By StuartPosted Tuesday 18th November 2008 12:27 GMT
So Quad Cores using "no more than 65w" are "energy efficient" and Intel are happy to push the market to 135w processors.
People were amazed at the original Pentium prolific 60w consumption. Seems a bit strange to re-label prolific as energy efficient. Looks like we ought to get CO2 emisions on the label and charge penal taxes on the leccy-guzzlers.
Mines the one with an (eeepc 901) Atom in the pocket.
By GordonPosted Tuesday 18th November 2008 16:14 GMT
May I refer Stuart to BOFH Episode 4...
[quote]
"A REAL computer has ONE speed and the only powersaving it permits is when you pull the power leads out of the back!" I blurt. "In fact, a REAL computer would have a hole in the front to push trees into and an exhaust pipe out the back for the black smoke to come out of."
Comments on: Intel Core i7 'Nehalem' CPUs go on sale
Memory speeds #
By Shaun Posted Tuesday 18th November 2008 11:45 GMT
All Hot & Bothered #
By Stuart Posted Tuesday 18th November 2008 12:27 GMT
Carbon neutrality? #
By Gordon Posted Tuesday 18th November 2008 16:14 GMT
Nehalem #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 19th November 2008 15:39 GMT