 

Posted Wednesday 1st October 2008 06:19 GMT

The Tom's Hardware article makes very interesting reading. But even more interesting is the followup article referenced at the bottom of the first page.

Seems that there is good reason to think that the first generation SSDs are pretty poor - and only useful for higher performance, and have in general worse power performance, but that this is a result of the use of the first gen support chips, and not inherent to flash. The OCZ flash drive tested in the followup totally wipes the field, close to the top performance, and vastly better power, beating all the other flash and rotating media drives comprehensively. So it seems reasonable to suspect that the second generation of SSDs will make good on the promise. But no doubt, purchasing any of the first gen SSDs would be an unhappy experience.

@Oliver 

Posted Wednesday 1st October 2008 08:24 GMT

Ok, quieter then!

But so is a brick.

as Oliver said... 

Posted Wednesday 1st October 2008 08:34 GMT

Boffin

That is all...

seek speed...... 

Posted Wednesday 1st October 2008 08:48 GMT

Stop

Umm you may want to partially un-strike the speed benefit. Seek speeds are where SSD's actually have their real speed benefit over traditional HDD's. No head to move so much lower data access latency perfect for lots of small files.

question about data traces 

Posted Wednesday 1st October 2008 20:27 GMT

IT Angle

I'm worried about the wear-levelling features that I've heard are now embedded at the flash controller level out of your normal reach. Does that mean that traces of data on a region of flash that has been remapped to spread out the write cycles will remain and be somehow available for forensic examination? Or do the controllers zero out flash after it has been copied and remapped?

longevity... 

Posted Friday 3rd October 2008 11:18 GMT

Thumb Up

the flash drives may wear... but I welcome loosing 10%of a drive thats only 20%full over a total catastrophic failure...

and with the number of 2.5" drives that I have had expire on me due to mecanical breakage it is something i cant wait for :)

the past few months I have been using an 8gb class 6 SDHC (much more basic tech) card in my eeeeepc for main storage and havent noticed any issues, and that card had spent a year in a digital camera before that, some time spent in the central american rainforest then bashed about in the atlantic during a yacht race and it is still going strong!!!

I for one wait for our SSD bearing overlords with open arms! :)