My laptop has been doing this for years, when I press the screen switch (from int to ext) an image is still displayed on the LCD, albeit very faint and only visible from certain angles. It's not just burn either, the image does change as it should but according to the instructions and diagnostic no power is flowing to the screen! Magic!
(Note: I obviously do not believe the diagnostic tools supplied with the laptop and am fully aware that this is not "spiderwebs and magic")
Since the technology isn't specified it is hard to say whether it is a real step forward, but retaining an image on a LCD panel is nothing new. Thorn EMI's Central Research Laboratories developed a colour Ferro electric LCD (FLCD) in the early 1990s (1992?) that would do exactly that. FLCD panels will retain the image indefinitely without power being applied (although power is still required for the backlight to view the image).
In all seriousness, even if it could retain the LCD image without power, that large power consumption is actually going towards the CCFL backlight - has anybody ever seen a fully functional screen but with a broken or otherwise 'off' CCFL? You get nothing useful.
Furthermore the argument for LCD eInk is pointless, the point of current eInk tech is that it doesn't emit any light. You know, kind of like how your common or garden book works! LCDs on the other hand...
...that is unless you're talking about the same kind of LCD screens you get today in some alarm clocks, watches, or those cool 1980s monochrome LCD videogames, which have always had really dull contrast.
I remember seeing this exact kind of thing on Tomorrows World (given thats been off the air for donkeys years...), it was a special with Prince Charles, same episode had 1 way posters for shop windows (so shoppers could see out of the shop & let in light, but looking inwards it looked like a normal poster).
... to enlighten the likes of Stu as well, FLCDs are used in certain niche markets, and draw no current with a static image. The smectic FLC is used in most of the microdisplays, and can switch state faster than the usual nematic LCs used in TFTs. I haven't had a chance to check the tech being shown off by Sharp, but it could be they have overcome the thin-film requirements for smectic FLCs (which is why they aren't used in TFTs).
By VincePosted Saturday 1st November 2008 14:11 GMT
"has anybody ever seen a fully functional screen but with a broken or otherwise 'off' CCFL?"
No, I've never seen anything "FULLY FUNCTIONAL" that has any part of it not work. I'm pretty sure that means it isn't fully functional.
Anyhow, if someone could invent better backlight technology and do away with it *properly* without any negative side effects, and improve black depth that's be great. I'm not sure I need the image once the screen is off.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Saturday 1st November 2008 14:25 GMT
So, the panel requires a burst of energy to "save" the image but no more thereafter to preserve it. Methinks a capacitor is being charged somewhere and is being used to power a relatively classic LCD albeit maybe with reduced power consumption.
By DavePosted Saturday 1st November 2008 22:15 GMT
I'm sure in the past I've seen LCD tech that has the option to not use a backlight, but instead open the back of the panel to sunlight and use that instead
I think I also remember a system before the advent of cheap projectors that let you detach the lid of the laptop, remove the back of the panel and sit it on an old fashioned OHP and project onto a screen that way.
Maybe someone should bring back the screen-with-no-back idea and sell it as environmentally friendly... the greenies would love it, sales would surge on a tide of green nonsense
Comments on: Sharp shows image-retaining LCD
Been there #
By Iain Posted Friday 31st October 2008 09:39 GMT
Nothing new #
By Peter Posted Friday 31st October 2008 10:45 GMT
So ... #
By Stu Posted Friday 31st October 2008 11:15 GMT
As the other posters have said #
By DPWDC Posted Friday 31st October 2008 11:27 GMT
So let me get this right... #
By Loki Posted Friday 31st October 2008 11:54 GMT
Eh? #
By Anonymous John Posted Friday 31st October 2008 12:23 GMT
Tomorrows World #
By Peter Posted Friday 31st October 2008 12:30 GMT
@Peter: FLC wasn't a CRL invention, but... #
By Pinky Posted Friday 31st October 2008 13:43 GMT
@Iain #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 1st November 2008 02:51 GMT
Fully disfunctional.... #
By Vince Posted Saturday 1st November 2008 14:11 GMT
Capacitors? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 1st November 2008 14:25 GMT
Who needs a backlight? #
By Dave Posted Saturday 1st November 2008 22:15 GMT
@Dave #
By Rob Posted Sunday 2nd November 2008 15:10 GMT