By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 11th December 2008 18:47 GMT
all they did was match a stored image with a neural image.
it wasn't an image if what the person was thinking, just the previously associated image.
if for example the subject was shown a picture of jacqui smith and they were thinking about paris hilton at the time th scan was taken, then the next time the subject thought of paris up would pop jacqui's image
By Hywel ThomasPosted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:08 GMT
Paranoid partner records partner's brain activity, where they dream of shagging partners brother/sister/mother/father/best friend/woman from the checkout at Tescos/Nigella/Nigel/Angelina/Brad etc.
Either get woken up violently, or get some serious evils over breakfast, eventually leading to all out war and divorce.
By adnimPosted Thursday 11th December 2008 20:56 GMT
Well if I was to delve into and see the thought processes of the average Londoner or any UK facebook dwelling, iPhone/iPod owning, Eastender/X factor/reality TV watching, girl/boy band appreciating, Daily Mail reading, form over function citizen..
Then "London's burning with boredom now" comes to mind.
Scary tech yes, I fear for my son and his potential/future children, I am a middle aged bloke. I will be dead before this technology is fully mastered, whence a "minority report" reality with adverts directly beamed into one's minds eye will be the new utopia/dystopia. The time of human individuality and freedom will truly be over.
By DavePosted Thursday 11th December 2008 21:12 GMT
Good Use: Letting the immobile or disabled communicate easily (Think Stephen Hawking, and what he could do with this)
Aversion therapy. Giving up smoking? Think Cigarette, See Jacqui Spliff naked on a trampoline
Bad use:Pretty much everything else involving the government
Though I'd like to thank AC above for giving me the thought about transcranial Magnetic stimulation. Combine that with pr0n of your choice and you never need leave the house again
By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 11th December 2008 21:29 GMT
This can only lead to one of two things: the SQUID memory units from the film Strange Days (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114558/) or buying your holiday memories of Mars, as Ahnuld did in Total Recall (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100802/).
By Dive FoxPosted Thursday 11th December 2008 21:33 GMT
The only interesting dreams will be the ones with the last human, a being evolved from his cat, and a hologram of one of his dead crewmates performing a song-and-dance number.
Obviously early days but it is a step in the direction of direct brain/computer interface. I want a direct brain/computer interface.
As for the nay-sayers, I do get the point, but we could say the same things about other technologies: knives, nuclear fission techniques, and so on. We figured out how to use them mostly responsibly.
By KanhefPosted Friday 12th December 2008 01:19 GMT
This could just be associating patterns of neural activity with known shapes. To really be 'brain reading', there are two more tests they need to pass. First, they need to be able to correctly predict what neural activity a new shape/letter will produce. Second, when test subjects are shown an image *unknown to the researchers*, their scanner needs to accurately reproduce it.
By Andy BrightPosted Friday 12th December 2008 01:31 GMT
Are you sure they didn't just throw up images of random naked women and find to their amazement that this was precisely what their male test subjects were thinking about?
By Flocke KroesPosted Friday 12th December 2008 06:40 GMT
From the vague article, this is my guess at what the experiment was like, but modified for use on Register readers:
First wire up a Register reader. Have a computer show them the following pictures repeatedly in a random order: The Register logo, Tux, Apple's logo, Microsoft's Logo, an Intel Inside sticker and the Paris thumbnail. Wait until each image gives a consistent response. Get a second computer to display a guess of the image that the first computer is showing from the name of the Register reader and the electrode output.
The next step is to vague up a description of the experiment until journalists will misinterpret it as reading images from inside brains. Use the resulting confusion to get investment from Jacqui Smith and all the other confused thought-police wannabes.
For those of you who do not read Japanese, this will give you a clue about where I am coming from. The longest word for neuron that I found was shinkeisaibou, which is written 神経細胞 (if you have a kanji font installed). Each of the four letters has several meanings, and each letter is made of meaningful components.
神 shin: gods; mind; soul. Left component: salute; bow; ceremony; thanks; remuneration. Right component: have the honor to; sign of the monkey; 3-5PM; ninth sign of Chinese zodiac.
経 kei: sutra; longitude; pass thru; expire; warp. Left component: thread. Top right: or; again; furthermore; on the other hand. Bottom right: soil; earth; ground; Turkey.
細 sai: dainty; get thin; taper; slender; narrow. Left component: thread. Right component: rice field.
胞 hou: placenta; sac; sheath. Left component: moon. Right component:wrap; pack up; cover; conceal.
These letters are going to cause different responses all over the brain unrelated to the shape of the letter just like the logos will cause a conditioned response in a prejudiced fanboy/Register reader.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 12th December 2008 08:22 GMT
That the NSBLP (National Socialist British Labour Party) will be out of power by the time this becomes viable. (Assuming GB doesn't make himself "Prime Feurer for life).
By Oliver MayesPosted Friday 12th December 2008 09:01 GMT
but generally I find my thoughts tend to be very hard to represent as just an image, they're generally more a mismash of, well, thoughts. I doubt any technology, no matter how advanced, could ever capture what I was thinking. Even if it could, it would be almost impossible to present the captured information in any meaningful way. Maybe reconstructing the image my eyes are seeing, but nothing more than that.
By ParaxPosted Friday 12th December 2008 10:12 GMT
Captured from the visual cortex sounds as if it was recording live sight, rather than a vivid imagination. This has far more use both for recording vision (The Plods get thier own Black box without a headcam..) and also for artificial eyes feeding the cortex data...
By Marvin the MartianPosted Friday 12th December 2008 10:34 GMT
Obviously when I think about food, I see the letters spelled out one by one. F-O-O-D, B-E-E-R, M-M-H-M. Sometimes I see them in Times, sometimes Helvetica but never (god forbid) in Comic Sans. If it's scarily bad in it's in gothic letters.
You also have the rorschach-test guy who sees beautiful women in every given picture, as that's what he always thinks about.
...
What I'm trying to point out is, you will indeed be able probably to show the intensity of a few thousand parameters at any single time, but there is no 1-to-1 mapping to what it means.
If they followed the last 50years of genetic research vaguely, they'd know that with DNA you have the same mapping problem (as understood for about 20 years, right about when Dawkins started lying and claiming the opposite).
By Eddie EdwardsPosted Friday 12th December 2008 10:38 GMT
This is a stupid experiment for those that believe our visual experience comes down to us having a "TV in our head" which our souls watch.
Nice theory, unfortunately disproven by every optical illusion there is.
Did they discern what the subject THOUGHT or what they SAW? #
By Dr Patrick J R HarkinPosted Friday 12th December 2008 10:55 GMT
The optical cortex is on the surface atthe back of the brain and functional MRI scans have been able to distinguish whether the subject is being shown a vertical or horizontal line for a few years now. This sounds similar, rather than a true "thought reading" process.
By GarethPosted Friday 12th December 2008 11:36 GMT
Take person x's brain wave pattern when looking and thinking of the letter N.
Basically if a = b within reasonable parameters display the image n back to person x.
However, if we then take person y and get them to think of the letter N when viewing then same image, person y's brain wave pattern a = b? I seriously doubt it!
Less as useful and reliable than speech recognition.
Hmm lets just sit here and train the computer to recognise ure brain wave patterns for everything you think of!
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 12th December 2008 12:31 GMT
This was in an old G.I. Joe comic, but it's application in the comic made more sense if certain time constraints held.
The problem with this, is that the pattern the brain produces for a particular item will change over time. Asking someone to think of a car and then comparing that to the same image down the road will result in different images.
By The Fuzzy WotnotPosted Friday 12th December 2008 12:54 GMT
What do all the blokes say when the missus/GF says "What are you thinking about?", we all say...."Oh nothing." You know what? 99.9% of the time that's true! Sorry ladies, the most intelligent we normally get is wondering how that top heavy lady we saw on the bus this morning, manages to sleep face down?
By Luther BlissettPosted Friday 12th December 2008 13:42 GMT
I recall seeing a TV program, it must have been at least 20 years ago, in which electrodes inserted into a cat's brain were shown being triggered by straight lines in the cat's visual field. I've never forgotten that cat - it was sitting up, staring blankly ahead at a whiteboard, motionless, unblinking, (unyawning), like an Egptian mummy guardian wotsit. The neuroscience was par for the course, but the cat's catatonia was truly awesome.
I don't think the spooks will be investing in the neuroscience any time soon.
they've been able to read thoughts for a while, i recall seeing a TV program where thought was used to control a robotic arm (badly admittedly) years ago
while the use in the article is slightly different, the general principle is the same but this is actually a much better use of the technology, to assist paralysed people/artificial libs/etc
and once we've dealt with all the cripples we can then turn our attention to the really important part - controlling a computer through thought, think how quickly you could type if you didn't have to move your fingers and press keys! and the increased working speed might mean it stops being considered acceptable for so-called programmers to release the sort of bloatware crap that most software is these days
Comments on: World's first 'thought images' seen on screen
A Reg Headline 10 Years From Now.... #
By Ed Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 18:38 GMT
nope sorry total junk #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 18:47 GMT
Scary or Good? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:02 GMT
I'm sure it'll be misused by the advertisers #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:06 GMT
Great for paranoid partners #
By Hywel Thomas Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:08 GMT
Monsters from the id (Forbidden Planet) #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:16 GMT
More like #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:27 GMT
Oh Crap... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:37 GMT
oops #
By Mike Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:47 GMT
"Who are the brain police?" #
By Gary B Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 19:58 GMT
Android? #
By Rik Hemsley Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 20:18 GMT
Taking apart Humpty Dumpty #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 20:27 GMT
@more like-AC #
By adnim Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 20:56 GMT
Good use / Bad use #
By Dave Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 21:12 GMT
We Can Remember It For You Wholesale #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 21:29 GMT
Pft #
By Dive Fox Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 21:33 GMT
Cool. #
By E Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 22:26 GMT
Whoa! Talk about 20 minutes into the future! #
By J.R. Bloodsworth Posted Thursday 11th December 2008 23:49 GMT
Needs more testing #
By Kanhef Posted Friday 12th December 2008 01:19 GMT
Uhuh #
By Andy Bright Posted Friday 12th December 2008 01:31 GMT
Smell the money #
By Flocke Kroes Posted Friday 12th December 2008 06:40 GMT
Let's hope.. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 12th December 2008 08:22 GMT
Dream Police #
By CTG Posted Friday 12th December 2008 08:25 GMT
So... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 12th December 2008 08:34 GMT
Tinfoil hat? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 12th December 2008 08:41 GMT
Re:I'm sure it'll be misused by the advertisers #
By Andy Worth Posted Friday 12th December 2008 09:00 GMT
Maybe it's just me, #
By Oliver Mayes Posted Friday 12th December 2008 09:01 GMT
need a photographic memory? #
By Tom Posted Friday 12th December 2008 09:13 GMT
I for one #
By Paul McConkey Posted Friday 12th December 2008 09:20 GMT
Imagined image or seen image? #
By Parax Posted Friday 12th December 2008 10:12 GMT
@AC 11/12 19.27 #
By Jon Whiteoak Posted Friday 12th December 2008 10:22 GMT
What complete bollocks #
By Marvin the Martian Posted Friday 12th December 2008 10:34 GMT
Stupid #
By Eddie Edwards Posted Friday 12th December 2008 10:38 GMT
Did they discern what the subject THOUGHT or what they SAW? #
By Dr Patrick J R Harkin Posted Friday 12th December 2008 10:55 GMT
Entirely Subjective #
By Gareth Posted Friday 12th December 2008 11:36 GMT
G.I.Joe #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 12th December 2008 12:31 GMT
Come one you know the answer! #
By The Fuzzy Wotnot Posted Friday 12th December 2008 12:54 GMT
Roll on #
By ShaggyDoggy Posted Friday 12th December 2008 12:56 GMT
What took them so long? #
By Luther Blissett Posted Friday 12th December 2008 13:42 GMT
old news... #
By Mike Posted Friday 12th December 2008 21:11 GMT