By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 7th April 2009 09:27 GMT
Picked this up over the weekend. Love it. The SQ isn't as great as my S639 and Cowon i7, but it is still good enough for none-critical listening. The in-ears appears to be the same (EX082/EX85), provides ok isolation and is far better than the crap Apple bundles their iPods with. The controls are also intuitively placed.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 7th April 2009 10:05 GMT
I have no idea how you can give something like this 90% when it supports so few file formats. I could do with a new music player for the gym, but if it doesn't support ogg/flac I'm afraid it's the functional equivalent of a tepid turd.
Interesting idea, although it's interesting to note that it's not MAC compatible, yet can link in with iTunes... and that it's Win compatible, but yet not WMA... Hmmm... Something is afoot here..
By Harvey TrowellPosted Tuesday 7th April 2009 10:46 GMT
However their NWZ-B135 at £25 for 2GB is a good USB rechargable drag and drop player which sounds decent with a good pair of phones and has a small but perfectly functional OLED screen and an equalizer, great value. Advert ends, rant begins...
And another thing, why oh why oh (spells yoyo) why does the Register house style for reviews insist on using a regal "we" when an "I" would make the reviewer sound significantly less stupid? The following passage gives the impression that the writer has delusions of grandeur or is in the bizarre habit of sharing a pair of headphones for three-legged jogging excursions and flights:
"The longest we wore the player for was a little over three hours while on a flight and at the end we were pleasantly free of any sort of earache.
To see how well the player stayed in position in day-to-day use we took it on a quick jog up and down Regent Street early one morning. Not only did it not shake loose during our run but it even stayed firmly in place when we tripped over a curb edge and ended up face down on the pavement in a tangle of limbs and expletives. The things we do in the name of a comprehensive product test..."
Then again, if the editors were concerned about the reviewer sounding stupid, the kind thing to do would have been to chop out the shagging gag.
By David Paul MorganPosted Friday 10th April 2009 11:09 GMT
...bluetooth stereo headphones for deaf people?
Deaf people might like a pair of hearing aids that function as a BT add-on. then you could use ANY compliant music player. a tentative thumbs up, as I prefer my Sony noise-cancelling headphones for my daily commute.
Comments on: Sony W-series Walkman MP3 player
Wonderful workout player #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 09:27 GMT
"it would be a pretty straightforward snatch #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 09:49 GMT
ninety percent? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 10:05 GMT
More memory, same price #
By Alex Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 10:06 GMT
Looks a bit daft, that. #
By Harvey Trowell Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 10:46 GMT
"£59" is not enough of a title #
By Bad Beaver Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 10:48 GMT
Boycott #
By Dave Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 11:07 GMT
Re: Dave #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 14:25 GMT
re: Boycott #
By Mark Posted Tuesday 7th April 2009 15:24 GMT
Hmm... #
By Another Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 04:06 GMT
does anyone make... #
By David Paul Morgan Posted Friday 10th April 2009 11:09 GMT