By GulfiePosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:30 GMT
Clearly, this toy has extraterrestrial origins. Roswell perhaps. But then again, with the Roswell ailens abilities to keep things flying, perhaps not... time to use the old standby I guess...
By TeeCeePosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:34 GMT
No question about it.
The guts of this beast are quite obviously a rehash of Mattel's Harry Potter levitating challenge game. My kids used to have one. Ok, it's now in white and pastel colours rather than brown (pseudo wood), black and other such less tech-friendly shades, but it's the same thing.
If you don't believe me, link: http://www.toymania.com/columns/spotlight/hplevgame.shtml
I reckon that you wind the knob on the front to move the fan around the circuit. The ball stays in the airstream courtesy of Bernoulli. The headset does something to control the altitude of the ball (fan speed). The Potter thing used to come with a handle to control fan power that also made the Potter figure in the middle wave his wand up and down.
Conclusion: Mattel seeking to get some extra cash out of a long obsolete product by rehashing it to appeal to a new audience.
By Andrew KatzPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 14:22 GMT
I'd start by having an elasticated headband with a few straingauges (or even just switches) embedded in it, so it could detect movements of the facial muscles. I'm sure that would be a hell of a lot cheaper to manufacture, more reliable, and give the user a better illusion of mind control, than anything which purported to detect actual brainwaves.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 14:47 GMT
It doesn't matter how it works. It won't be appreciated by the kids, who will, of course, find more fun in either the cardboard box, or rolling the ball around on the floor until it rolls under the sofa, when it's "Dad, can you get the ball for me...."
Now, mind control over the kids - I'd buy THAT for a dollar!
By Bad MaxPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 17:17 GMT
Or use accelerometers (probably what Mattel did). All that straining to produce "brain waves" is certain to be accompanied by involuntary tossing of the head. And all but the living dead / even the living dead could learn to play it...
By PeytonPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 17:43 GMT
Psh - as if! To achieve the levitation, Mattel has obviously modified a Vulcan psionic amplifier. Parents had better hope their kids are full of only good intentions...
(oh man - I can't believe I just wrote that lol. In my defense, I was a TNG fan *as a kid* - I'm not the comic book guy from The Simpsons - I swear! 8)
By Andy BrightPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 19:04 GMT
No doubt in my mind that version one failed because it lacked some sort of discipline feature for failure to reach out with the force and adequately defend yourself with a light saber.
By Steve RoperPosted Wednesday 7th January 2009 00:39 GMT
... If anyone remembers Back to the Future II, where Marty McFly is in the future (2015) in the "Cafe 80s" showing a young sprog how to work an old 80's cowboy gunman game. The kid replies scornfully, "You mean you have to use your HANDS? That's like a babies' toy!"
Here it comes, folks... still waiting for Mattel to come up with those hoverboards, though...
Comments on: Mattel bemuses gamers with 'brainwave' toy
Small parts should not be ingested #
By caffeine addict Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:26 GMT
How does the ball stay up? #
By Gulfie Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:30 GMT
It's a fan! #
By TeeCee Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:34 GMT
Re: Small Parts #
By Pete Smith Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:50 GMT
Bernoulli #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:51 GMT
Not going to do very well... #
By Rob Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:52 GMT
If I was inventing a "mind control" headset #
By Andrew Katz Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 14:22 GMT
Old hat... #
By Simon Orr Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 14:28 GMT
Even older toy #
By GavinL Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 14:39 GMT
Little tykes.... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 14:47 GMT
Can't decide... #
By Paul Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 15:15 GMT
totally padawan #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 15:36 GMT
sounds familiar... #
By Andrew Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 15:41 GMT
@ If I was inventing... #
By Bad Max Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 17:17 GMT
Apparently, I'm old... #
By Mike Moyle Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 17:17 GMT
@andrew #
By Peyton Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 17:43 GMT
@peyton #
By Clint Sharp Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 18:58 GMT
There's no substitute for a good blaster kid.. #
By Andy Bright Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 19:04 GMT
Prophecy from the 80s #
By Steve Roper Posted Wednesday 7th January 2009 00:39 GMT
Small parts should not be ingested. #
By Long Fei Posted Wednesday 7th January 2009 04:16 GMT