By Paul StephensonPosted Tuesday 25th November 2008 12:17 GMT
Ah but in this time of the credit crunch, the important question has to be, how much of a hole will it leave in my wallet? At 256GB that's surely in the realms of a remortgage?
By Scott L. BursonPosted Wednesday 26th November 2008 07:28 GMT
Yes, AC, it's sequential I/O (particularly writing) that SSDs are usually not good at. With zero latency, they do random I/O at the same speed as sequential -- much faster than discs do.
By Richard HomePosted Wednesday 26th November 2008 09:27 GMT
SSDs have huge problems with lots small random writes as each requires rewriting of a very large sector. It's so bad that many reviewers don't recommend first generation SSDs purely because of this. There's lots written elsewhere on the net on this subject.
By Bronek KozickiPosted Wednesday 26th November 2008 10:55 GMT
This is what gave Intel SSDs marketing impact - they managed to squeeze really good random writes from MLC silicon. But SLC write performance is quite decent by nature - is this Samsung drive MLC or SLC?
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 5th December 2008 13:24 GMT
..add a small loudspeaker to produce that turbine like spinup whine of a 15K hdd to a ssd? half the fun of having enterprise class kit in a workstation is having it sound like it means business on power on!
Comments on: Samsung pitches '15,000rpm HDD speed' SSD
Cost? #
By Paul Stephenson Posted Tuesday 25th November 2008 12:17 GMT
Reg year end parties taking effect #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 25th November 2008 20:32 GMT
El Reg has it backwards #
By Scott L. Burson Posted Wednesday 26th November 2008 07:28 GMT
No - they're still sober #
By Richard Home Posted Wednesday 26th November 2008 09:27 GMT
yup, random writes are a problem #
By Bronek Kozicki Posted Wednesday 26th November 2008 10:55 GMT
rekon its possible to... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 5th December 2008 13:24 GMT