By Tim BatesPosted Thursday 29th January 2009 11:18 GMT
If people are willing to ignore existing laws, what the heck makes them think they'll abide by this one?
And if I was a dirty pervert, a phone camera is the last thing I'd pick to take my ill-gotten images. There'es tonnes better choices from tiny wireless spy cameras to proper point and shoot cameras that are as small as a phone anyway (but higher quality images).
Comments on: US considers audible warnings for cameraphones
Well that's paedophilia solved then #
By Tim Rogers Posted Wednesday 28th January 2009 17:04 GMT
Great! #
By Ian Posted Thursday 29th January 2009 09:41 GMT
Pretty stupid really. #
By Tim Bates Posted Thursday 29th January 2009 11:18 GMT
I see a problem with this #
By Nameless Faceless Computer User Posted Thursday 29th January 2009 11:54 GMT