By James PickettPosted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 14:36 GMT
But is the sound as good as the Aego M system at nearly half the price? I bet it isn't, Mark Levinson or no Mark Levinson. Also, neither having nor desiring an iPod, I find the 'dock' a positive discouragement, as must everyone else with other types of MP3 player...
By neteanPosted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 15:58 GMT
This is something I simply cannot undrestand, the ipod being arguably top of the line in terms of portable audio players (at least in terms of market share and public perception), but playing and charging are virtually impossible as the interference for the charging is attrocious.
The ipod has gone through what, 6/7 updates and it's still a huge problem.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 20:32 GMT
I suppose you'll be wanting some huile du serpent to go with those rare earth cables with the oxidised platinum connectors and gold-plated aura-enhancing vibe-filters
By Michael WrightPosted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 22:12 GMT
"Some of the flatness and sluggish response that can be a feature of iPod playback is gone, and ultimately there is more bounce and a more natural feeling to the sound."
Does this mean anything? In particular, what is "sluggish response"? The review also talks about the unit's response to complex rhythms. What features, exactly, are involved hear? The audiophile-grade toe-tap quantum nucleizer?
Paris, because she seems to *like* a load of bollocks.
By martinXPosted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 23:16 GMT
I took one of these for a spin and hated the control on the front. It's supposed to be touch-sensitive but its sensitivity left a lot to be desired. When I want to turn the volume up, don't make me try and figure out exactly how I'm supposed to place my finger in order to get the system to respond. Pity, because otherwise it was an OK system. I ended up getting a Panasonic.
By Scott MckenziePosted Thursday 4th December 2008 11:10 GMT
Guys if you don't understand, just accept, or go away and read.... people rant and rave about crap reviews on here and when someone actually posts information that is meaningful (i.e. sluggish response, bounce, natural etc...) they get slapped down!
Speaker cables do make a difference, accept it.
As for an Aego M comparison - a bit harsh.... whilst i agree the Aego M is absolutely stunning, a) it's not half the price and b) it's only a set of speakers, there is no DAB radio, no iPod dock etc... handy if you don't need them but not exactly an apples with apples comparison!!!
Comments on: LG FA163DAB 160W iDock micro hi-fi system
Comparison #
By James Pickett Posted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 14:36 GMT
don't charge to improve sound #
By netean Posted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 15:58 GMT
Does The Remote Allow Scrolling? #
By Alacrity Fitzhugh Posted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 16:04 GMT
The second midrange woofer #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 18:47 GMT
"cheap cables"? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 20:32 GMT
"Sluggish" iPods?? #
By Michael Wright Posted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 22:12 GMT
Scroll wheel on unit. #
By martinX Posted Wednesday 3rd December 2008 23:16 GMT
Hmm.. #
By Scott Mckenzie Posted Thursday 4th December 2008 11:10 GMT