By Chris GibsonPosted Monday 22nd December 2008 13:31 GMT
Cue fifty posts along the lines of "The MacBook Air is crap because it doesn't meet my needs / I can't afford it / I hate Apple" and so on.
Case in point above: "It might break if you look at it the wrong way! LOL!", writes Mike Giggler. It's actually an extremely solid laptop -- I think that one of the most impressive things about the MBA is that although it's very thin, it doesn't feel flimsy at all.
Just my opinion, though. If you want a laptop with a load of ports, of if you need a really powerful machine, or if you're looking to spend less than a grand, or if you just think there are better alternatives, don't buy a MacBook Air. Seems pretty simple to me.
By Tony Smith, Editor, Reg HardwarePosted Monday 22nd December 2008 13:34 GMT
I haven't sat on my Air, but I have dropped it. It hit the lower left corner of the screen, which is now (vaguely - you have to look close to see it) dented. No damage was done to the screen.
I can't think of many (any?) plastic cased laptops that are as resilient.
By FaraiPosted Monday 22nd December 2008 13:44 GMT
There are very few laptops you CAN sit on and get away with it - you even have to pick and choose amongst the ToughBooks to get away with such foolery.
I do wish people would come up with genuine reasons not to like something; objective reasons that show your comment is well thought out.
You want Satellite Pro - go get one. I like, and use OSX - and these are the machines that run it. I bet you don't go flaming Nokia for not licensing their S40 mobile platform to other phone makers. You buy the phone out there that most closely matches your needs, wants and wallet.
And yet Apple doing it's own thing in that same vein doesn't seem fair - WHY?!?
Mine's the one with made by Freedom of Choice (TM)
just to add - i was having a go with a friends MBA and when they weren't looking, i did try and flex it a little, to see how fragile it felt, and it didn't really feel like it was in any danger of snapping. i doubt it'd prove to be any more likely to break than any other laptop
£1700? No adaptors, no optical drive, non-swappable battery, non-upgradeable RAM, 1 USB port, no chuffin' RJ45 (I mean, come on!) and it's £1700? Are you mad?? Why in God's name would someone buy one of these things unless they wanted to be a complete poser? Yes it looks good (though it'd look better in black), but I'd rather have something I could actually use.
If you want to be a bit of a poser, go right ahead. Me, I'll stick with my current laptop - a surprisingly well built £420 chunk o' hunk with a faster processor, more kit, and it even comes with a spare £1300 to spend on having a good time....
one of the reasons I bought an 'air is because it's tough. With the SSD, I stick it in a neoprene bag, and throw it in the top-box on my motorcycle. I've had it almost a year now, and it's not missed a beat. I've been touring with it, and it's ideal.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Monday 22nd December 2008 19:51 GMT
Adding one additional USB port and an RJ-45 port would be enough for me to find it interesting. And it certainly wouldn't take much extra space. Not having them though, is all it takes for me to not be interested. There's no way I want to do installs of software over WiFi networking, and to use Apple's USB WiFi adapter means you can't have any other USB device hooked up at the same time.
By P. LeePosted Monday 22nd December 2008 23:57 GMT
Apple has a unique ability to make you want its products. I love my (freebie) ipod, even though I don't really listen to music that much. Apple's products just make you want to touch them.
Oh yes, and the multi-touch trackpad. Its absolutely essential to make a laptop usable. Once you've used one you'll never want anything else with a laptop.
The Air may be low on features, but it does more than enough for its target market.
I'm a linux fan (windows is just for games) but if I ever have to buy a laptop, it will be a mac of some sort. As can be seen by talking to most Apple owners, those who buy rarely regret it.
By David AustinPosted Tuesday 23rd December 2008 05:17 GMT
v1 looked nice, and v2 seems to have solved the weedy performance. The only thing I really don't get is why only 1 USB Port? Sure, you can use a hub, but If you're ditching every conceivable port known to man, at least throw a few USB Ports on, especially if there's no built in Ethernet.
Come on, Ive and co - You seriously can't squeeze another USB Port and a Network port on the thing, after all the work you've done on JesusPhone and iPod nano?
By Christian BergerPosted Tuesday 23rd December 2008 08:58 GMT
I mean what's the point of running benchmarks. You won't really notice any change below 1:2.
What's more important is how durable it is. And Apple has had _lots_ of problems back then. Apple is, unfortunately, absolutely uncreative when it comes to securing the reliability of their devices. Drop it from a meter a few times and see if it still works.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 24th December 2008 11:31 GMT
The MacBook Air is not MEANT to be a powerhouse for geeks, it's targetted at people who want reasonable performance in a very compact form. Apple have *deliberately* stripped out a lot of the unnecessary stuff (unnecessary for its target market, not geeks) to make it so unbelievably thin and portable.
The whining I keep hearing from people moaning about how expensive it is given it's been stripped down. Sorry guys, but stripping all this stuff off a standard laptop form factor takes R&D time, it's the same reason Porsche make versions of it's cars which have everything stripped out (glass for perspex, removal of seats, no air-con etc, right down to the badge being a sticker rather than a metal badge) and cost MORE than the standard versions with all the trimmings. It's a niche market that they're catering for and the design costs time and therefore money.
If you have about £1200 to spare and want an Apple laptop, you have 2 choices - buy a full-featured MacBook Pro if you're a geek and/or want the power and features the larger form-factor provides, or buy a MacBook Air and get the ultimate in portability with some features and performance sacrificed in order to achieve that.
Remember geeks - the MacBook Air is not targetted at you! Go buy the MacBook Pro instead.
By Jason GrantPosted Friday 26th December 2008 21:53 GMT
Do people continue to criticize at product that would never fit their needs or in fact is not even targeted at them as a potential customer.
I have seen the MBA and absolutely love the form factor and design, however like others here I would never buy one, why not, because it wouldn't do what I needed, however why should that stop me liking the product for what it is or admiring the design aesthetics. I think it's great that innovation like this continues as eventually it will filter down into the sort of devices I need and use.
It's a real shame people insist on this type of behavior - it is not constructive or enjoyable (and I usually enjoy reading the news and views on El Reg).
Please, Please accept products like the MBA and iPhone for what they are, and if you are not the intended audience then don't feel you have to try and ruin the experience for those who are. I am not an Apple Fanboy - I use products from many manufacturers (including Apple) and don't feel the need to call something a pile of cr@p just because it doesn't meet my needs!
By skeptical iPosted Saturday 27th December 2008 19:34 GMT
While I look askance at Air having only one USB port (??) and a non- replaceable battery (???), I also agree with the many posters who basically said that if it won't work for you as-is, don't buy it. I wouldn't buy a Maserati to haul sacks of concrete any more than I'd buy a pickup truck to race on the autobahn. Kudos to Apple for pushing the design envelope; in due time I expect we'll see something with all the features that powergeeks need built into something stylish enough to make us look forward to doing work on it.
Comments on: MacBook Air Late 2008
Oops! I sat on it! #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 12:52 GMT
...thin, but... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 13:25 GMT
Here we go... #
By Chris Gibson Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 13:31 GMT
@AC #
By Tony Smith, Editor, Reg Hardware Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 13:34 GMT
@Anonymous Coward ; Oops! I sat on it! #
By Farai Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 13:44 GMT
thin? yes - fragile? no #
By jai Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 14:18 GMT
So...it's still a piece of crap? #
By Greg Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 15:32 GMT
tough #
By fifi Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 15:41 GMT
Overpriced and short on features... #
By Franklin Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 16:38 GMT
One step short of greatness... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 19:51 GMT
doh #
By Ty Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 20:03 GMT
re: Overpriced and short on features... #
By P. Lee Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 23:57 GMT
title #
By David Austin Posted Tuesday 23rd December 2008 05:17 GMT
Can't you ever test important things? #
By Christian Berger Posted Tuesday 23rd December 2008 08:58 GMT
As A Matter Of Fact.... #
By stephen dean Posted Tuesday 23rd December 2008 23:36 GMT
Sigh... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 24th December 2008 11:31 GMT
Why oh Why #
By Jason Grant Posted Friday 26th December 2008 21:53 GMT
Free PC's #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Saturday 27th December 2008 07:29 GMT
Right tool for the job? #
By skeptical i Posted Saturday 27th December 2008 19:34 GMT
since when #
By hj Posted Monday 5th January 2009 14:00 GMT