By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 5th June 2009 10:40 GMT
"Pioneer makes great plasma TV"
The word you were looking for is 'made'. Pioneer announced the cancellation of their plasma TV division some time ago, which is the reason this is significant, not the TV in itself.
The consensus, at least until recently, was that full-HD was useless on anything below 42 inches. Nevertheless, manufacturers across the board added it to various TVs because gullible people wouldn't touch buy unless it had a full complement of mystery acronyms.
The real question is whether this is worth the extra money over the Panasonic 37PX80 plasma. The Panasonic is considered a bargain at £600-700, not least because it manages to keep the price down by avoiding un-necessary spec add-ons.
By Mike RichardsPosted Friday 5th June 2009 13:08 GMT
A real shame, a friend blew £3k on a Kuro plasma and it is just about the most awesome TV ever. It's about the same shape and size as the Monolith from 2001 and its blacks are even blacker. I don't know why they pulled out of the plasma market when they were so far ahead of the opposition.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 5th June 2009 18:58 GMT
They pulled out largely due to the strong Yen making it very expensive (and therefore unprofitable) for them to make the panels, not because they didn't think they were a success.
I've heard (unconfirmed) rumours that they will continue to make plasma TVs by sourcing the panels from other brands. If so, I have doubts about the quality of such.
By Mark TylerPosted Saturday 6th June 2009 13:05 GMT
"Setup is simple enough – though as you plug in your Sky+ HD box, Blu-ray player and PS3 you’ll notice you’ve just used up all the HDMI sockets. For the price premium this set commands, a fourth socket on the side of the TV would have been expected, but no, three’s your lot."
You want four HDMI sockets? Why? Please explain why it should have 4?
1. Blu-ray
2. Cable/Satelite
3. Games console
What you plugging into the fourth that wouldn't actually replace one of the others?
Try finding an amp with 4 HDMI inputs for a reasonable price because that's what stands in between most sources and a high end panel.
It's as if you're just trying to find something to bitch about.
Re:Blu-ray AND PS3?
No, the PS3 does not piss over all but the very top end blu-ray players. Not even close. True when it first came out but not even close now. sony 350 and Panasonic BD35 both rated higher and both nowhere near top end.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Monday 8th June 2009 16:01 GMT
One good thing about Full HD is that 1080 content need not be resampled, and 720 content can be resampled very simply. Whereas it's all too easy to mess it up with a 1366x768 screen.
Comments on: Pioneer Kuro KRL-37V LCD TV
"Once you've plugged in your... Blu-ray player and PS3 #
By David Hancock Posted Friday 5th June 2009 08:26 GMT
Why,,,, #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 5th June 2009 09:07 GMT
Lazy reporting, again. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 5th June 2009 10:40 GMT
Sizes #
By Tim Parker Posted Friday 5th June 2009 11:55 GMT
The real question... #
By Dan Posted Friday 5th June 2009 11:58 GMT
No more Pioneer plasmas #
By Mike Richards Posted Friday 5th June 2009 13:08 GMT
Blu-Ray AND PS3? #
By Mark Posted Friday 5th June 2009 13:13 GMT
Re: Mike #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 5th June 2009 18:58 GMT
HDMI #
By Mark Tyler Posted Saturday 6th June 2009 13:05 GMT
Full HD (@Dan) #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Monday 8th June 2009 16:01 GMT